Book Sale

Thursday, 19 June 2025

Prophecy as Propaganda.

 


“But you are a chosen race, a royal priesthood, a holy nation, a people for his own possession, that you may proclaim the excellencies of him who called you out of darkness into his marvelous light.”

1 Peter 2:9

The war between Israel and Iran rages. Propaganda is seen all over the place. Israel presents its propaganda, Iran presents their own, and the Americans and Christian Zionists release their own version of propaganda as well. The fog of war is a real thing, at the best of times it is often uncertain what is happening, who is losing, what damage is being done, etc. I have heard reports that Israel’s iron dome is finished. I have heard other reports that Iran’s missiles have been ineffective. News is all over the place.

And, of course, the Christian Zionists believe that God is batting away the Iranian missiles as we speak. This meme comes from one such post:



It is likely that we are going to see a terrible tragedy for both Israel and the United States in this war and also the Middle East. Though things could go differently. The United States is stretched with its involvement in Ukraine, with its presence in the Pacific, and with its presence throughout the Middle East and Africa. It was not able to pacify Yemen but was forced to withdraw. It will be a massive drain on their resources to take on Iran, a far more powerful nation than Iraq, that is also far more prepared. Israel has already been fighting for two years, and has failed to achieve victory anywhere except Syria, and that victory has added to instability in the region, which means it may very well be a Pyrrhic victory.

But in the midst of this the prophecy brigade have been bending over backwards to show how everything that is happening here is what the Bible said would happen. They are pushing biblical propaganda. This, for me, is the worst kind of propaganda, because these Christians run biblical cover for the warmongers that are destroying lives across the world.

I want to look at one example in this piece, Psalm 83, because I was specifically asked about it. Let’s read it,

“1 O God, do not keep silence;
    do not hold your peace or be still, O God!
For behold, your enemies make an uproar;
    those who hate you have raised their heads.
They lay crafty plans against your people;
    they consult together against your treasured ones.
They say, “Come, let us wipe them out as a nation;
    let the name of Israel be remembered no more!”
For they conspire with one accord;
    against you they make a covenant—
the tents of Edom and the Ishmaelites,
    Moab and the Hagrites,
Gebal and Ammon and Amalek,
    Philistia with the inhabitants of Tyre;
Asshur also has joined them;
    they are the strong arm of the children of Lot. Selah

Do to them as you did to Midian,
    as to Sisera and Jabin at the river Kishon,
10 who were destroyed at En-dor,
    who became dung for the ground.
11 Make their nobles like Oreb and Zeeb,
    all their princes like Zebah and Zalmunna,
12 who said, “Let us take possession for ourselves
    of the pastures of God.”

13 O my God, make them like whirling dust,
    like chaff before the wind.
14 As fire consumes the forest,
    as the flame sets the mountains ablaze,
15 so may you pursue them with your tempest
    and terrify them with your hurricane!
16 Fill their faces with shame,
    that they may seek your name, O Lord.
17 Let them be put to shame and dismayed forever;
    let them perish in disgrace,
18 that they may know that you alone,
    whose name is the Lord,
    are the Most High over all the earth.”

There are Christians who are claiming that this is being fulfilled right now in this war between Israel and Iran, and its other enemies. Verses 3 to 8 are especially relevant,

“3 They lay crafty plans against your people; they consult together against your treasured ones. 4 They say, “Come, let us wipe them out as a nation;  let the name of Israel be remembered no more!” 5 For they conspire with one accord; against you they make a covenant— 6 the tents of Edom and the Ishmaelites, Moab and the Hagrites, 7 Gebal and Ammon and Amalek, Philistia with the inhabitants of Tyre; 8 Asshur also has joined them; they are the strong arm of the children of Lot.”

Some Christians are reading this Psalm and they see all these enemies surrounding the people of God in the Psalm, and then they see that Israel is surrounded by much the same enemies, and they are claiming that this Psalm is talking about our day and is going to be fulfilled in our day. And you know what, I think this passage is fulfilled in our day, but not how these people imagine.

This Psalm is a prayer from a man of God for protection for his people. The inscription says it was written by Asaph. There are several Asaph’s in the Bible, but the most famous one lived in the days of David and Solomon (1 Chron. 6:39; 15:17; 2 Chron. 5:12). This Asaph was the chief among David’s musicians. It is most likely that this is the Asaph who wrote this Psalm, though some people debate this.

Therefore, the very likely context of this Psalm is that in the days David the chief musician was looking at all of Israel’s enemies around them and praying for protection from them. The mention of Asshur though complicates this, as the Assyrian Empire was not that notable in the days of David or Solomon, but would rise to great prominence later. Hence, it is possible that this Psalm was written by another Asaph who lived in the days of Hezekiah, who actually faced the Assyrians, along with a coalition of other enemies. This does not mean that the original Asaph did not write this, as it may be a prophetic Psalm pointing to how these nations would eventually conspire to destroy Israel. So, exactly when it was written can be debated.

But either way you take it, there is plenty of evidence for this being fulfilled in the days of the Old Testament. It could point to threats in the days of David and Solomon, or threats for a later era when Assyria was ascendant and would actually ravage Israel and Judah (around 722 BC). Some people want to apply it today to Israel’s war with Gaza, the West Bank, Lebanon, Syria, Yemen, and now Iran. However, the Psalm makes no mention Ararat or Ashkenaz (c.f. Gen. 10:3; Jer. 51:27), or the Medians, or the Persians, or any of the other descriptors of Iran used in the Bible.[1] Iran (Persian) is mentioned in Ezekiel 38:5, but I have argued elsewhere that this was fulfilled in the days of ancient Babylon who is the prophesied enemy from the north. Hence there is no obligation, or even sensible reason, to apply this to the nation that calls itself Israel today and that is fighting with Iran, who are Persians, and with the various Arab peoples around it.[2]

However, there is a way in which this Psalm does apply today. Asaph surveys all the opponents of God’s people surrounding his nation and asks God for protection, “3 They lay crafty plans against your people; they consult together against your treasured ones. 4 They say, “Come, let us wipe them out as a nation; let the name of Israel be remembered no more!” This is precisely how the enemies of God’s people act towards Christians, and have throughout history. Evil has often risen up to persecute the Church. They hatch plans to seek to destroy God’s people, Israel, the flock, the bride, the Church.

People forget that the Israel in the Middle East today is just called Israel. It is not the same nation that was called Israel in the Bible. It is a European colony that claims such a status. But to claim to be Israel is to claim to be God’s son, “When Israel was a child, I loved him, and out of Egypt I called my son” (Hos. 11:1). The only one who can lay claim to this title, or name, in the ultimate sense is Jesus Christ, to whom the Apostles apply this verse,

“13 Now when they had departed, behold, an angel of the Lord appeared to Joseph in a dream and said, “Rise, take the child and his mother, and flee to Egypt, and remain there until I tell you, for Herod is about to search for the child, to destroy him.” 14 And he rose and took the child and his mother by night and departed to Egypt 15 and remained there until the death of Herod. This was to fulfill what the Lord had spoken by the prophet, “Out of Egypt I called my son” (Matt. 2:13-14).

Jesus is the true Israel, the fulfilment. The physical nations was merely a shadow of how God was going to call a people centered around his Son. And, therefore, all who wish to call themselves Israel must do so by virtue of fellowship with Jesus. Those who reject him can make no such claim, “28 For no one is a Jew who is merely one outwardly, nor is circumcision outward and physical. 29 But a Jew is one inwardly, and circumcision is a matter of the heart, by the Spirit, not by the letter. His praise is not from man but from God” (Rom. 2:28-29). The term Israel did apply to a nation in the Old Testament, but not all physical Israelites are of true Spiritual Israel (cf. Rom. 9), but only the children of promise are. That is all who trust by faith in Jesus, or who trust in the promise.

Christians, or the church, are the descendants of true Israel, those who trusted in Jesus even before he was revealed in his fullness to the world. Paul himself tells us this,

“1 For I do not want you to be unaware, brothers, that our fathers were all under the cloud, and all passed through the sea, 2 and all were baptized into Moses in the cloud and in the sea, 3 and all ate the same spiritual food, 4 and all drank the same spiritual drink. For they drank from the spiritual Rock that followed them, and the Rock was Christ. 5 Nevertheless, with most of them God was not pleased, for they were overthrown in the wilderness.

6 Now these things took place as examples for us, that we might not desire evil as they did. 7 Do not be idolaters as some of them were; as it is written, “The people sat down to eat and drink and rose up to play.” 8 We must not indulge in sexual immorality as some of them did, and twenty-three thousand fell in a single day. 9 We must not put Christ to the test, as some of them did and were destroyed by serpents, 10 nor grumble, as some of them did and were destroyed by the Destroyer. 11 Now these things happened to them as an example, but they were written down for our instruction, on whom the end of the ages has come. 12 Therefore let anyone who thinks that he stands take heed lest he fall. 13 No temptation has overtaken you that is not common to man. God is faithful, and he will not let you be tempted beyond your ability, but with the temptation he will also provide the way of escape, that you may be able to endure it” (1 Cor. 10:1-13).

Here Paul notes that the people of Israel in the Old Testament are the ancestors of Christians, literally our fathers in the faith. They ate of the same spiritual food as us, and drank of the same spiritual drink, namely Jesus, "the rock was Christ." They were saved by his work on their behalf, and their experiences are written as an example for us. Hence, the Old Testament is a manual designed to teach Christians how to live more faithfully for Jesus and why it is important to trust in him and how he protects us from evil.

Therefore, if we come back to Psalm 83 we can see that just as Asaph prayed for God to protect the people of Israel from her enemies, so too can we today. The Psalms exist for our instruction. Paul says this about the Psalms,

“18 And do not get drunk with wine, for that is debauchery, but be filled with the Spirit, 19 addressing one another in psalms and hymns and spiritual songs, singing and making melody to the Lord with your heart, 20 giving thanks always and for everything to God the Father in the name of our Lord Jesus Christ, 21 submitting to one another out of reverence for Christ” (Eph. 5:18-21).

The Psalms exist to instruct us to give thanks unto our heavenly father and unto Jesus. They exist for the edification of those who believed in Jesus, whom David believed in,

“29 Brothers, I may say to you with confidence about the patriarch David that he both died and was buried, and his tomb is with us to this day. 30 Being therefore a prophet, and knowing that God had sworn with an oath to him that he would set one of his descendants on his throne, 31 he foresaw and spoke about the resurrection of the Christ, that he was not abandoned to Hades, nor did his flesh see corruption” (Acts 2:29-31).

David believed in Jesus, according to Peter. Paul says that Moses and the Israelites were saved by him and trusted in the rock that is Jesus Christ. Therefore, Asaph was praying to Jesus, though he did not know that name, to protect his people. Just as Christians have since the New Testament era, for God to deal with our enemies. There is only one way in which all believers have ever been saved, and it is through Jesus. 

But you say, Matt, Psalm 83 explicitly refers to a nation “let us wipe them out as a nation…” Yes it does. But Peter tells us that the church is God’s nation, “1 Peter 2:9, “But you are a chosen race, a royal priesthood, a holy nation, a people for his own possession, that you may proclaim the excellencies of him who called you out of darkness into his marvelous light.” Some Christians want to argue that this letter was written to only Jewish believers, however, it is one of the few books in the Bible that actually uses the name Christian, “16 Yet if anyone suffers as a Christian, let him not be ashamed, but let him glorify God in that name. 17 For it is time for judgment to begin at the household of God; and if it begins with us, what will be the outcome for those who do not obey the gospel of God?” 1 Peter 4:16-17). Hence, even if it was only written to Jewish Christians, they are still Christians and all Christians are one people in Jesus Christ (Gal. 3:28). Hence, it still applies to all believers.

Modern Israelites, as a whole, do not trust in Jesus. Some do, but the majority do not. Hence, the idea that they are relying on God is simply not true, they do not believe in him. Stephen makes it clear that unbelieving Jews worship a false god,

“42 But God turned away and gave them over to worship the host of heaven, as it is written in the book of the prophets: “‘Did you bring to me slain beasts and sacrifices, during the forty years in the wilderness, O house of Israel? 43 You took up the tent of Moloch and the star of your god Rephan, the images that you made to worship; and I will send you into exile beyond Babylon’” (Acts 7:42-43).

This is true of all who deny Jesus. He is the only way to the Father. All people outside of Jesus are not worshipping the one true God. 

Psalm 83 is a wonderful prayer set in a particular historical context. It may prophecy a time that Asaph himself did not see, namely the time of the Assyrian context. Or it may have been written by another Asaph who saw the Assyrians coming in his own day. But when it comes to applying it to God’s people today, it can only be legitimately applied to those who trust in Jesus. He is the Rock whom we need to protect us against the devil and evil in this world. Once you understand the Bible in context it helps you see through a lot of "biblical" propaganda.     

List of References


[1]  Persians are of the Indo-European peoples not the Arab or Semitic peoples.

[2] If you want to see where the Bible prophecies such problems for those who reject God see Deuteronomy 28 or Leviticus 26, where the curses are outlaid for those who disobey God.

Tuesday, 17 June 2025

No More Interventions

 



Douglas MacGregor hits the nail mostly on the head,

“In the last 72 hours, Israel launched a preemptive strike against Iran when negotiations between Washington and Tehran were still ongoing.

Iran was caught off-guard.  But Iran recovered more quickly from its Pearl Harbor moment than Israel expected.

In less than 18 hours after Israel’s surprise attack, Iran responded firing hundreds of ballistic missiles including hypersonic missiles into central Tel Aviv and across Israel. 

Meanwhile, Israel's Iron Dome failed. Israeli intelligence failed. Now Netanyahu is pleading with Washington to intervene with American Military Power to rescue Israel from certain defeat; a defeat Netanyahu crafted with encouragement from Washington.

At the same time, Russia, China, Pakistan and most of the Muslim World are rallying to Iran’s defense.

Supplies, equipment and technical assistance are pouring into Iran.  

It’s time for a reality check:

Washington burned through $12 trillion in the Middle East since 2003. Result? 7,000 dead Americans. 50,000 wounded, open borders and 100,000 Americans dying yearly from Fentanyl poisoning.

Today, the United States is $37 trillion in debt, a sum that does not include so-called “agency debt.”   77 million Americans voted for President Trump because he promised to end the overseas conflicts and halt the march to WW3.

Trump’s mandate is unchanged: Secure America’s borders, ports and coastal waters. Deport illegal aliens, crush the criminals r-ping and murdering Americans. Restore the rule of law. But not one more drop of American blood for foreign wars.  

One Israeli strike on Kharg Island—where 90% of Iran's oil exports flow—or Bandar Abbas terminals, and Iran closes the Strait of Hormuz. That's 20% of global oil supply.

That means disrupted supply chains and runaway inflation. Gas hits $7/gallon overnight. Every working family crushed. Truckers can't deliver food. Economy crashes. For what? So Israel that started this insane war can drag Americans into a wider regional conflict with the potential for nuclear war?   

We have 40,000 troops in UAE, Qatar, across the Persian Gulf. They are sitting ducks. Iranian Shahed-136 Drones cost $20,000 each. American Patriot Missiles cost $4 million per interceptor.

Do the math. We will run through our inventory of missiles and go broke while Americans come home in boxes.  

The Middle East is on the brink. Here's what Washington must do to defuse conflict:   

1. Ask for an Emergency UN Security Council meeting. Ask for an Immediate ceasefire making it clear that Washington opposes the destruction of Iran, Israel and any other state in the Middle East.  

2. Demand that Israel stop the killing of Palestinians in Gaza and withdraw its forces from Gaza and the West Bank. 

3. Suspend all military aid to Israel until Israel agrees to remove its troops from Gaza and permit humanitarian assistance to reach the people of Gaza.

4. Propose the commitment of Armed Forces from non-aligned nations to police Gaza and the West Bank. 5. Propose that the United States, Russia, China, India and Brazil convene a peace conference to arbitrate the dispute between Israel, Iran and Israel’s neighbors.  

I led American Soldiers under fire into action. I've seen plenty of flag-draped coffins. I don’t want to see any more. Washington’s warmongers had 22 years. They failed. They lied.

They profited while America bled. Time's up.  

America First means AMERICA FIRST. Not Israel first. Not Ukraine first. Not NATO first. AMERICA FIRST.”[1]

MacGregor has been stellar with his analysis on these foreign interventions and forever wars, at least since I have come across him. He, John Mearsheimer, Jeffrey Sachs, Simplicius, and others have been more accurate in their assessments and predictions than any other sources I have seen.

I agree with Vox Day though that we need to stop intervening. By continually getting involved, either militarily, or at the UN level, the situation in the Middle East has simply deteriorated and been prolonged. This is a war between Iran and Israel who have both been threatening each other for decades. It is a matter between them, and not our business.

Netanyahu has been lobbying the West to invade Iran for a long time, and by some great mercy of God, despite all of its mistakes, the United States has not yet attempted this. At least no directly. I pray to God they do not attempt it now. I also thank God that our Prime Minister, a man I did not vote for and am not all that fond of his politics, has said very clearly, “'We do not play a role': Prime Minister Anthony Albanese distances Australia from Iran-Israel conflict escalation.”[2] This is the right move. It will upset the Neo-Cons, but who cares, those guys have gotten so much wrong so often that we can’t afford to listen to them,

“Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has declared Australia will not play a military role in the escalating conflict between Israel and Iran.

Mr Albanese told reporters in Seattle, USA, on Sunday that the government’s focus was on protecting Australian citizens in Iran and Israel.

Iran and Israel have continued to trade rocket fire over the weekend, after senior Iranian military officials and nuclear scientists were killed in targeted strikes.

“Australia does not play a role in this military conflict,” Mr Albanese said at a press conference.

“I wouldn’t expect that there would be a request for Australia to play a military role, but we will continue to play a role in terms of looking after Australian citizens.”[3]

Israel and Iran are both deeply ungodly countries, steeped in dark religions, however, both of them have notable Christian populations. But Iran is even more notable because it has a rapidly growing Christian population,

“According to a report released by Operation World in 2016, Iran has the highest Evangelical growth rate globally, with an annual increase of nearly 20%. This is still the trend in Iran, as many continue to choose to follow Jesus as Saviour. The growth has been fueled mostly by Iranians who are disillusioned with Islam. However, we cannot forget the Gospel’s power and transformational impact on so many. My own journey to Christianity, which began with a dream my mother had, is a testament to that power.”[4]

We know the devil wants to hurt Christians wherever they are. And he has been very successful in stirring up the United States, Israel and various Islamic powers in the Middle East with the effect of disseminating the Middle East’s ancient and vital Christian population. There were Christians in the Middle East before most western nations had even been conceived. The devil has clearly taken great delight in catching them in the middle of these terrible wars, and even using a heavily Christian influenced country like the US to do this damage.

We have no power over what Israel or Iran does. But we can pray that this war exhausts the evil rulers on both sides and that God protects the Christian people in the Middle and bring many others to faith in the process. Jesus is the King of Israel, he is the only one who can bring peace to this mess. Pray to God this does not escalate.

List of References

Monday, 16 June 2025

Episode 10: Revelation 4 - The Sovereign Rule of God

 



You can watch the video of this here

We have finished the vision of the 7 lampstands. Remember when you picture the 7 church picture it somewhat like a Menora, with Jesus standing in the middle of it, either behind or in front. Of you can picture it like 7 individual lampstands that circle around him. Either way, the image of 7 lampstands is a famous image of the nation of Israel.

In other words, as we noted, Jesus is saying that he stands within the midst of his people Israel, the Church, and he is judging them and commending them. These 7 churches represent to us a type of the churches we will find throughout history. Orthodox churches which had abandoned their first love. Faithful churches. Lukewarm churches. Faithless churches. And more.

But this is even more important, this whole letter was addressed to these 7 churches. We have to reiterate this, because people forget this,

“9 I, John, your brother and partner in the tribulation and the kingdom and the patient endurance that are in Jesus, was on the island called Patmos on account of the word of God and the testimony of Jesus. 10 I was in the Spirit on the Lord's day, and I heard behind me a loud voice like a trumpet 11 saying, “Write what you see in a book and send it to the seven churches, to Ephesus and to Smyrna and to Pergamum and to Thyatira and to Sardis and to Philadelphia and to Laodicea” (John 1:9-11).

So these visions that we are picking up for the rest of the book must be viewed in this context. These are visions for these 7 representative churches and they are therefore visions for all churches throughout history. These exist for our edification and sanctification.

Now, I need to reiterate this as well. My approach to Revelation is to look at what the visions are saying, and not the when or the how. We may talk briefly at times about the when or the how, but our chief focus will be on WHAT John is seeing. When we look at this book like this it comes alive for us, and no longer feels like some esoteric hard to apply text.

I have an opinion on the when for many of these things. Not for the precise timing, but the general idea. For instance, I believe the Millennium is for when Jesus returns and establishes the kingdom, as I am a historic premillennialist.[1] But I have no idea when this will be. And I will not even try to work this out, because Jesus told us not to.

I will as we go through this seek to give some time to other perspectives on Revelation, such as Amillennialism and Postmillennialism, and even Preterism. I am technically historical pre-mill and partial preterist, and as a historical pre-miller I agree with much of what the Amillennialists would say, and even some of the Postmillennialists. So, I will give some airtime to different perspectives when they are relevant. As I think this is helpful to help us be humble in how we approach that which is clear.

However, one view I will be pushing against hard is the idea that tribulation is primarily a time for the testing of the Jewish people “Jacob’s trouble” (c.f. Jer. 30:7), and that the Church is raptured out. This view is so novel, and so swings against the general thrust of the Scriptures and what the Bible says about who the people of God are, that I cannot and will not give it quarter. This view must be challenged at every possible opportunity in the Bible.

I know of Christians who are aging and sitting around in every shrinking circles waiting for the rapture, and for the tribulation to come upon this world. This view is responsible a broad range of errors and issues, and I make no apologies for pushing against. This does not mean I do not see room from disagreement in Revelation, there is plenty, but there are views that range outside of Christian orthodoxy and biblical faithfulness that need to be challenged.

So, buckle up and let’s get into the visions of Revelation and see how God can bless us through this.

Some Old Testament passages to consider when interpreting this passage:

Ezekiel 1, Isaiah 6, Job 1 (there are more than this of course, but these three passages reflect a lot of what is in this passage).

Study Questions:

1.     What is your general impression of this chapter and its meaning?

 

2.     Vs. 1 “After this…” What is the “after this” referring to?

 

 

3.     What do you think the voice means by saying, “Come up here and I will show you what must take place after this”?

 

4.     Do you see any way in which the above question from verse one can be used to indicate or support a pre-tribulation rapture?

 

 

5.     “At once I was in the Spirit”. What does John mean by saying he was in the Spirit?

 

6.     Read verses 2-6. There was definitely one seated on the throne, and John as well as we, know who that One was. But notice that John does not describe the one on the throne. Why do you think this is?

 

 

7.     What’s the significance of verse 3?

 

8.     What is the meaning of the verse 4? Who are the elders and what are these thrones? Note there is some help in the context of the previous chapter.

 

9.     Try to visualize verses 5 and 6, what do you think this sight would have been like, and what do you think this verse means?

 

10.  Read Ezekiel 1 and Isaiah 6. What are the similarities between these Old Testament passages and this New Testament one?

 

11.  What are these four living creatures?

 

 

12.  Vs 8, So these four living creatures are full of eyes all around and within, so they can see everything basically, and day and night they never cease to say, “Holy, Holy, Holy…” What is John telling us here?

 

13.  Do you see how often the word throne is mentioned in this passage? Why is this is? Why the emphasis on God sitting on his throne?

 

14.  Verse 9-11 really capture the essence of this whole chapter. What are these verses trying to teach us and how should we structure our lives around their teaching?

 

 

As you can see the imagery of Revelation is strange but not unknowable. In fact, this whole chapter has deep connections in Old Testament imagery. There is one clear teaching of this passage, what is it?

List of References



[1] I am not a dispensationalist. I have written about this here: https://younggospelminister.blogspot.com/2024/05/the-millennial-reign.html and I also reflect on this practically here: https://younggospelminister.blogspot.com/2025/06/god-hates-unbalanced-scales.html

Saturday, 14 June 2025

God Hates Unbalanced Scales

 


“23 Woe to you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! For you tithe mint and dill and cumin, and have neglected the weightier matters of the law: justice and mercy and faithfulness. These you ought to have done, without neglecting the others.”

Matt. 23:23

What is the most divisive topic in the whole Bible? Justification by faith? Some might say this, considering it was central to the Reformation, at least from the perspective of some Protestants. Sexuality? Other might say this because the Bible challenges many of the sexual idols of the age. Baptism? The early Baptists were willing to die for their view of believer’s baptism. There are many different options people could put forward. But many would put forward the topic of eschatology.

And they would have a good argument. A really good argument!

Some people take their eschatology really personally. But this is important to note many, many, many people would put eschatology in the harder to understand bracket and would say we should hold many aspects of it with an open hand. The Premillennialist believes Jesus returns to establish the kingdom and the millennial reign. The Amillennialist believes that we are in the millennium, now reigning with Christ. The postmillennialist believes that the Millennium could begin any day now and that the church will rise in triumph and Christ will come back to vindicate our work. The preterist believes most things have been fulfilled. But the Dispensationalist, and a growing number of people influenced by Dispensational claims but who are not Dispensational, says at one time that they hold end times with an open hand, but also in the next moment many of them turn around and say that Israel is justified in doing what it needs to do to conquer the land because of their end times view.

As I saw someone say just recently,

“A Christian will be influenced by their views on end times or eschatology, and this will impact how they interpret war involving Israel. Some will see it as a divine necessity, others as a another pointless political conflict, and still others that what is required is a true peace maker to fix the situation. Someone’s theological ideas and framework will influence whether they should support Israel automatically and see it as the default position, or whether we should be more cautious or even very critical.”[1]

So, in effect this hits right to the core of this issue. A massive problem in the church today is that a large swath of Christians, most of them dispensationalist, but some of them not, have taken the most disputable topic in the Bible, eschatology or end times prophecy, and have taken a niche interpretation of this difficult topic and lifted it up as justification for what Israel is doing in the present. They have claimed a strong position on the most flimsy possible ground.

Now, it must be said that not every Christian who says, “I stand with Israel”, thinks about it in an end times framework. For some it is simply that Israel is a democracy and the Arab world is not, so they default to this. For still others it is simply a binary choice between Islam and Israel, and they will choose Israel every day of the week in that situation and be shocked that others do not see it this simply. But for a large swath of Christians, they have taken passages in the Bible about the return of Israel to the land and sided with a niche interpretation of these passages, and then turn around and use this to justify everything Israel does as simple “self-defence in the quest to get back the land God says is theirs.” They are placing a tertiary concept in an almost primary position when they do this, because they are letting this work out in our world in a way that actually impacts the lives of many people.  

But think of the foolishness of this stance. Jesus spoke to just this kind of misaligned application of the word of God in Matthew 23. There he said, “23 Woe to you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! For you tithe mint and dill and cumin, and have neglected the weightier matters of the law: justice and mercy and faithfulness. These you ought to have done, without neglecting the others” (Matt. 23:23). Almost every Christian admits that eschatology is a difficult topic to handle. For every interpretation of a passage that says Israel will return to the land and the temple will be destroyed again, there are many more Christians who say this was fulfilled in the era of Ezra and Nehemiah, and AD 70, and that is the end of the subject. So, even if you read the Bible differently on these subjects you have to admit that it is a highly debateable topic.

But what is not debateable is what the Bible says about law, justice, and war. For instance, the Bible is very clear about not violating borders. We see for example in Proverbs that Solomon said, “28 Do not move the ancient landmark that your fathers have set” (Prov. 22:28). When Israel was about to go into the land they were commanded not to take even a foot land of the Edomites, “5 Do not contend with them, for I will not give you any of their land, no, not so much as for the sole of the foot to tread on, because I have given Mount Seir to Esau as a possession” (Deut. 3:5). Nor were they do this to anyone else, either. This principle came from the law of God, “14 You shall not move your neighbor's landmark, which the men of old have set, in the inheritance that you will hold in the land that the Lord your God is giving you to possess” (Deut. 19:14).

However, the entire history of the modern nation of Israel has been one long consistent process in violating the original borders of the mandate. There are secular arguments that can be made for the founding of Israel as it was done, and also against. But the religious arguments are all based in very niche interpretations of end times prophecy. However, the principle of justice that you should not violate your neighbour’s borders is a clear principle in the Bible, and a weightier matter of the law than eschatology.

The same is true with not killing children. This was actually a command in Old Testament for just war. Mose wrote, “14 but the women and the little ones, the livestock, and everything else in the city, all its spoil, you shall take as plunder for yourselves. And you shall enjoy the spoil of your enemies, which the Lord your God has given you” (Deut. 20:14). Just war against foreign nations, outside of the limited city states in Canaan, included not killing women and children, or non-combatants. The nations that Israel dealt with under the exception in the conquest no longer exist, hence the exception no longer exists and this command, therefore, stands.

Many people arc up here and note that Israel’s enemies use kids as human shields. But those who use 2000-pound bombs on civilian centres are mocking you when they say they are seeking to minimize casualties.

This argument could be carried over to many other aspects of what Israel is doing. Many of the people supporting Israel in its actions today were condemning Russia in Ukraine yesterday. But when it comes to Israel, they change their standard of what is allowed and what is righteous and say that Israel is God’s people, this conquest is fulfilling biblical prophecy, therefore it is excusable. They change their weighting of the higher principles of the law because of a niche view of eschatology. Which is to read the Bible backwards.

If this is not an example of what Jesus was talking about in Matthew 23, then I do not know what is.

This is not a defense of Iran. Both Iran and Israel have a long history of making threats against each other. This article is simple an attempt to help people realize that you should not change your weighting of the principles of justice and law, and oppression, because of your personal beliefs about the most difficult topic, in many people’s opinions, in the Bible. Eschatology is a fascinating subject, and one well worth studying. If for nothing more than allowing yourself to be humbled by how much God’s plan is out of our league, and how much we need to be humble with his word.

But when you are justifying real world wrongs because of your eschatology you are judging with weighted scales, and we know what the Bible says about that, “A false balance is an abomination to the Lord, but a just weight is his delight” (Prov. 11:1). Weighting the argument unjustly, because of pet theories about how the end times will role out causes great harm, and it is not correctly dividing the word of truth. Some of the people who are making decisions in the US and British governments in support of Israel’s ongoing conquest of a segment of the Middle East make their decisions in light of this end time reading. This is incredibly dangerous. Government officials are supposed to be exercising just applications of law, not applying speculative end times theories. Christians are supposed to challenge government leaders on principles of law and justice, not speculative end times theories.

There is a principle in biblical interpretation that the clear should interpret the less clear. Those who support Israel’s actions based on eschatology do the exact opposite. They interpret the clear through the most unclear thing possible. This creates many pitfalls and dangers.

The simple solution is to weight justice and law above end times theories. You will find when you remove the end times framework the dispensationalists have spread from the 19th century, and which many other Christians have imbibed, the issue begins to look very different, very, very different.

List of References



[1] I saw someone say this publicly, but I have changed the wording and not named who they are because it is not charitable or necessary. This comment is fairly representative of how people who are Christian Zionists think, hence consider it more of a type than simply one person’s comment.

Friday, 13 June 2025

What They Aren’t Telling You About Iran

 




If you have many friends in the “end time discernment” group then your social media will be especially buzzing right now with the current attacks of Israel against Iran, cue the “Israel is just defending itself” rhetoric. This all fits in with their end times timeline, never mind that the timeline has been changed time, after time, after time, after time, still war between Israel and Iran, based on an obscure and hard to interpret passage in Ezekiel (38:5), is on their end time run sheet. And now it is happening, at least beginning, and it may escalate further.

But the end times lens is not the lens we are going to examine in this piece, nor is it the lens through which we should view what is happening. What I want to show you is what they are not talking about in the Western media, at least as far as I have seen, about this call for conflict with Iran. 

Many of the people I see commenting on this are sharing one Neo-Con or another talking about how we cannot let Iran get nukes. That is the dominant discussion and the dominant message. Iran has been two weeks away from getting a nuke for several decades now, even longer than we have waited for a decent new Star Wars movie. This has been a continual war cry of the Neo-Cons for some time, and it is now reaching a fever pitch at the moment. But why right now? Well, there are probably several reasons, but there is at least one core reason that the media is not talking about publicly in the West in any meaningful way. What is that reason?

Iran is succeeding to grow its economy, and it is succeeding in a way that it should not be under some of the harshest sanctions in the world. It is succeeding in a way that presents a challenge to the US dominance of the world economy, and the US/Israeli dominance of the Middle East.

You have probably heard of the Chinese Belt and Road Initiative? This is China’s attempt to create a trade network all across the world, with interlocking infrastructure to increase China’s trade power in many regions of the world. But did you know how closely China is working with Iran to achieve this trade dominance in the Eurasia? China and Iran have jointly created a successful China-Iran railway corridor, and guess what, it just went operational,

“On May 25, 2025, the first freight train from Xi’an, China, arrived at the Aprin dry port, Iran, marking the official launch of a direct rail link between the two countries. This new logistical artery significantly reduces transit times (from 30–40 days by sea to roughly 15 days by land) yielding a direct impact on transportation costs.”[1]

This railway is part of a much larger and broader East-West Corridor that is designed to link China, physically, with a trade route directly to Africa, and to Europe, without having to use the more traditional sea trade routes. Think of it as a new railway-based silk road, the very concept that China implemented in the past to make itself an economic powerhouse is previous eras.

According to Special Eurasia this railway corridor has massive implications for our world economy.

It allows both Iran and China to avoid maritime routes that are vulnerable to being shut down by other powers,

“The advantages of this new infrastructure are not merely commercial. The route also circumvents vulnerable maritime chokepoints often patrolled by hostile actors, offering Tehran and Beijing a potential tool to bypass sanctions imposed by the United States and the European Union.”[2]

This makes it much harder for globalist powers to use sanctions to punish these countries economically. Though I think it might increase the likelihood of economic wars. Which is what we are seeing in the works right now. Iran is not supposed to be able to circumvent western sanctions which entrench America’s dominance over international trade. But necessity is often the best teacher, as they say. When you are faced with need to find a work around you often do, and Iran and China have,

“Over 30% of global maritime oil trade passes through the South China Sea, more than 90% of which transits the Strait of Malacca, a critical chokepoint over which Washington maintains strategic control through the Seventh Fleet and regional alliances, enabling it to close the strait at will. Against this backdrop, the China-Iran rail axis assumes crucial importance, offering both countries a structured alternative shielded from American military pressure.

This railway also allows these countries to avoid the ever-escalating shipping costs that many countries and companies are currently facing.[3] They achieve these lower costs by increasing transport competition and allowing for more options for many nations to move their goods between each other. Nations which stand to benefit from this new railway corridor are China, Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, Turkmenistan, and Turkey, and many other Eastern European nations. This railway corridor, in other words, helps build the infrastructure that is in the process of changing the world’s economy, and makes it even easier for Eurasian countries to avoid having to work with western powers that disapprove of them for whatever reason. And this corridor also competes with a proposed corridor that would turn Israel into strategic trade hub[4] which would also benefit her largest ally, the United States. Hence, there are motivations for both the United States and Israel to want to oppose this transport corridor.

How often are we given one reason for war, but when we examine the details we see that power and trade dominance are just under the surface lurking? New justifications are always offered by the same motivations underlying past wars are always there. War has not changed all that much in the centuries. 

This does not mean that this is all sunshine and roses though for Tehran, because this places Iran squarely in the middle of the two fastest rising world powers, India and China.[5] However, “The close ties between India and the United States may lead Iran to lean toward China, not out of ideological alignment, but as a matter of strategic pragmatism.”[6] America does not want other resource rich countries moving closer to China, but its aggressive foreign policy is having just this effect.

Hence, not only have western sanctions failed to cripple Iran as intended, they have actually motivated several of America’s competitors to join together more strongly, and more efficiently. This is part of what is being called BRICS. And, what makes this more of an issue is the fact that many of these nations are all situated geographically. America is primarily a sea-based power. Its strength is its navy and especially its aircraft carriers, but now many parts of the Eurasian world are joining together to nullify this strength of the US military, and therefore, to nullify its influence in the region. They can simply trade with each other and ignore western demands for things like sanctions and favourable deals for the West.

Hence, there is obviously more going on with this situation than we are being told in the western media. Which we all should know by now is the case. In fact, if you look up this China-Iran railway corridor on Google or Bing you will hardly find any mention of it in the Western media, even though it is one of the most significant strategic events to happen this year, and it is recent and very important news. 

We have been lied into too many immoral wars. It is not likely what you or I know about this war will change what happens, what influence do we have? We are just guppies swimming in an ocean filled with sharks and whales. But at least we can avoid being led along in another lie. What we are seeing right now is the decaying older world order trying to maintain its dominance and the new multipolar world seeking to break those shackles. Going to war with another country because it wants to trade with someone you don’t want it to trade with is as about as old a reason for war as you can get.

“1 From whence come wars and fightings among you? come they not hence, even of your lusts that war in your members? 2 Ye lust, and have not: ye kill, and desire to have, and cannot obtain: ye fight and war, yet ye have not, because ye ask not.”

James 4:1-2 KJV.

List of References

Truly Blasphemous

 




For the last few days I have been reading the end of 1 Chronicles and the beginnings of 2 Chronicles in my devotions, and I am even more convinced than ever that the temple cannot and should not even be attempted to rebuilt. Indeed, to do so would be a terrible blasphemy.

Why?

Well if you read 2 Chronicles 1-5 you will see that the building of the temple is presented there to be an act of pure worship. Even before that with David collecting the resources to build it, it was done in worship,

“14 But who am I, and what is my people, that we should be able thus to offer willingly? For all things come from you, and of your own have we given you. 15 For we are strangers before you and sojourners, as all our fathers were. Our days on the earth are like a shadow, and there is no abiding. 16 O Lord our God, all this abundance that we have provided for building you a house for your holy name comes from your hand and is all your own. 17 I know, my God, that you test the heart and have pleasure in uprightness. In the uprightness of my heart I have freely offered all these things, and now I have seen your people, who are present here, offering freely and joyously to you. 18 O Lord, the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Israel, our fathers, keep forever such purposes and thoughts in the hearts of your people, and direct their hearts toward you. 19 Grant to Solomon my son a whole heart that he may keep your commandments, your testimonies, and your statutes, performing all, and that he may build the palace for which I have made provision” (1 Chronicles 29:14-19).

David got it into his heart to build the temple because of his love for God, and his desire for God to be honoured above all other gods. Solomon who actually built it had the same desire. But David carefully and extravagantly provided Solomon with the plans, the resources, the workers, the trade alliances, and the peace to make it happen. Because he loved God so much. The building of the temple was an act of worship.

How can a nation which rejects God outright build something which must and can only be an act of worship? The country called Israel does not worship the God of the Bible. Their leaders reject him, their nation as a whole, with some exceptions, reject him. Some Christians think Israelis do worship God apart from Christ. But this is to confuse everything the Bible says. Jesus is not only the perfect representation of the father, he is the only way to Father (John 14:1-9). To reject Jesus is to reject the Father and choose the devil (John 8, 1 John 3). No exceptions. This is the basis of bible's teaching about salvation, you must come through Jesus. So, those who reject God cannot build a temple unto him, if they were to build it, it would be a temple to Moloch or Remphan (cf. Acts 7:42-43). Hence it would be blasphemy to rebuild it. God will not rest his presence on such a structure hence it would never be the temple.

Christians, however, do worship him. But we know that Jesus prophesied that the temple would be destroyed and he would rebuild it in three days, and the Apostles tell us in the gospels he was referring to his own body (John 2:18-22). For Christians Jesus is the temple, and his presence makes our bodies and our gatherings also the temple (1 Cor 3:16-17; 6:19-20). Not the church buildings, but the people themselves. To put a physical temple in place of this would be blasphemy.

And to reconstitute sacrifices? Hebrews says that there is one sacrifice and one return of Christ, "27 And just as it is appointed for man to die once, and after that comes judgment, 28 so Christ, having been offered once to bear the sins of many, will appear a second time, not to deal with sin but to save those who are eagerly waiting for him" (Heb. 9). And Hebrews 10 reiterates this again several times. To reinstitute the sacrifices would be in Christian terms blasphemy, because it would be to offer something in place of the once for all sacrifice. This is Christianity 101 and thank God it is because we don't want to bring back something like animal sacrifice.

The references to a rebuilt temple in the Bible have all been fulfilled. It was rebuilt by the returned exiles and then it was enhanced by Herod the Great, so quoting the Old Testament to prove it will be rebuilt is no help. God put his exclamation mark on the end of that temple system in AD 66-73 when Jerusalem and the temple were levelled by the Romans. I encourage you to read the end of 1 Chronicles and the beginning of 2 Chronicles and see the heart of the temple builders. They did not build just a building. With hearts moved by their love of God they built a physical manifestation of that love and God placed his presence inside of that to point to a time when he would dwell more richly among his people. We now live in that fulfillment. We who believe are the temple, because the true temple, Jesus Christ, lives in us.

It is no wonder that any attempt to recreate the Jerusalem of the Old Testament leads to such death and destruction. God appears to be very much against the recreation of a physical building that is called his temple. In Jesus is life, outside of him is futility and destruction. Those who seek to pursue the things of God without God actually pursue and beget evil in his name.