If you take
an honest look at the United States strategy in Ukraine, you can only conclude
one thing: those pushing it must surely be stupid? The U.S. support of a minor
power against a major nuclear power seems shortsighted and likely to lead to
the largest international conflict since World War 2. Are they insane? Are they
stupid?
What if they
are not insane? What if a bigger war is the aim? How could anyone be so stupid
as to want to start a world war, you ask? Because this is not a stupid plan if
your goals are evil, if your goals are the destruction of the current world
order to usher in some version of a New World Order. In fact, the strategies of the elite
classes of the United States appear to be very akin to those of the old
Bolsheviks, as Suvorov tells us,
“It was clear that Germany could not successfully continue to
fight on two fronts, but defeat of Germany would mean the end of the war. Consequently,
Lenin's task, to prolong the war, was to create a situation in which Germany
fought on only one front. For this purpose, he took Russia out of the war.
Lenin's plot was simple: let Germany and Austria-Hungary fight against Great
Britain, France, and the United States. Let them wear out each other’s strengths.
Most importantly, do not allow the flames of war to be extinguished. Russia would
remain on the side and add fuel to the fire. While "peace" was being
made on Lenin's orders in Brest-Litovsk,
intensive preparations for a revolt against the German government were underway
in Petrograd. The revolutionaries published half a million copies of a
Communist paper in German, Die Fackel (The Torch). Even before the
Brest-Litovsk Treaty was signed in January 1918 a German Communist
organization, Spartakus, was formed in Petrograd. The newspapers Die
Weltrevolution (The World Revolution) and Die Rote Fahe (The Red Banner) were
also born, not in Germany but in Russia under Lenin's orders, while he made
peace with Germany's government. Communism would become deeply rooted in Germany
in the 1920s. Part of the credit for this goes to Lenin, who fueled the
instability of German politic precisely at the time when he had a peace treaty
with the German government. While Germany was conducting a hopeless and
devastating military campaign in the West, Lenin was subverting its political
system.
Finally, World War I ended. In November 1918 Europe's
condition was exactlv what the Kremlin leaders had hoped it would be. The
economic hardships caused by war had reached
their limits in all the nations. Europe was facing an unprecedented crisis that
encompassed all spheres of life, including the economy, politics, and ideology.
Germany admitted her defeat. The monarchy crumbled. Anarchy and famine ruled
the land.
Just then, Lenin and Trotsky's love for peace vanished. The government
of Soviet Russia issued, on November 13, 1918, an order for the Red Army to
begin offensive operations against Europe.
A review of the protocols of any of the countless meetings
and congresses of that period reveals that the only question on the agenda was
the World Revolution. The aim of the Soviet advance narrowed down to installing
Communism on the European continent. In a few days, the Red Army crossed into
the Baltic countries. The Communist government of Estonia formed on November
29, that of Latvia on December 4. Lithuania followed on December 8, 1918. On
December 17, a manifesto published in Riga named Germany as the imminent
objective of the offensive. The most important goal of the operation: fuel a
new world war.
Lenin's calculations were precise: Worn out by World War I,
the German empire unable to bear the pressures of another war. The war ends
with the crushing of the empire and is followed by a revolution. In
war-torn Europe, on the remaining fragments of the old empires, Communist countries
arise, remarkably similar to Lenin's Bolshevik regime. Lenin was ecstatic: “We
are at the doorstep of world revolution!”[1]
In other
words the Bolsheviks and the other Russian reds, did everything they could to
both stoke World War 1 to make it bigger, and provoke other wars, so that they
could rebuild society in their own image from the ashes of the societies broken by
war.
Viewed
through this lens, a lot of what has been happening in the world over the last
few years makes a lot more sense. Lockdowns and mandates were guaranteed to
harm society. What if that was the plan? The vaccines, experimental, untested,
and dangerous, were guaranteed to hurt people. What if that was the plan? The
war in Ukraine, following on from the disaster in Afghanistan was guaranteed to
harm much of Europe and other parts of the world. What if that was the plan? Western leaders weakening their own Western nations appears insane, unless completely dismantling them to rebuild them is the plan.
In other
words, if you assume the people who consistently keep pushing such evil ideas
and agendas are stupid, then you are both selling them short, and missing that
there is a deeper motivation: evil intent. The intent to achieve the revolutionary ends their ancestors ultimately failed to, though they came close.
Not only did
the Soviets help prolong World War 1, Suvorov notes that Stalin helped rearm Germany prior to
World War 2. Why? He wanted war. Lenin also wanted more war in World War 1. The Bolsheviks wanted war wherever they could
provoke it, because it enabled them to achieve their ends: world revolution. And
they damn near achieved it too. The wars in Europe were so devastating that the Soviets
were able to take control of half of Europe, and then spread their evil
ideology to countries around the globe.
The U.S. empire is employing the same strategies, almost as if they are being directed by the same evil…because they are. Policies which lead to terrible ends for the citizens of many countries of the world, but continually increase the power of those in elite circles cannot be accurately described as simply motivated by stupidity. It is better to describe them as malicious and stupid, because the ultimate result of evil is destruction and chaos, and this often effects the very elites who once profited from the policies which drove it. Short sighted narcissistic evil is probably the best way to describe it.
But it is clear, those in power at the top have a plan, and this plan is based on a strategy that has been employed for at least several decades successfully. Will it succeed this time? I don’t think so, a far more competent elite in China and Russia appears to be turning this strategy against those who used it successfully in the past, but only time will tell for sure. But what is clear, is that you should not ascribe to stupidity, which historically was a sign of a true and genuine malicious evil.
"From whence come wars and fightings among you? come they not hence, even of your lusts that war in your members?" (James 4:1).
[1]
Victor Suvorov, The Chief Culprit, p4.
No comments:
Post a Comment