Before 2019 I
had never questioned vaccines.
By later that
year I was starting to have some doubts about their safety for reasons I will
not go into here.
By early 2020
those doubts were growing, because investigations into data were confirming
things I was observed.
I look upon
this as the grace of God preparing me for the abuse that the state was about to
pour out on people, so that I was better prepared to respond and speak out
about the injustice happening.
After Covid?
Well only the most stubborn anti-learners still trust the government for things
like medical advice. They believe that the best policies are chosen out of all
the possibilities, they have not learnt how vested interests, ideological
capture, outright corruption, and social pressure lead to a far than less than
ideal system.
But many have
learnt,
“They’re
gaslighting the public—again.
Online
misinformation is being blamed for declining vaccination rates in Australia,
particularly among children and the elderly. In response, the Australian
Government is launching new national immunisation campaigns, with Health
Minister Mark Butler pointing to online disinformation as a key driver of
public hesitation.
While
“vaccine fatigue” has been acknowledged as a contributing factor, the
government still appears intent on shifting responsibility away from the very
institutions now asking the public to trust them again.
The
public is told the problem lies not with the decisions of government or the
conduct of health authorities, but with ordinary people who have supposedly
been misled. In doing so, they’re reframing their own crisis of credibility as
a crisis of information. It’s those who felt duped that have been duped.
But
declining trust in political and medical authorities didn’t emerge in a vacuum.
It was forged and reinforced during the COVID-19 years.
Australia
was once a country where public trust in institutions, such as the government,
health authorities, and mainstream media, was remarkably high by historical
standards. That trust was built over decades, even generations. And it was
spent in a moment of madness.
During
the pandemic, governments and authorities adopted sweeping, and unprecedented
measures: prolonged lockdowns, blanket mandates, and restrictions applied
broadly across populations regardless of individual risk or consent.
At
the same time, the threat was often exaggerated. Health officials would hold
press conferences, urging the public to call an ambulance at the first sign of
symptoms, only for government representatives to warn soon after that ambulance
services were under critical strain. The result was a constant sense of alarm.
It was fear-mongering upon fear-mongering, crisis upon crisis…
…Caldron
Pool, for example, was one of the few Australian platforms that consistently
challenged the mandates. And it came at a cost. We were demonised, maligned,
and in some circles effectively rendered “untouchable,” including within parts
of the Christian community. Many in positions of leadership not only complied
with every government directive but went further, framing each mandate as a
practical outworking of Christian love.”[1]
I remember
having conversations with people during Covid about how the government’s abuses
of power would lead to declining trust in vaccines and medicine in general.
Some agreed wholeheartedly, others asked why I hated their grandmas.[2]
I referred to
this article in another recent post, but last February I wrote about how the hospital
system has moved from that to
a merchant of death system. I noted in that article how the Hippocratic
oath has been abandoned and replaced with an inverted version,
The
original Hippocratic Oaths says,
"Nor
shall any man's entreaty prevail upon me to administer poison to anyone;
neither will I counsel any man to do so. Moreover, I will give no sort of
medicine to any pregnant woman, with a view to destroy the child. Further, I
will comport myself and use my knowledge in a godly manner."[2]
So,
no abortion and no Euthanasia. The ancient form of the oath saw it as the
doctor's job to do all he could to preserve life, and to work in a healthy and
godly manner.
The
revised version says something very different, and it is perhaps the one your
doctor took,
"Most
especially must I tread with care in matters of life and death. If it is given
me to save a life, all thanks. But it may also be within my power to take a
life; this awesome responsibility must be faced with great humbleness and
awareness of my own frailty. Above all, I must not play at God."[3]
The
modern doctor sees it within their role to "humbly" play the role of
God, while also denying that they would ever do that. How do they do that? By
allowing for their right to take a life. The nerve of them to think they have
that right. They might have the power, but they corrupt medicine completely by
claiming to have that right.
One
of the things which has caused western medicine to become so advanced in many
different areas in the past has been the push to lessen pain and suffering, and
to try and stave off death. These twin powerful motivations have been an
integral part of why so many researchers and doctors have poured endless hours
into improving times of intense suffering and also solving deadly diseases.
What do you think allowing for euthanasia is going to do to that motivation
over time? If you think this will not have an effect, I am sorry, but you do
not understand human nature.”[3]
Euthanasia,
abortion, untested medications, fabricated data on tested medications, imperfect
trials, bloated bureaucracy, massive amounts of profit…there are so many
corrupting factors in modern medicine that the last thing the state should have
done is act so coercive in a time of perceived crisis. But, then again, a
system corrupted by these and other factors, was bound to exactly as it did.
Trust is not
going to be rebuilt by an ad campaign.
Trust
probably cannot be rebuilt. We are seeing bureaucracy and all that goes with
that, bring great decline in all aspects of society. We need the hospital
system, life is dangerous, we need good doctors, nurses, and health staff. But
ask us to trust? No thanks. Not anymore. We understand now, we understand that
the state sees us as numbers on a graph, data points in a spreadsheet. We
understand that the medical system is now built around this perspective. We
know there are still good people in the system, but we now know how the system
directs and can even squash this. Especially when the state feels the desire to
assert itself. Hence, we are going to be a lot more hesitant to take notice of the
health messaging going forward. At least, those who have learnt will.
List of
References
[1] https://substack.com/home/post/p-195805496
[2]
Remember that disgusting slander?
No comments:
Post a Comment