Book Sale

Friday, 13 February 2026

Marriage is a Sexual Union

 




 

I am currently working on a book about marriage, but I think it might be helpful to people to share some of what is in it from time to time as I continue to work on it. Here is a section where I am discussing the sexual nature of marriage. Something that needs to be emphasized in our day and age.

Because sex makes marriage different to any other relationship Jesus says that if you are not interested in sex, marriage is not for you, “10 The disciples said to him, “If such is the case of a man with his wife, it is better not to marry.” 11 But he said to them, “Not everyone can receive this saying, but only those to whom it is given.” There are those who read this to mean that staying single is the superior way of living. For example, Augustine says, “…but those who live at the higher level, who are not entangled in the meshes of marriage life…”[1]

The Apostle Paul even seems to agree with this, as he says, “38 So then he who marries his betrothed does well, and he who refrains from marriage will do even better.” (1 Cor. 7:38). Paul and Augustine appear to agree. Paul seems to imply that marriage is a concession for those who cannot control themselves. And that to be unmarried is the higher state of living, as you can focus on serving God. So, you can read Paul as teaching this. And many have. I would argue that what he says here is tied to a “present crisis” that Paul addresses in Corinthians, but many Christians have read him and Jesus to teach that single life is superior to marriage life.

But I think it is better to read Jesus to mean this, “If you are not prepared for the sexual covenant you have entered, then you are not fit for marriage. If you are not prepared to stay faithful, don’t marry. If you are not prepared to enjoy sex with only your husband or wife, and to fulfil this part of your relationship, don’t marry. If you are not prepared to tie yourself to that person relationally and sexually for life, marriage is not for you.” Marriage is not just about companionship. If you want companionship get a dog, join a knitting club, or get a roommate.

Companionship IS a big part of marriage, please don’t misunderstand me. But that is not all that it is. The problem is that some people only want that, and they hoodwink their husband or wife into thinking they wanted a marriage, when all they wanted was someone there when they come home. Jesus drives this home with what he says next,

“12 For there are eunuchs who have been so from birth, and there are eunuchs who have been made eunuchs by men, and there are eunuchs who have made themselves eunuchs for the sake of the kingdom of heaven. Let the one who is able to receive this receive it.”

(Now we all remember what a Eunuch is right?) In other words:

Jesus says that there are some who are born with no sexual desire or ability. I believe Jesus uses this word Eunuch here both literally and metaphorically at the same time, which is something the Bible does more than we would all like. These people are effectively like Eunuchs. 

He then says there are some who are made Eunuchs. This was a common practice in the ancient East. Court Eunuchs were often the highest rank of slaves, even sometimes being next in line to a king in terms of practical power. It is likely that this is what happened to Daniel and his three friends, as they were given to the chief Eunuch. Sometimes this was a form of punishment by cruel rulers. Even up to very modern times there still existed castrati who were made that way to be singers. Modern sex change surgery is like being made into a Eunuch, and many find this out the hard way.

He also says that there are some who become Eunuchs for the sake of serving God. This is why I think Jesus uses this word both literally and metaphorically. Because some people are made Eunuchs, and others, like Paul, choose a life of celibacy to serve God. I do not believe Jesus would affirm somebody literally making themselves a Eunuch. He is not encouraging self-harm here, which was a pagan practice, never a Christian or Mosaic Law practice.[2] Jesus is telling us that if you can accept what he is saying, you can choose the right path, to marry or not to marry. Some people cannot accept that marriage is a life-long sexual commitment. Or that it at least is meant to be.

This is not just true of the sexually unfaithful.[3] There are both men and women in marriage who come to resent their wife or their husband’s desire for regular sexual connection. They scorn it. This can come in various extremes.

Such a marriage is a contradiction in terms. Marriage is a sexual relationship. That is not all it is, of course, but it is central. Sex in marriage is both a gift and an obligation. If it feels more like an obligation for one or both of you, then you are doing something wrong, I would say. And you really need to work on this area. Especially if one or both of you were sexually active before you were married. This can leave all sorts of relational and even physical scars in your marriage that you need to keep on top of. Don’t just expect things to get better, you need to take intentional steps to improve in this area. The quality of your marriage depends on it. Maybe even the existence, or lasting nature of your marriage, depends on it. In fact, in many cases you can say that many marriages fail because people do not actively seek to heal in this area.

Look I need to reiterate this too, we also take vows, “for better or worse.” If there is a medical reason why someone is not able to have sex then that is part of your cross to bear. We live in a fallen broken world, and sometimes really bad things happen.

This idea obviously needs more unpacking and I do so in the book, including bringing in what Paul says in 1 Corinthians 7 which reinforces what Jesus says here. However, I think it is important for people to reminded that marriage is a sexual union, not simply a union. Too often Christians forget this. Don’t neglect this area, don’t give the devil the opportunity to mess with your marriage.

List of References



[1] Augustine, City of God, p12.

[2] C.F. 1 Kings 18:28 where we see the prophets of Baal cutting themselves.

[3] Might need to reword this part.

Thursday, 12 February 2026

You Are Not American Bro

 


Our society has done a lot of people a great disservice in many ways in recent years, especially by telling them they are entitled to things that they are not: like expecting a foreign country to submit its will to their feelings, rather than living according to the rules of the country they want to live in.  

This man only has himself to blame for his situation,

“An Irishman who overstayed his 90-day tourist visa more than 15 years ago has been held in a Texas immigration detention facility for nearly five months rather than be deported, despite calling it a form of “torture.”

Seamus Culleton, who is married to an American woman, told Irish media that he has a valid US work permit and a pending green card application when he was suddenly picked up by agents in Boston, where he runs a construction company.

He was cuffed and eventually flown more than 2,000 miles from home to a camp facility at Fort Bliss Army base in Texas, where he alleges he’s been locked in the same “filthy” room.

“It’s a nightmare down here,” Culleton complained to RTE, caiming he is “in fear for my life.”

“It’s just a torture, I just don’t know how much more I can take.”

The Kilkenny native claimed that he did not know why he was being held — while admitting that he refused to sign papers approving his deportation.

Department of Homeland Security spokesperson Tricia McLaughlin cited that as proof that the Irishman chose to stay in detention, while stressing he was only in the country by overstaying his initial tourist visa.

“He entered the United States in 2009 under the visa waiver program, which allows you to stay in the US for 90 days without a visa. He failed to depart the US,” she said in a statement on X.

“He received full due process and was issued a final order of removal by an immigration judge on September 10, 2025,” McLaughlin continued.

“He was offered the chance to instantly be removed to Ireland but chose to stay in ICE custody, in fact he took affirmative steps to remain in detention,” she stressed.[1]

“The Kilkenny native claimed that he did not know why he was being held — while admitting that he refused to sign papers approving his deportation.” Seriously bro, it is simple, you are not American and therefore have no right to stay in America. They have every right to ask you to leave and then make you leave when you don’t want to. Your ability to dodge being sent home for so long does not change this.

He stayed illegally. He was offered a quick flight home. And he refused it, because he feels like America is his home. But what people feel about their situation is not the reality of their situation.

Nor is it cruelty or injustice to send people home, even those who don't want to go.

The central narrative of the Old Testament proves this. It was injustice to keep the Hebrews in Egypt, but it was not injustice to send them home.

Some will say, “But they wanted to leave? Because they were slaves in Egypt remember.”

They did?

Read it again. Read how many times they wanted to be back in Egypt. Seriously, many had no desire to leave.

Here is one example, “Numbers 11:4–5 “4 Now the rabble that was among them had a strong craving. And the people of Israel also wept again and said, “Oh that we had meat to eat! 5 We remember the fish we ate in Egypt that cost nothing, the cucumbers, the melons, the leeks, the onions, and the garlic” (Numbers 11:4-5). The Hebrews tried to go back before they crossed the Red Sea, as well. They even tried to stop Moses from agitating for their freedom.

Sending people home cannot be called injustice, because it was part of a central act of justice in the Bible to send people home. This man should take his free ticket, thank them for their gracious offer, and repent for creating a situation where his family could be sundered like this. He should also apologize to his family and their extended family for what he is seeking to put them through.

The entitlement of foreigners to come to another country and then expect that country to mould their laws around their desires has gone way toooo far for way toooo long. It is not cruel to turn this around.

List of References

Wednesday, 11 February 2026

A Den of Thieves

 

Image source: https://madainproject.com/antonia_fortress_according_to_josephus

Jesus said to the Jewish religious leaders in Matthew 21, “It is written, ‘My house shall be called a house of prayer,’ but you make it a den of robbers.” What is here talking about here?

Some have argued that this means you should not have a book stall, or coffee shop at Church. But this is talking about something much more profound than that. Jesus is saying that the religious leaders of his day had turned his Father’s house into a corrupt business precinct that was being overtaken by thieving merchants, money lenders/money changers, and other corrupt people. They were taking advantage of people who were coming to worship God at his Father’s house, the temple in Jerusalem.

But he was also talking prophetically here. He was also talking about what would happen in the days when Jerusalem was destroyed by the Romans. Jesus is prophesying who would take over the temple. 

Here is an extended quote from Josephus’ book The Wars of the Jews, that helps explain this:

CHAPTER 3. Concerning John Of Gischala. Concerning The Zealots And The

High Priest Ananus; As Also How The Jews Raise Seditions One

Against Another [In Jerusalem].

1. Now upon John's entry into Jerusalem, the whole body of the people were in an uproar, and ten thousand of them crowded about every one of the fugitives that were come to them, and inquired of them what miseries had happened abroad, when their breath was so short, and hot, and quick, that of itself it declared the great distress they were in; yet did they talk big under their misfortunes, and pretended to say that they had not fled away from the Romans, but came thither in order to fight them with less hazard; for that it would be an unreasonable and a fruitless thing for them to expose themselves to desperate hazards about Gischala, and such weak cities, whereas they ought to lay up their weapons and their zeal, and reserve it for their metropolis. But when they related to them the taking of Gischala, and their decent departure, as they pretended, from that place, many of the people understood it to be no better than a flight; and especially when the people were told of those that were made captives, they were in great confusion, and guessed those things to be plain indications that they should be taken also. But for John, he was very little concerned for those whom he had left behind him, but went about among all the people, and persuaded them to go to war, by the hopes he gave them. He affirmed that the affairs of the Romans were in a weak condition, and extolled his own power. He also jested upon the ignorance of the unskillful, as if those Romans, although they should take to themselves wings, could never fly over the wall of Jerusalem, who found such great difficulties in taking the villages of Galilee, and had broken their engines of war against their walls.

2. These harangues of John's corrupted a great part of the young men, and puffed them up for the war; but as to the more prudent part, and those in years, there was not a man of them but foresaw what was coming, and made lamentation on that account, as if the city was already undone; and in this confusion were the people. But then it must be observed, that the multitude that came out of the country were at discord before the Jerusalem sedition began; for Titus went from Gischala to Cesates, and Vespasian from Cesarea to Jamnia and Azotus, and took them both; and when he had put garrisons into them, he came back with a great number of the people, who were come over to him, upon his giving them his right hand for their preservation. There were besides disorders and civil wars in every city; and all those that were at quiet from the Romans turned their hands one against another. There was also a bitter contest between those that were fond of war, and those that were desirous for peace. At the first this quarrelsome temper caught hold of private families, who could not agree among themselves; after which those people that were the dearest to one another brake through all restraints with regard to each other, and every one associated with those of his own opinion, and began already to stand in opposition one to another; so that seditions arose every where, while those that were for innovations, and were desirous of war, by their youth and boldness, were too hard for the aged and prudent men. And, in the first place, all the people of every place betook themselves to rapine; after which they got together in bodies, in order to rob the people of the country, insomuch that for barbarity and iniquity those of the same nation did no way differ from the Romans; nay, it seemed to be a much lighter thing to be ruined by the Romans than by themselves.

3. Now the Roman garrisons, which guarded the cities, partly out of their uneasiness to take such trouble upon them, and partly out of the hatred they bare to the Jewish nation, did little or nothing towards relieving the miserable, till the captains of these troops of robbers, being satiated with rapines in the country, got all together from all parts, and became a band of wickedness, and all together crept into Jerusalem, which was now become a city without a governor, and, as the ancient custom was, received without distinction all that belonged to their nation; and these they then received, because all men supposed that those who came so fast into the city came out of kindness, and for their assistance, although these very men, besides the seditions they raised, were otherwise the direct cause of the city's destruction also; for as they were an unprofitable and a useless multitude, they spent those provisions beforehand which might otherwise have been sufficient for the fighting men. Moreover, besides the bringing on of the war, they were the occasions of sedition and famine therein.

4. There were besides these other robbers that came out of the country, and came into the city, and joining to them those that were worse than themselves, omitted no kind of barbarity; for they did not measure their courage by their rapines and plunderings only, but preceded as far as murdering men; and this not in the night time or privately, or with regard to ordinary men, but did it openly in the day time, and began with the most eminent persons in the city; for the first man they meddled with was Antipas, one of the royal lineage, and the most potent man in the whole city, insomuch that the public treasures were committed to his care; him they took and confined; as they did in the next place to Levias, a person of great note, with Sophas, the son of Raguel, both which were of royal lineage also. And besides these, they did the same to the principal men of the country. This caused a terrible consternation among the people, and everyone contented himself with taking care of his own safety, as they would do if the city had been taken in war.

5. But these were not satisfied with the bonds into which they had put the men forementioned; nor did they think it safe for them to keep them thus in custody long, since they were men very powerful, and had numerous families of their own that were able to avenge them. Nay, they thought the very people would perhaps be so moved at these unjust proceedings, as to rise in a body against them; it was therefore resolved to have them slain accordingly, they sent one John, who was the most bloody-minded of them all, to do that execution: this man was also called "the son of Dorcas," in the language of our country. Ten more men went along with him into the prison, with their swords drawn, and so they cut the throats of those that were in custody there. The grand lying pretence these men made for so flagrant an enormity was this, that these men had had conferences with the Romans for a surrender of Jerusalem to them; and so they said they had slain only such as were traitors to their common liberty. Upon the whole, they grew the more insolent upon this bold prank of theirs, as though they had been the benefactors and saviors of the city.

6. Now the people were come to that degree of meanness and fear, and these robbers to that degree of madness, that these last took upon them to appoint high priests. 4 So when they had disannulled the succession, according to those families out of which the high priests used to be made, they ordained certain unknown and ignoble persons for that office, that they might have their assistance in their wicked undertakings; for such as obtained this highest of all honors, without any desert, were forced to comply with those that bestowed it on them. They also set the principal men at variance one with another, by several sorts of contrivances and tricks, and gained the opportunity of doing what they pleased, by the mutual quarrels of those who might have obstructed their measures; till at length, when they were satiated with the unjust actions they had done towards men, they transferred transferred their contumelious behavior to God himself, and came into the sanctuary with polluted feet.

7. And now the multitude were going to rise against them already; for Ananus, the ancientest of the high priests, persuaded them to it. He was a very prudent man, and had perhaps saved the city if he could but have escaped the hands of those that plotted against him. These men made the temple of God a strong hold for them, and a place whither they might resort, in order to avoid the troubles they feared from the people; the sanctuary was now become a refuge, and a shop of tyranny. They also mixed jesting among the miseries they introduced, which was more intolerable than what they did; for in order to try what surprise the people would be under, and how far their own power extended, they undertook to dispose of the high priesthood by casting lots for it, whereas, as we have said already, it was to descend by succession in a family. The pretense they made for this strange attempt was an ancient practice, while they said that of old it was determined by lot; but in truth, it was no better than a dissolution of an undeniable law, and a cunning contrivance to seize upon the government, derived from those that presumed to appoint governors as they themselves pleased.

8. Hereupon they sent for one of the pontifical tribes, which is called Eniachim, and cast lots which of it should be the high priest. By fortune the lot so fell as to demonstrate their iniquity after the plainest manner, for it fell upon one whose name was Phannias, the son of Samuel, of the village Aphtha. He was a man not only unworthy of the high priesthood, but that did not well know what the high priesthood was, such a mere rustic was he! yet did they hail this man, without his own consent, out of the country, as if they were acting a play upon the stage, and adorned him with a counterfeit thee; they also put upon him the sacred garments, and upon every occasion instructed him what he was to do. This horrid piece of wickedness was sport and pastime with them, but occasioned the other priests, who at a distance saw their law made a jest of, to shed tears, and sorely lament the dissolution of such a sacred dignity.

9. And now the people could no longer bear the insolence of this procedure, but did all together run zealously, in order to overthrow that tyranny; and indeed they were Gorion the son of Josephus, and Symeon the son of Gamaliel, who encouraged them, by going up and down when they were assembled together in crowds, and as they saw them alone, to bear no longer, but to inflict punishment upon these pests and plagues of their freedom, and to purge the temple of these bloody polluters of it. The best esteemed also of the high priests, Jesus the son of Gamalas, and Ananus the son of Ananus when they were at their assemblies, bitterly reproached the people for their sloth, and excited them against the zealots; for that was the name they went by, as if they were zealous in good undertakings, and were not rather zealous in the worst actions, and extravagant in them beyond the example of others.

10. And now, when the multitude were gotten together to an assembly, and every one was in indignation at these men's seizing upon the sanctuary, at their rapine and murders, but had not yet begun their attacks upon them, [the reason of which was this, that they imagined it to be a difficult thing to suppress these zealots, as indeed the case was,] Ananus stood in the midst of them, and casting his eyes frequently at the temple, and having a flood of tears in his eyes, he said, "Certainly it had been good for me to die before I had seen the house of God full of so many abominations, or these sacred places, that ought not to be trodden upon at random, filled with the feet of these blood-shedding villains;…”[1]

When Jesus said his fathers house had become a den of robbers, he was being very literal. That is exactly what had begun to happen already in his day, probably before it really. And this culminated in the temple becoming an open den of an actual band of roving thieves who were some of the main antagonists in the Wars of the Jews against Rome. These thieves took over the temple because it was the most secure fortress possible in Jerusalem. And in doing so they brought into the house of God “so many abominations.”

Many Christians just assume the abomination of desolation was the Roman’s marching up on Jerusalem. But they are in correct. The abomination of desolation began with the revolutionaries of Israel who defiled the temple. The high priest, who was also a revolutionary, tried to stop them, so did many of the other people of Jerusalem. But they were not able to. The Romans of course played their part by utterly destroying the temple once they had beaten the revolutionaries.

But the abomination began when God’s own people allowed themselves to become corrupted. Let the Church understand the lesson for us today, as we are now the temple of God.

“19 Or do you not know that your body is a temple of the Holy Spirit within you, whom you have from God? You are not your own, 20 for you were bought with a price. So glorify God in your body” (1 Cor. 6:19).

List of References



[1] Josephus, Flavius. The Wars of the Jews; or the history of the destruction of Jerusalem (pp. 305-310). Kindle Edition.

Monday, 9 February 2026

Galatians 1 – No Other Gospel

 

You can watch the video of this study live at 8pm tonight on YouTube (here). 

(Passage)

English Standard Version

Greeting

Paul, an apostle—not from men nor through man, but through Jesus Christ and God the Father, who raised him from the dead— and all the brothers[a] who are with me,

To the churches of Galatia:

Grace to you and peace from God our Father and the Lord Jesus Christ, who gave himself for our sins to deliver us from the present evil age, according to the will of our God and Father, to whom be the glory forever and ever. Amen.

No Other Gospel

I am astonished that you are so quickly deserting him who called you in the grace of Christ and are turning to a different gospel— not that there is another one, but there are some who trouble you and want to distort the gospel of Christ. But even if we or an angel from heaven should preach to you a gospel contrary to the one we preached to you, let him be accursed. As we have said before, so now I say again: If anyone is preaching to you a gospel contrary to the one you received, let him be accursed.

10 For am I now seeking the approval of man, or of God? Or am I trying to please man? If I were still trying to please man, I would not be a servant[b] of Christ.

Paul Called by God

11 For I would have you know, brothers, that the gospel that was preached by me is not man's gospel.[c] 12 For I did not receive it from any man, nor was I taught it, but I received it through a revelation of Jesus Christ. 13 For you have heard of my former life in Judaism, how I persecuted the church of God violently and tried to destroy it. 14 And I was advancing in Judaism beyond many of my own age among my people, so extremely zealous was I for the traditions of my fathers. 15 But when he who had set me apart before I was born,[d] and who called me by his grace, 16 was pleased to reveal his Son to[e] me, in order that I might preach him among the Gentiles, I did not immediately consult with anyone;[f] 17 nor did I go up to Jerusalem to those who were apostles before me, but I went away into Arabia, and returned again to Damascus.

18 Then after three years I went up to Jerusalem to visit Cephas and remained with him fifteen days. 19 But I saw none of the other apostles except James the Lord's brother. 20 (In what I am writing to you, before God, I do not lie!) 21 Then I went into the regions of Syria and Cilicia. 22 And I was still unknown in person to the churches of Judea that are in Christ. 23 They only were hearing it said, “He who used to persecute us is now preaching the faith he once tried to destroy.” 24 And they glorified God because of me.

Footnotes

  1. Galatians 1:2 Or brothers and sisters. In New Testament usage, depending on the context, the plural Greek word adelphoi (translated “brothers”) may refer either to brothers or to brothers and sisters; also verse 11
  2. Galatians 1:10 For the contextual rendering of the Greek word doulos, see Preface
  3. Galatians 1:11 Greek not according to man
  4. Galatians 1:15 Greek set me apart from my mother's womb
  5. Galatians 1:16 Greek in
  6. Galatians 1:16 Greek with flesh and blood

Analysis

Analysis of Galatians Chapter 1 (ESV)

Background and Context:

The Letter to the Galatians is one of Paul's most passionate and urgent epistles. Martin Luther saw it as the most important letter in the New Testament, and as the greatest defense of the gospel of salvation by faith through grace. It was written to a group of churches in the Roman province of Galatia (in modern-day Turkey) that were facing a critical theological crisis. The Galatians were Gauls, that is Celts. Distant relatives of the Gallic French and the Britons and Irish peoples. The Celts were once the dominant people across Europe, but were largely replaced by the Germanic tribes who are still dominant today. After Paul had established these churches by preaching the gospel of salvation by grace alone through faith alone in Christ alone, a group often called the "Judaizers" arrived. These individuals were teaching that to be truly part of the people of God and receive the blessings of Abraham, chief of which is salvation, Gentile Christians must also adhere to the Mosaic Law, particularly the rite of circumcision.

This "different gospel" (1:6) struck at the very heart of Paul's message and, in his view, nullified the sufficiency of Christ's work on the cross. Galatians is Paul's vigorous, uncompromising defense of the true gospel and his apostolic authority to preach it. But what is often missed by Christians is that he grounds his argument for salvation in the wider context of how justification makes us full members of the body of Christ.

Chapter 1 Analysis:

Galatians 1 serves as the powerful opening salvo in this defense. It can be divided into three main sections:

  1. Introduction and Astonishment (Verses 1-10):
    • Unique Greeting (v. 1-5): Unlike his other letters, Paul immediately establishes his authority. He is an apostle, "not from men nor through man, but through Jesus Christ and God the Father." This is a direct challenge to the Judaizers who likely questioned his credentials. The greeting is abrupt, lacking his usual thanksgiving for the recipients, signalling the letter's severe tone.
    • The Core Issue: A Different Gospel (v. 6-10): Paul expresses "astonishment" that the Galatians are so quickly deserting the one who called them for a "different gospel." He pronounces a double curse (anathema) on anyone, even an angel from heaven, who preaches a gospel contrary to what they first received. This establishes the absolute, non-negotiable nature of the true gospel.
  2. The Divine Origin of Paul's Gospel (Verses 11-17):
    • Paul reveals that the gospel he preaches is not a human invention ("not man's gospel"). He did not receive it from any human source, nor was he taught it.
    • Instead, it came through a direct revelation of Jesus Christ. He points to his own dramatic conversion (cf. Acts 9) as proof. The one who violently persecuted the church was chosen by God's grace to proclaim Christ to the Gentiles.
    • This section underscores that his message is divine, not human, and therefore cannot be compromised by human additions like the Mosaic Law.
  3. Paul's Independence from the Jerusalem Apostles (Verses 18-24):
    • To counter claims that he was a second-hand apostle who received his doctrine from the original Twelve, Paul details his early post-conversion history.
    • He did not immediately consult with the apostles in Jerusalem. After three years, he visited only Peter and James, staying for just fifteen days.
    • He emphasizes his unknown status to the churches in Judea, who only heard reports: "He who used to persecute us is now preaching the faith he once tried to destroy." This testimony highlights the power of God's transformation and reinforces that his mission and message were independent and directly God-given.

Key Theme of Chapter 1: The gospel is of divine origin, is absolute and unchanging, and Paul's authority to proclaim it comes directly from God, not from the approval of other men.

15-Question Bible Study on Galatians Chapter 1 (ESV)

Question 1: In verses 1-5, how does Paul describe his apostleship and its source? Why do you think he starts his letter this way, given the situation in Galatia?

  • Cross-Reference: Romans 1:1 - "Paul, a servant of Christ Jesus, called to be an apostle, set apart for the gospel of God..."

Question 2: In verse 4 Paul refers to the “present evil age”. Is this a reference to something specific in his time or a more general statement referring to this fallen world? Does this phrase align with Jesus’ use of “this wicked generation” (Matt. 11:16; 12:39, 41-42, 23:36).

·       Cross-Reference: Ephesians 5:15-16 – “15 Look carefully then how you walk, not as unwise but as wise, 16 making the best use of the time, because the days are evil.”

Question 3: Paul expresses "astonishment" in verse 6. What is he astonished about, and what does this reveal about the spiritual state of the Galatians?

  • Cross-Reference: 2 Corinthians 11:3 - "But I am afraid that as the serpent deceived Eve by his cunning, your thoughts will be led astray from a sincere and pure devotion to Christ."

Question 4: Verses 6-7 speak of a "different gospel." According to Paul, what is the true nature of this "different gospel"?

  • Cross-Reference: 2 Corinthians 11:4 - "For if someone comes and proclaims another Jesus than the one we proclaimed, or if you receive a different spirit from the one you received, or if you accept a different gospel from the one you accepted, you put up with it readily enough."

Question 5: Paul pronounces a serious warning (anathema) in verses 8-9. What does this tell us about the importance of doctrinal truth and the danger of distorting the gospel?

  • Cross-Reference: 1 John 4:1 - "Beloved, do not believe every spirit, but test the spirits to see whether they are from God, for many false prophets have gone out into the world."

Question 6: In verse 10, Paul poses a rhetorical question about seeking the approval of man or God. How does this verse challenge our motivations in Christian life and ministry?

  • Cross-Reference: 1 Thessalonians 2:4 - "...but just as we have been approved by God to be entrusted with the gospel, so we speak, not to please man, but to please God who tests our hearts."

Question 7: What crucial point does Paul make about the origin of his gospel in verse 11-12?

  • Cross-Reference: Ephesians 3:2-3 - "...assuming that you have heard of the stewardship of God's grace that was given to me for you, how the mystery was made known to me by revelation..."

Question 8: Paul describes his former life in Judaism in verses 13-14. How does this background make his conversion and calling all the more powerful? If Paul rejected Judaism to become a Christian, how could Christianity come from Judaism? What is Judaism, is it the faith of the Old Testament?

  • Cross-Reference: Philippians 3:5-6 - "...circumcised on the eighth day, of the people of Israel, of the tribe of Benjamin, a Hebrew of Hebrews; as to the law, a Pharisee; as to zeal, a persecutor of the church; as to righteousness under the law, blameless."

Question 9: According to verses 15-16a, who was responsible for Paul's calling and revelation? What was the specific purpose of this calling?

  • Cross-Reference: Acts 9:15 - "But the Lord said to him, 'Go, for he is a chosen instrument of mine to carry my name before the Gentiles and kings and the children of Israel.'"

Question 10: After his conversion, what was Paul's immediate response in verse 16b? What can we learn from this about relying on human counsel versus divine guidance? Why do you think Paul did not consult with anyone?

  • Cross-Reference: Jeremiah 17:5 - "Thus says the LORD: 'Cursed is the man who trusts in man and makes flesh his strength, whose heart turns away from the LORD.'"

Question 11: Paul's first trip to Jerusalem after his conversion was brief (v. 18-19). Who did he see, and how long did he stay? Why might he be emphasizing these specific details?

  • Cross-Reference: Acts 9:26-28 - It describes his initial introduction to the apostles through Barnabas, aligning with his point that his contact was limited.

Question 12: What solemn oath does Paul make in verse 20? Why is this significant for his argument?

  • Cross-Reference: Romans 9:1 - "I am speaking the truth in Christ—I am not lying; my conscience bears me witness in the Holy Spirit..."

Question 13: Where did Paul go after leaving Jerusalem, and what was the result of his ministry there (v. 21-24)?

  • Cross-Reference: Acts 9:30 - "And when the brothers learned this, they brought him down to Caesarea and sent him off to Tarsus."

Question 14: How did the churches in Judea view Paul, whom they had never met (v. 22-24)? What was the basis of their praise to God?

  • Cross-Reference: Matthew 5:16 - "In the same way, let your light shine before others, so that they may see your good works and give glory to your Father who is in heaven."

Question 15: Looking back over the entire chapter, what is the primary evidence Paul uses to prove that his gospel is the true one?

  • Cross-Reference: 2 Timothy 3:16 - "All Scripture is breathed out by God and profitable for teaching, for reproof, for correction, and for training in righteousness..."

Question 16: In your own life, what are some modern "different gospels" or additions to the gospel that can tempt believers away from the simplicity of faith in Christ alone?

  • Cross-Reference: Colossians 2:8 - "See to it that no one takes you captive by philosophy and empty deceit, according to human tradition, according to the elemental spirits of the world, and not according to Christ."

May this analysis and study guide lead you into a deeper understanding and appreciation of the glorious, all-sufficient gospel of Jesus Christ.

 

Friday, 6 February 2026

How The Mighty Fall Have Fallen

 


It appears that there is a strong likelihood that Dan Andrews has suffered from the negative effects of the experimental jabs that he did everything he could to coerce people into taking. Was there a man in Australia that did more to coerce people to take these foolish injections? i don't think so, though there was a tough competition among our national leaders for who was pushing the hardest. 

Dan Andrews had some of the worst authoritarian responses to the crazy Covid times, and Melbourne had some of the longest lockdowns in the world. Some people were locked in apartment blocks with no warning with little ability to prepare, and with no recourse to get out. This was done in a way that looked more like something out of a Communist country than freedom loving Australia. And that was just a fraction of what he did. None of Australia’s leaders performed well in this time, but he was certainly among the worst. And his proud declarations were regularly on our T.V. and other screens during that time. He was at the peak of his powers.

But now how the mighty have fallen.

There is a powerful chapter in The Canterbury Tales called The Monk’s Tale that everyone should read. This chapter is about the rise and fall of many mighty rulers and prominent people in history. Many of the names you will recognize, some are not as famous. But almost all of them have the same trajectory: rise to power, pride and then humiliation. Though some just rose to power and then were brought down.

Here is a short excerpt from the book:

HERCULES 

Of Hercules, the sovereign conquering power, Sing his deeds' praise and sing his high renown; For in his time of strength he was the flower. He slew, and made a lion's skin his own; Of centaurs laid he all the boastings down; He killed the cruel Harpies, those birds fell; Brought golden apples from the dragon thrown; And he stole Cerberus, the hound of Hell. He slew the cruel tyrant Busiris And made his horses eat him, flesh and bone; To a fiery, venomous worm he wrote finis; Achelous had two horns, but he broke one; Cacus he slew within his cave of stone; He slew the giant Anthaeus the strong; He killed the Erymanthian boar anon; And bore the heavens upon his shoulders long. Was never man, since this old world began, That slew so many monsters as did he. Throughout all earth's wide realms his honour ran, What of his strength and his high chivalry, And every kingdom went he out to see. He was so strong no man could hinder him; At both ends of the world, as says Trophy, In lieu of limits he set pillars grim. A darling had this noble champion, Deianira, sweet as is the May; And as these ancient writers say, each one, She sent to him a new shirt, fresh and gay. Alas that shirt, alas and welaway! Envenomed was so cunningly withal That, ere he'd worn the thing but half a day, It made the flesh from off his bones to fall. Yet are there writers who do her excuse Because of Nessus, who the shirt had made; Howe'er it be, I will not her accuse; But all his naked back this poison flayed Until the flesh turned black, and torn, and frayed. And when he saw no other remedy, Upon a pyre of hot brands he was laid, For of no poison would he deign to die. Thus died this mighty worthy, Hercules. Lo, who may trust to Fortune any throw? And he who seeks on earth for fame and case Ere he's aware, he's often brought down low. Right wise is he that can his own heart know. Beware, when Fortune may her smile disclose, She lies in wait her man to overthrow, And in such wise as he would least suppose...

...PEDRO, KING OF SPAIN

O noble Pedro, glory once of Spain, Whom Fortune held so high in majesty, Well ought men read thy piteous death with pain! Out of thy land thy brother made thee flee; And later, at a siege, by scheme crafty, Thou wert betrayed, and led into his tent, Where he then, and with his own hand, slew thee, Succeeding to thy realm and government. The field of snow, with eagle black therein, Caught by the lime−rod, coloured as the gleed, He brewed this wickedness and all this sin. The "Wicked Nest" was worker of this deed; Not that Charles Oliver who aye took heed Of truth and honour, but the Armorican Ganelon Oliver, corrupt for mead, Brought low this worthy king by such a plan.

PETER, KING OF CYPRUS

O noble Peter, Cyprus' lord and king, Which Alexander won by mastery, To many a heathen ruin did'st thou bring; For this thy lords had so much jealousy, That, for no crime save thy high chivalry, All in thy bed they slew thee on a morrow. And thus does Fortune's wheel turn treacherously And out of happiness bring men to sorrow.

BERNABO OF LOMBARDY

Of Milan, great Bernabo Visconti, God of delight and scourge of Lombardy, Why should I tell not of thy misery, Since in all power thou did'st climb so high? Thy brother's son, and doubly thine ally, For he thy nephew was and son−in−law, Within his prison shut thee up to die, But I know not how death to thee did draw." [1]

There are many who will want to gloat over Dan Andrew’s plight. But not me.

My approach is rather different. 

We should reflect on his situation, and also on this chapter in The Canterbury Tales, and remind ourselves that we must steward the power and responsibilities given to us by God to the best of his glory and our abilities, because there is a day when we will be brought low. Whether we are able to step down from that position of power with dignity or whether we will end up utterly humiliated, is in large degree based on how we stewarded that power.

Dan Andrew’s arrogance was famous in this country at the time. Many saw him as heady on the power he was exercising. Victoria, the state his power dominated, has not recovered from his policies. Many Victorians fled, many of us Australians know people who did, and his policies were a direct reason stated by many that they left. And I suspect many who do not state it still made their decision in light of them.

But no man in this world, no matter how dominant, holds onto power forever. Many are brought low in incredibly visible ways. And that is what Chaucer is reflecting on in The Monks Tale. It is not wrong to wield power, to some degree you will be given power in this world, whether it is in the home and over your own family, or children, or at work, or in some other way. What matters is how we wield it. What matters is how we steward it for the good of others, and not our own profit. 

The last will be first and the first will be last. The wisest man who ever lived told us this, and Jesus Christ was never wrong.

List of References



[1] Chaucer, Geoffrey .. The Canterbury Tales: FREE Hamlet By William Shakespeare (JKL Classics - Active TOC, Active Footnotes ,Illustrated) (pp. 210-211, 216-219). JKL Classics. Kindle Edition.

Thursday, 5 February 2026

Single Mothers and Sons

 


This boy is a hero. He deserves a medal. I hope someone starts a go fund me so that he can live in luxury for the rest of his life, or at least so that he can get a really good headstart as a reward for his actions. An incredible young man:

“A 13-year-old boy has been hailed as a hero after swimming 4 kilometres through rough waters for help after his mother and two siblings were swept out to sea off Western Australia's South West.

The family were holidaying at Quindalup, 250 kilometres south of Perth, when their inflatable paddleboards and kayak were pushed offshore by strong winds on Friday evening.

The 13-year-old tried to paddle back to shore on his kayak before it took on water in rough seas.

He then swam for four more hours to shore and successfully raised the alarm.

Naturaliste Marine Rescue commander Paul Bresland said the 47-year-old mother, her 12-year-old son and eight-year-old daughter were eventually found at 8:30pm, clinging to a paddleboard after drifting about 14km offshore.”[1]

This a remarkable account of human perseverance and physical determination.

Yet there is another story within this story, one that many are not touching: the impossible burdens single mothers often put on their sons. Now, I do not know if the mother is single or if the father/husband just was not there, still this story is illustrative. You see, either way, this is a common trait of single mother behaviour. When there is no man in the house to lead, provide and take the protective role, all that burden is often put on the eldest son or the sons.

This is one of the reasons that sons of single mothers grow up with serious anger issues. This is one of the reasons that sons of single mothers are over-represented in jail. In this situation the massive burden this woman put on her son paid off. Much of the time, though, that is not what happens. Very often such sons are weighed down by the burdens their mothers put on them. This has been observed again and again.

Society, in general, is loath to criticize single mothers. As I said, I don't know if she is single or the husband/father was just not there. But this serves as a powerful illustration of what many single mothers do when the husband/father is not there. And this is a cause of many of our ills in society. 

Our society is going to continue to decline if we keep enacting policies that make single mothers the norm, rather than a rare exception.

List of References

Tuesday, 3 February 2026

Don’t Tell Me The Gospel Did Not Change The World


In the ancient Roman world, the cross was not a symbol of hope. It was not worn as jewellery or placed atop buildings as a sign of reverence. It was an instrument of terror, a public display of Rome’s brutal power. In most provincial cities, crosses lined the roads, the marketplaces, even the entrances to shops. Crucified bodies were part of the everyday landscape—a grim reminder of what happened to those who defied the empire. It was meant to humiliate, to intimidate, and to crush the spirit of the oppressed.

Imagine going to the mall and seeing that there is a crowd at the front entrance because someone has been crucified over the entrance. And in the food market there are people crucified on both sides. And outside the shoe shop, where you wanted to get new shoes, you saw someone is crucified as well. This is what it was like in ancient Rome. This visible and horrific reminder of Rome’s dominance and power was everywhere for people to see. It was a bit different in Jerusalem because they had special dispensation to crucify people outside the city in accordance with their laws, but still you would have seen this as a common site even there, just outside town. 

Yet, in the fullness of time, God entered that world. Jesus of Nazareth, the Son of God, took the cross upon Himself. He was crucified outside Jerusalem, in accordance with Jewish law, but in harmony with the Father’s eternal plan. And in that act, He did more than suffer—He transformed the very symbol of His suffering. When you understand what the cross once was, it is incredible that today we look at it as a symbol of true salvation and hope.

What was once a sign of cruelty and domination has become, for us, a sign of love, redemption, and victory. The cross today is a reminder not of Rome’s power, but of Christ’s sacrifice and his ability to over this world not by might but by the power of the Holy Spirit. The cross now speaks not of humiliation, but of exaltation. Don’t ever tell me the gospel has not changed this world. It changed the way we see the cross. It changed history itself. It changed how we even see the condemned, those who we know are guilty. Because an innocent man, who was also God, took the place of all who would believe in him.

But the story does not end at the cross. It rises from the empty tomb and ascends to the throne. And for this, we turn to the Scripture most quoted in the New Testament: Psalm 110.

“The Lord said to my Lord,
“Sit at My right hand,
Till I make Your enemies Your footstool.”

(Psalm 110:1, NKJV)

Stop and think about what David writes here for a second. He says, “The Lord said to my Lord…” Who was King David’s Lord, as no man stood higher than him in all Israel? His Lord was The Lord, God. So who was his Lord’s lord? This can only be a reference to the Father and the Son. For David was no idolator. Here, David is prophesying that God would rule this world through his Son.  

The apostles returned to this Psalm again and again because in it they saw the blueprint of Christ’s victory, that he would rule the world. Jesus is not merely a martyr; He is the Messiah, seated at the right hand of the Father, reigning until every enemy is put under His feet. Every dominion, every power, every system of oppression—spiritual, political, or social—will be defeated by Him. He is the King who fights for His people.

“2 The Lord shall send the rod of Your strength out of Zion.
Rule in the midst of Your enemies!”

(Psalm 110:2, NKJV)

He rules not from a distance, but in the midst of the battle. He entered our world of crosses and cruelty, and He reigns from right there—from the place of suffering, from the heart of human brokenness. And He shall vindicate His people. He shall judge on their behalf. He shall set things right. And we see his impact in this world clearly, already. Because the idea of setting up a cross is now unconscionable. At least in the vast majority of the world. In some dark places it still occurs, but the Lord’s conquest through his word, by the power of his Spirit continues.

But Psalm 110 tells us something even more profound about Jesus:

“4 The Lord has sworn
And will not relent,
“You are a priest forever
According to the order of Melchizedek.”

(Psalm 110:4, NKJV)

Jesus is both King and Priest. He does not only defeat our enemies; He represents us before God. He stands in our place, offering not the blood of animals, but His own blood, once for all. He is our Mediator, our Advocate, our Eternal High Priest. He represents us to God, and he represents God to us.

This is why we trust in him. This is why we take communion, because we know he is victorious and he is advocating on our behalf. We proclaim His death until He comes. We remember the cross, but we also celebrate the throne. We eat the bread and drink the cup in the confidence that the One who was crucified is now crowned—and He is reigning for us.

When Jesus went to the cross, He took the worst the world could do, the humiliation, the violence, the oppression, and He turned it into the instrument of our salvation. The very tool of Rome’s terror became the means of our peace. The cross, once a symbol of death, is now our tree of life.

He is not dead. He is risen. He is seated. He is reigning.

And because He reigns, everything changes. The world that once crucified its Creator now wears His sign as a symbol of hope. The systems that once ruled by fear are destined to fall under His feet. The people who once walked in shame now walk in His victory.

This is the power of the gospel.
This is the rule of our Priest-King.
This is the hope we celebrate.

“5 The Lord is at your right hand;
    he will shatter kings on the day of his wrath.
6 He will execute judgment among the nations,
    filling them with corpses;
he will shatter chiefs
    over the wide earth.
7 He will drink from the brook by the way;
    therefore he will lift up his head.” 

(Psalm 110:5-7, NKJV)

We have recently seen more of the crimes of Epstein and his network be revealed. We know in many ways how much evil and cruelty dominate in this world. The people of Judea in Jesus’ day were waiting for their Alexander the Great, their Julius Caesar. But their conqueror a different came a different way. Jesus came and defeated sin, death and the devil in a way most of them did not expect. But you better believe he is working on the destruction of evil in this world. He is transforming it, and subjugating all powers to himself, and he will judge the evil of this world. 

The only question is will you be judged by his final decree on judgement day? Or will you be judged and accounted in him by virtue of his work on the cross?