There are a lot of Christians giving unqualified support to Israel. “I stand with Israel” is being seen all over the place. But I think this needs to be challenged, because it is morally repugnant to give unqualified support to what is happening in Gaza at the moment.
Saying you
stood with Israel because they were viscously attacked by terrorists was a good
and decent thing to do. Virtually everyone felt that way. When the attacks
happened back in early October there was an overwhelming pouring out of sympathy
across the world. This is how many people feel when Islamic radical terrorists
attack civilians.
Saying you
condemn Hamas because of their evil and violent ideology is also a good thing
to do. Hamas need to be expunged for there to be peace in Gaza, and Israel.[1]
But saying
you stand with Israel while
they bomb (and starve through siege warfare) civilians in their thousands
to kill terrorists in their dozens is going far beyond supporting a nation that
was attacked. It is to go beyond that and give license to what is happening and
to take some responsibility for the deaths of those innocents and enable a
terrible crime. It is to share in the responsibility and God will require an
accounting for that.
This is the
not the first time that we have seen something like this happen in this world.
In fact, there are many famous examples. The most prominent one being 9/11. After
9/11 many of us were emotionally triggered by the horror of the attacks and many
in the West blindly supported whatever the US wanted to do, to get
"justice" (it was really revenge) against those whom America said
committed the crimes. But the disastrous wars that came about because of their
response showed that the people at that time who called for calmer heads to
prevail were right and should have been listened to. Most sane people condemn
those wars now, and it was not bombs that got Osama Bin Laden in the end. But intelligence
and police work and Navy Seal type special operations. Those who called for
calm to prevail while justice was pursued were right. 100% right.
To stand
with bombing civilians and say we are not responsible for what is now
happening, flies in the face of many modern principles we hold dear, both
secular and Christian. They teach you in the military that the one who fires
the bullet is responsible for where it lands so be careful to follow the strict
rules of war and engagement. But it is also true that the people who cheer on
those who shoot the bullets and drop the bombs are morally accountable as well.
Being
anti-war and anti-bombing civilians is unpopular when it's "our" team
that is attacked. But when it's "our" team we are doubly responsible
for seeking to influence them for good, not for evil, and make sure that “our” team
acquit themselves according to the principles we hold dear. Otherwise, we
become just like those enemies which we say that we stand against. We have a
responsibility to call out our national friends when they are doing the wrong thing.
There's the
kind of friend that will get drunk with you, help you cheat on your taxes or
your wife and will enable you in all manner of sins and errors. He's not really
a friend. This man is really an enabler.
Then there
is the kind of friend who slaps you because you even think of chatting up
another woman who is not your wife, or engaging in destructive behaviour.
That's a real friend.
Some of you
all in the church are being the first kind of friend to Israel right now, but
they need the second kind, desperately. Before they do some incredibly
regrettable stuff. Before they do MORE incredibly regrettable stuff.
America
needed its head pulled in way back in 2001 by a really good friend so that it
took time to calm down and not lash out in a way that had the result of upending
half the known world. But instead took time to slow down and take a considered
approach to achieving justice against the evil doers. Instead, much of its
closest friends enabled its error and this magnified the evil.
I wanted to
say that I cannot believe I am seeing this happening again, but the truth is I
can believe it because people are slow learners and the emotionally triggered
are the slowest learners of all. Back in 2001 I was fully behind the US for
whatever it wanted to do. Because I considered it a pure good vs evil fight. I
was 17 and didn't know better. I did not see how our team could magnify evil so
thoroughly. I did not know that the United States needed a reason to go to war
in the Middle East and was hankering for an unjust fight. I did not know that
our side had been add still is co-opted by an evil ideology (neo-Conservatism) which is every bit as radical as the ideologies it seeks to oppose. I did not know many
things that I do now.
This time I
will not be among those who support such a response. This time we should not
make that same mistake. Never again should we support these foreign intervention wars.
Hamas must
be brought to justice, crushed, utterly defeated. Bombing is the dumbest way to
do this.[2]
Bombing civilians WILL create more radicals than it will ever stop and it’s
just morally wrong. It is utopian to think that there can be no civilians casualties
in war, but it is equally in error to think it is ok to annihilate thousands of
civilians to attack a few terrorists. We've seen this all before, in our
lifetime, not long ago. Take a moment, pause, you know I'm right.
Never again
should apply to more than just one example of evil. I want it on the record
this time that even if it was very little, and had no effect, I still said
something. God have mercy on us all if we don’t seek to call out evil even when
our own side is doing it.
List of References
[1]
Though, so to does Israel need to stop building new settlements on the lands of
the Palestinians.
[2] If
you wish to understand how this war can be done very differently, check our
Jocko Willink. Jocko, one of America's most respected Navy Seal officers has
outlined a better strategy, and he would know because he used this successfully
against a similar enemy to Hamas in Ramadi in Iraq.
In brief what Israel must do is use a multi-layer strategy: charity to the civilian population, giving them everything they need and more turning them to your side. When Hamas steals it from them, you give the civilians even more and say, tell us where they are and we will deal with them for you. You then use special forces and regular troops to take and hold one building at a time, until you have cleared large zones of people, crushing the enemies ability to use strong holds and forcing them back from their positions and you do this until you have cleared the whole city of combatants. This strategy worked in Ramadi, it will work in Gaza far better than bombing civilians refugee camps. Bombs will only achieve making Israel a pariah nation, which is happening.
Israel went from universal sympathy to now being seen by most of the world as going way too far, which will harm their nation in other ways.
I was 39 when 9/11 happened and I understood that our response was evil. I was that crazy lady out in the street with the sign reading "Who Would Jesus Bomb?" I've been pretty depressed over the peace movement and especially over Christian peace work -- won't bore you with the details, but I personally pretty much gave up. Too many progressives who thought it was more important to advocate for gay marriage the second Obama was elected. Anyway, I just wanted to thank you for being the kind of person who actually grew to understand the message I was probably not doing such a good job conveying. Thank you. God bless you.
ReplyDelete