Book Sale

Monday, 5 October 2020

Sermon: Is The End of Days??

 


Introduction:

I am going to start of this sermon by giving the only answer that can be given to this question: I don’t know. It is not for us to know the answer to this question. Jesus will return when he is ready. But this is a question on a lot of people’s minds right now.

Indeed, this question has been on the minds of Christians since the beginning of the Church. The Apostle’s expected Jesus to return at any moment, and when he did not return for some time people began to worry, and some began to mock the Christian’s belief in the return of Christ. To respond to this Peter wrote this powerful little reminder in his second book:

2 Peter 3:1-10 – “3 This is now the second letter that I am writing to you, beloved. In both of them I am stirring up your sincere mind by way of reminder, 2 that you should remember the predictions of the holy prophets and the commandment of the Lord and Savior through your apostles, 3 knowing this first of all, that scoffers will come in the last days with scoffing, following their own sinful desires. 4 They will say, “Where is the promise of his coming? For ever since the fathers fell asleep, all things are continuing as they were from the beginning of creation.” 5 For they deliberately overlook this fact, that the heavens existed long ago, and the earth was formed out of water and through water by the word of God, 6 and that by means of these the world that then existed was deluged with water and perished. 7 But by the same word the heavens and earth that now exist are stored up for fire, being kept until the day of judgment and destruction of the ungodly.

8 But do not overlook this one fact, beloved, that with the Lord one day is as a thousand years, and a thousand years as one day. 9 The Lord is not slow to fulfill his promise as some count slowness, but is patient toward you, not wishing that any should perish, but that all should reach repentance. 10 But the day of the Lord will come like a thief, and then the heavens will pass away with a roar, and the heavenly bodies[b] will be burned up and dissolved, and the earth and the works that are done on it will be exposed.”

Peter reminds us, that the Lord is guaranteed to return, but he is taking his time, and will return when he is ready, because he is giving as many people a chance to repent as possible: “9 The Lord is not slow to fulfill his promise as some count slowness, but is patient toward you, not wishing that any should perish, but that all should reach repentance.” It is good to long for his return, it is good to long for his coming, Revelation 22:20 says this: “20 He who testifies to these things says, “Surely I am coming soon.” Amen. Come, Lord Jesus!”

I, myself, have prayed this at different points in the last year and before. There is so much wickedness in this world, that I would like to see God avenge. But as we talked about two weeks ago God is much more patient and merciful in his expression of anger than we are.

So, what we are not going to do today is get bogged down in details about the tribulation, the book of Revelation and the end times. What I want to do is give some historical perspective about the second coming. Show how many different generations of Christians expected it to happen in their day, for good reason, and then I want to give some biblical encouragement to you. But first let’s cover something in Matthew:

1.     The End Is Not Yet – Many people think that the signs of the end times will be wars, rumours of wars, earthquakes, famines, etc, etc. But Jesus actually said this: “4 And Jesus answered them, “See that no one leads you astray. 5 For many will come in my name, saying, ‘I am the Christ,’ and they will lead many astray. 6 And you will hear of wars and rumors of wars. See that you are not alarmed, for this must take place, but the end is not yet. 7 For nation will rise against nation, and kingdom against kingdom, and there will be famines and earthquakes in various places. 8 All these are but the beginning of the birth pains.” (Matthew 28:4-7).

1.1  Was there ever a time in our history when there have not been wars and rumours of wars. Plato once said, “Only the dead have seen the end of war.” Is he not right? Earthquakes would have been abundant in the post-flood years. Entire lands masses had been moved. We still feel these effects today.

1.1.1       People in Japan and California live right on the top of massive fault lines.

1.1.2       Famines are a common thing in the world, both historically and even today. The horn of Africa is a place of constant starvations.

1.1.3       Wars are also constant. The US is involved in multiple wars or “policing actions” right now, and that is just the US, and just the ones we know about.

1.2  What did Jesus actually say? “6 And you will hear of wars and rumors of wars. See that you are not alarmed, for this must take place, but the end is not yet.”

1.2.1       Wars, rumours of wars, famines, etc, etc cannot be signs of the end times, because they are constants, and Jesus said they are not signs of the end times; “but the end is not yet”.

1.2.2       In fact, what he is telling his disciples, is that before the end comes there will be times where things are going to get bad. Really bad. But “see that you are not alarmed.”

1.3  Why does he say don’t be alarmed? Because we are people of the king, God is sovereign over history. And he will bring it to an end when he is ready. As Jesus says, “14 And this gospel of the kingdom will be proclaimed throughout the whole world as a testimony to all nations, and then the end will come” (Matthew 24:14).

1.3.1       Notice how this fits with what Peter says as well:  1 Peter 3:9 – “The Lord is not slow to fulfill his promise as some count slowness, but is patient toward you, not wishing that any should perish, but that all should reach repentance.”

1.3.2       Both Jesus and Peter agree: don’t be alarmed, don’t doubt that the Lord will return, and trust that God is wrapping things up his way for good, righteous, and loving reasons. God wants as many people saved as possible.

2.     What we look forward to – As I said, it is good to long for the return of the Lord. It is good to trust in his return and say with the Apostle John: “Amen. Come, Lord Jesus!” I used to not want the end to come too soon, but now, as I have matured in my faith, I can’t wait for the end, because the end of this world is “the Revelation of Jesus Christ”,

2.1  As John says, 1 John 3:2 - “2 Beloved, we are God's children now, and what we will be has not yet appeared; but we know that when he appears we shall be like him, because we shall see him as he is.”

2.2  Or as Paul says, Colossians 3:2-4 - “2 Set your minds on things that are above, not on things that are on earth. 3 For you have died, and your life is hidden with Christ in God. 4 When Christ who is your life appears, then you also will appear with him in glory.”

2.3  Or as Paul says again Romans 8:18-19 – “18 For I consider that the sufferings of this present time are not worth comparing with the glory that is to be revealed to us. 19 For the creation waits with eager longing for the revealing of the sons of God.”

2.4  What we long for is the coming of Christ, the revelation of our Lord, the fullness of our salvation.

2.4.1       Many Christians fear the end times, strangely. Because they are afraid to go through tribulation. They fear what might happen. But many Christians have faced crazy hard times, and as Jesus said, “see that you are not alarmed.” Our destiny is in his hands, and that is something to long for.

2.5  Now, as I said we are not going to get into the debates about the tribulation this morning. What I want to show you today is that many past generations of Christians thought they were living in the end times, the tribulation itself, and they were wrong. Even though they had good reason to believe it.

3.     Many Times The End Of The World Happened (But Didn’t).

3.1  The destruction of Jerusalem – I have preached a whole sermon this event, based on Mark 13, it is titled: A Prophecy of the End, but what end?

3.1.1       There is no doubt many early Christians believed this to be the prophesied tribulation and end times: Schaff tells us in his history of the Christian Church: “The prophetic description of the last days by our Lord began to be fulfilled before the generation to which he spoke had passed away, and the day of judgement seemed to be close at hand. So the Christians believed, and had good reason to believe.”[1] Why did they have reason to believe?

3.1.1.1 It began with the reign of Nero, Christian persecution, and decadence and evil, that even shamed many Romans watching on.

3.1.1.2 The temple, God’s house was wiped out.

3.1.1.3 The abomination of desolation trampled all over the holy place.

3.1.1.4 The Jews were annihilated in a one of the most destructive wars in the world till that time.

3.1.1.5 As the armies surrounded Jerusalem, Christians fled, just as Jesus told them to. 

3.1.1.6 It was truly a tribulation, a time of trouble, like none other, that had been seen in the world of that era. Even the Roman’s were horrified, and the terrors which the Jews struck upon each other equalled, if not excelled what the Roman’s did. 

3.1.1.7 Read Tacitus’ description of the era: “Tacitus begins his history of Rome after the death of Nero with these words: "I proceed to a work rich in disasters, full of atrocious battles, of discord and rebellion, yea, horrible even in peace. Four princes [Galba, Otho, Vitellius, Domitian] killed by the sword; three civil wars, several foreign wars; and mostly raging at the same time. Favorable events in the East [the subjugation of the Jews], unfortunate ones in the West. Illyria disturbed, Gaul uneasy; Britain conquered and soon relinquished; the nations of Sarmatia and Suevia rising against us; the Parthians excited by the deception of a pseudo-Nero. Italy also weighed down by Dew or oft-repeated calamities; cities swallowed up or buried in ruins; Rome laid waste by conflagrations, the old temples burned up, even the capitol set on fire by citizens; sanctuaries desecrated; adultery rampant in high places. The sea filled with exiles; the rocky islands contaminated with murder. Still more horrible the fury in the city. Nobility, riches, places of honor, whether declined or occupied, counted as crimes, and virtue sure of destruction.”[2]

3.1.1.8 Many saw this as the end of days, and had every reason to, but it was not. It does point to them though, what they will be like.

3.2  The Invading Muslim Hordes – One of the things we keep hearing people say is how so much of this Covid time is unprecedented. Indeed, the word unprecedented has been used at unprecedented levels through this entire crisis. But history has a way of throwing up unprecedented curveballs. It was unprecedented went the Arab armies, supposedly inspired by Muhammed, came raging out of the Arabian peninsula, and defeated Heraclius, the Roman Emperor and the Persian Empire as well.

3.2.1       Till this time Arab armies were considered decent soldiers, but bad armies. They were used as light cavalry by the Romans as auxiliaries. Indeed, many of the Roman Arab soldiers were Christians. Arabs were not known for standing and fighting in pitched battles. They preferred quick in and out raids, which is why they made good light cavalry.

3.2.2       But this all changed in 636AD when an Arab army crushed the Byzantine Army of Heraclius. Rome at this time was weakened by a long war with Persia, which they had won actually. But this battle was lost, and the Provinces of Palestine were captured, Jerusalem was captured a few years later, then the Muslim armies not long after this conquered much of the Persian Empire, and took Egypt from the Romans.

3.2.3       From the perspective of the Greek Christians of the era, it was like the Abyss was opened, and the servants of the devil were raging across the land, burning churches, raping Christian women, killing Christian men, and more. This felt like the end of days. But really it was the end of Roman Imperial rule in the lands of Syria and Jerusalem.

3.2.4       For some time afterwards this is how Muhammed was described: “The medieval writers, both Greek and Latin, represent Mohammed as an imposter and arch-heretic, who wove his false religion chiefly from Jewish (Talmudic) fables and Christian heresies. They find him foretold in the little horn of Daniel, and the False Prophet of the Apocalypse.”[3] Who better to serve as the model anti-Christ than a false prophet like Muhammed? But yet this was not the end. It felt like it, but it was not.    

3.3  The Words of Pope Gregory in the 7th Century – Now I know it is not the best thing to do, to quote a Pope in a Baptist Church, but surely it is ok, if I am saying he was wrong? Pope Gregory wrote to an Anglo-Saxon King in 601 AD, these interesting words:

3.3.1       “But as the same end of the world approaches, many things are at hand which were not before, viz. changes of the air, and terrors from heaven, and tempests out of order of the season, wars, famines earthquakes in several places; which things will not, nevertheless happen in our days, but after our days.”[4]

3.3.2       What was this guy seeing? The Climate changing and bringing storms out of season. Sound familiar?? All sorts of troubles around the world. And he believed the end of time was imminent, maybe not in his day, but soon. This was written 1419 years ago. It felt like the end was nigh, but it wasn’t, not even close.   

3.4  The Reformation – is another classic period where many thought they were in the end of Days. Indeed, the popular idea that the pope was the Anti-Christ took hold in this era, and has remained in much of the Church. It might even be right for all we know, eventually. Surely many popes have been wicked.

3.4.1       Think about this time: the church was not just split in half, but into hundreds, if not more, small little bickering factions, that did not just turn against the Catholic Church, but against each other. Whole governments were brought into question. Rebellions happened all over the place. There are many examples of people believing this was the tribulation, but my favourite is Melchoir Hoffman.

3.4.2       Hoffman was a radical end times preacher. A millenarian. He preached the imminent coming of the kingdom of God, to be established in Strasbourg. He believed the world would end in 1533, “and that he would ride into Strassburg with Christ in the clouds to establish the New Jerusalem.”[5]

3.4.3       A follower of his prophesied over him in 1533 that he would spend 6 months in jail. So, Hoffman turned himself in, waiting in jail for the coming of Jesus. He died in 1543, in prison, a broken man.

3.4.4       Hoffman comes across as many of the false prophets of today’s church do: charismatic, smart, creative, a great preacher, he gathered a massive following. I wish many of the modern versions of him would follow his example and offer to stay in jail until their prophecies come true.

3.4.5       Hoffman caused a lot of damage, some of his followers took his words to the next level, took over a town called Munster, tried to set up the kingdom of God, instituted polygamy, violence against unbelievers, etc, etc. The leaders in Munster were so wicked, that in 1535, in the middle of the Reformation, the Catholics and Protestants united to defeat them in battle to take back the city.

3.4.6       Many bad men like Hoffman’s followers, and many good Christian men, believed that the Reformation was the end of time, the beginning of the tribulation. They had many reasons to believe this. They were wrong.

3.5  The Napoleonic Wars – John said this: 1 John 2:18 - “Children, it is the last hour, and as you have heard that antichrist is coming, so now many antichrists have come. Therefore we know that it is the last hour.” John predicted that many Anti-Christ’s would come, before the big one, the final one. So, who is the Anti-Christ? Well, I wonder if John knew how many predictions there would be, if the end time predictors were right, then the Anti-Christ has come a thousand times. Now, there is no doubt that many lesser anti-Christs, that is false Messiahs have sprung up, but did you know Napoleon was a number one contender in his day?

3.5.1       Napoleon built an Army the size of which Europe had never seen. Rather than being tens of thousands strong, it contained half a million men. He conquered most of Europe: In 1804 he was crowned the Emperor of the Gauls. In 1807 he divided Europe with the Tsar of Russia. In 1809 he arrested the pope and dominated the Papal states.  By 1815 Napoleon had fought, subjugated or invaded: Most of Europe, the Middle East, including Italy, Austria, Germany, Poland, Russia, parts of Palestine and Egypt. He gave his son the title: King of Rome, and he dubbed himself the King of Kings, and his goal was to set himself up as the supreme sovereign of the Roman Empire.[6]

3.5.2       One of his famous quotes was: “Remember that I march followed by the god of fortune and the god of war.”[7] Some famous preachers of that day saw him as the anti-Christ. Indeed, Napoleon’s clearly demonic reign inspired new movements dedicated to end time prophecy, many of which are still around today, and are consistently making predictions about the end times that are wrong.

3.5.3       There was probably no greater contender for the anti-Christ than Napoleon in the last couple of hundred years, and yet all those who thought they were in the end times in his day, were wrong.   

3.6  World War 1 – Then of course there is World War 1. The brilliant history Podcaster Dan Carlin called his WW1 series, the Blueprint For Armageddon. Well named. 20 Million people died. Tolkien based his idea of Mordor on the Battle of Somme, where he had fought. Poison gas! Artillery that felt like the sky was falling in! Weapons that spat hails of bullet like they were purpose designed by demons to slay man. It was a true meat grinder, as young man, after young man, was forced to run into machine gun wire again and again. Just one more charge.

3.6.1       It would have felt to many that demons ruled the Great Powers. I would say they did. Paul tells us demons rule this world: Ephesians 6:11-12 - “11 Put on the whole armor of God, that you may be able to stand against the schemes of the devil. 12 For we do not wrestle against flesh and blood, but against the rulers, against the authorities, against the cosmic powers over this present darkness, against the spiritual forces of evil in the heavenly places.” But we can’t beat them with machine guns.

3.6.2       Imagine the first time an ordinary solider saw a tank. It would have felt like fighting one of the beasts out of Armageddon. Then WW1 was followed by the Spanish flu that killed 50 Million people. How could you not think this was the end? And yet it was not only not the end, it wasn’t even our worst war.   

3.7  World War 2 – In World War 2, 70-85 million people died. It is estimated 3% of the world’s population died in or because of the war. There are so many tragedies in this war: people on all sides were wiping each other out. The eastern front was probably the closest the world ever gotten to hell on earth. We are all aware of the famous catastrophes of this war.

3.7.1       One of the worst single events was the bombing of Dresden. Dresden was a civilian city, with no significant military infrastructure, and the allies bombed it into oblivion. Dropping explosive and incendiary bombs, plus Napalm. Some reports say in one night 250,000 people were killed. The city was annihilated.  

3.7.2       Nagasaki, Hiroshima, deaths in concentrations camps of Slavs, gypsies, Jews and others and, the slaughter of German, Polish, Russian and Chinese civilians among others. Total war around the world. In 1919 no one could imagine a war surpassing the Great War. Then it was not only surpassed, but thoroughly eclipsed. Most of Europe, England, North Africa, Russia, Japan and massive parts of China were bombed into oblivion: Revelation 8:7 – “The first angel blew his trumpet, and there followed hail and fire, mixed with blood, and these were thrown upon the earth. And a third of the earth was burned up, and a third of the trees were burned up, and all green grass was burned up.” You could forgive people for thinking they were in the middle of the Trumpet judgements. Stalin, Hitler, FDR, all candidates for the Anti-Christ, depending whose side you were one. Yet none were.

4.     So what about today? – Is some of what we see today unprecedented? Yes, worldwide shutdowns of countries. Churches rolling over in most places without a fight. The economy crippled over a virus, that while serious, is not what they originally made it out to be. There are signs of corruption at the highest levels of politics and the medical industry. Everyone now knows that some vaccines have been cultured in aborted baby cells. A lot is being revealed, a lot of questions are being raised, and there is a strangeness to our time. You can feel it in the air, it feels strange, it feels ominous, like evil is rising. People are nervous about where society is headed. More can be said.  

4.1  But as we have seen, it can get really bad, really, really, really bad and still not yet be the end times. Many generations were absolutely convinced they were in them, and they were wrong.

4.2  I am convinced the final generation will not think they are in the end times, they will know. All of our interpretations of Revelation will be laid bare before what Jesus actually does. Until then, how should we live? As Peter told those living in expectation of the end:

4.2.1       2 Peter 3:14-18 - “14 Therefore, beloved, since you are waiting for these, be diligent to be found by him without spot or blemish, and at peace. 15 And count the patience of our Lord as salvation, just as our beloved brother Paul also wrote to you according to the wisdom given him, 16 as he does in all his letters when he speaks in them of these matters. There are some things in them that are hard to understand, which the ignorant and unstable twist to their own destruction, as they do the other Scriptures. 17 You therefore, beloved, knowing this beforehand, take care that you are not carried away with the error of lawless people and lose your own stability. 18 But grow in the grace and knowledge of our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ. To him be the glory both now and to the day of eternity. Amen.”

4.2.2       Our role is to live righteous lives, be at peace, trust the Lord will return in his time, and knows what is best for us.

4.2.3       Also, ignore all of the vain predictions about the return of Christ: “take care that you are not carried away with the error of lawless people and lose your own stability.” There will always be big and crazy end times predictions. So far they have all been wrong. But more will be made.

4.2.4       We should focus on growing in grace, and knowledge of Jesus, sharing the gospel, being his people. In other words, hell or high water, our role is just to be the Church, come what may. That is our role. To be ready for him to come at any time. Have you placed your trust in the king? He is returning one day.

5.     Conclusion – So, is this the end times? Maybe. I would not be surprised. But that’s in Jesus’ court. My job, your job, our job, is to be his faithful witnesses, until he decides to end this thing on his time. Let’s pray.     

 

 References:



[1] Schaff, Phillip, 1988, A History of the Christian Church, Volume 1, William B Eerdmans, p391.

[2] Schaff, Phillip, 1988, A History of the Christian Church, Volume 1, William B Eerdmans, p392.

[3] Schaff, Phillip,1989, A History of the Christian Church, Volume 4, William B Eerdmans, p196.

[4] From Bede’s Ecclesiastical History, p59.

[6] Seizer, Stephen, Christian Zionism, Inter-Varsity Press, p31.

[7] Ibid, p31.

Wednesday, 30 September 2020

Satanic Feminism Two: The Wicked Subverted The West With Story

 



How do you change a western world where blasphemy is illegal?

By way of subversion.

In the first instalment of this series we discussed how the wicked decided that the West needed to change. This is a statement that many people struggle with because progress towards a greater future is just assumed by many people, whether on the left or the right. This is one of the reasons why it is so hard to have this conversation with some people, because so many people do not understand just how inverted the world in which we live is, they do not realize that we have given up much that is good, and received bad in return. Most people are avowed modern supremacists, who think our modern society is just inherently superior to the past. So, what I am going to do here in part two of this series is first give a simple illustration which highlights just how inverted out modern culture is, and then I will begin to summarize how the West was made from Christendom into Satandom, with more to follow in future articles.  

People are generally poorly equipped to question the cultural assumptions of the society they grew up in. In an era where history is poorly taught, this inability is only exacerbated. So, perhaps I can step outside of our topic to use an illustration from C.S. Lewis that will help us here. In his powerful book Mere Christianity, Lewis makes a series of arguments that show the intellectual soundness and solidness of the Christian faith. While making his case for the superiority of the Christian perspective on sexuality morality,  to try and highlight just how fallen his culture was, he reaches into what he considers to be the realm of absurdity to make his point:

You can get a large audience together for a strip-tease act—that is, to watch a girl undress on the stage. Now suppose you came to a country where you could fill a theatre by simply bringing a covered plate on to the stage and then slowly lifting the cover so as to let every one see, just before the lights went out, that it contained a mutton chop or a bit of bacon, would you not think that in that country something had gone wrong with the appetite for food? And would not anyone who had grown up in a different world think there was something equally queer about the state of the sex instinct among us?”[1] 

What I find fascinating about this illustration here is that when C.S. Lewis first published this in 1952 the entire premise of his illustration was ridiculous; and that is precisely the point. Lewis is seeking to highlight in Big Neon Letters that something had gone wrong with the sexual appetite of the western man, and the way he can think to best describe this is to highlight how crazy it would be to the man of 1952 to see a world where people gathered around to watch food revealed to a lusting audience. I find this so fascinating because without intending to, Lewis has described our western world today. This is what many competition cooking shows are: food lusting events where people gather around to drool over the fancily prepared blow torched whatever it is. We are a culture of gluttons. Whether in the Church or outside the Church, many of our instincts for what is good, and what is not have been thoroughly inverted.

Meditate on this for a second: the most ridiculous morally dystopian world that C.S. Lewis described is the world we currently live in. Evil is wickedness, it is rebellion, it is that which stands against God, but it is also craziness, insanity, stupidity, because at heart evil is rebellion against God and his good order. That which creates chaos is foolishness, foolishness often with wicked intent. So, the fact that our society reflects in high definition detail the absurdity of C.S. Lewis’s illustration is a big sign we have been directed down an evil path, even more so, than when Lewis was alive.

Lewis’ world was not perfect, by any means, it was the era of Stalin, Hitler, and of Churchill bombing civilian centres like Dresden, and leaders lying their peoples into destructive wars, and much, much more. But it is clear we have digressed even further since Lewis’ day in many ways. If we have not become more violent, we have become more decadent, and there are scores of the unborn dead who would dispute that we are not more violent…if they had a voice that is. Now that we have established that we are not necessarily morally superior to our predecessors, we will reflect on how we got here.

Let’s situate ourselves in the early modern period, England in the 17th Century. This is an era where blasphemy is still quite illegal, and even if you subscribe to one of the various Christian sects, you may still be labelled a heretic, or dissenter and punished. In various decades whether or not you were a Presbyterian, Anglican or Catholic was of imminent consequence, and if you were Baptist then in every decade of the 17th Century England you were unpopular[2]. Legislation like the Test Acts of 1673 were designed to weed out Catholics and other dissenters from public office.[3] This was the era that the famous Baptist preacher, John Bunyan was imprisoned for unauthorized preaching,[4] that Cromwell replaced the monarchy for a time, that Anglicanism was seeking to establish it’s hold over England, and various other Christian movements vied for legitimacy, if not supremacy. It was an era where blasphemy was dangerous.

Indeed, even the famous Acts of Toleration in 1689 did not grant full religious rights to dissenters, even dissenters who were thoroughly Christian, like Bunyan.[5] So how do you direct a western world toward Satanic values, when to even express such values is punishable in many ways?

Story…

You change society by telling stories, and you do it in such a way that you can get around the blasphemy codes. This is precisely how Satanic feminists and socialists did it from early on.

We all recognize the power of story. Hollywood is famous for pushing certain agendas through the medium of story-telling. Both good, and bad, but mostly bad. I remember growing up one of my favourite films was John Wayne’s, The Green Berets. I used to watch it as a kid. But when I got a little bit older, I realized it was some over-the-top pro-Vietnam war propaganda. Hollywood and propaganda are well known bedfellows, indeed, much of our modern morality has been driven by the values represented on the silver screen. Some people may wonder what comes first: the values as presented in the movies or the movies that present the values? Well in some cases it might be both, but regarding feminism there was a clear push from certain literary figures to influence society in a certain direction through story.

Per Faxneld’s well researched work Satanic Feminism: Lucifer as Liberator of Woman in Nineteenth-Century Culture shows a large proportion of how this change was pushed. In fact, part of his case is that Satanism has not been given the credit it deserves for our modern society. He shows how Satanic feminists subverted the idea of Lucifer being the agent of wickedness in the garden, and transformed him into the ‘Lightbringer’, the ‘Prometheus’, the enlightener, or liberator and specifically the liberator of women. And he shows how this was instrumental in destabilizing Christianity’s dominant role in West.[6]

Faxneld[7] traces this trend as far back as Milton. Though he does not claim that Milton was a Satanic revolutionary himself, he suggests that when you combine Milton’s ambiguous representation of the devil in his Paradise Lost, with the context in which Milton was a republican revolutionary and Oliver Cromwell’s private secretary, you can draw the conclusion that Milton is making the revolutionary Lucifer the hero of the story, rather than the villain. Afterall, was Milton not himself a revolutionary and part of a plot to overthrow a king? Does he not also present the Devil as simply convincing the woman to eat the fruit to raise her lot, and achieve equality? Something many moderns see as righteous and just, and a foundation stone of republican ideals.  

But this conjecture aside, explicitly “…the phenomenon of writers declaring themselves to be of the Devil’s party first arose among German and English-speaking Romantic poets in the late eighteenth-century and would soon become observable all over the western world.”[8] It is important to understand that this was not a fringe movement in literary circles, rather it was “…both highly visible and stemming directly from writers that were among the most famous of their time.”[9] Just as today’s Luciferian morality is pushed by the most famous and most loved actors and performers…

Milton himself argued that his intent was to ‘justify the ways of God to men’ and not at all to glorify lucifer”[10], and scholars generally accept this as correct. However, this did not stop others interpreting Milton’s Lucifer as the ideal revolutionary and being inspired to write with this intention in mind. For example, inspired by Milton,

Goethe’s poem ‘Prometheus’ (written in 1772-74, published 1789), in which the Greek Titan expressed his defiance of God (Zeus) and relished his own independence, displays a congruent spirit of rebellion against an oppressive divinity, but cloaks it in a less offensive Greek garb.[11]

Goethe took what he saw in Milton to another level. Faxneld lists an impressive array of writers who were similarly inspired by Milton’s Lucifer: Edmund Burke, Mary Wollstonecraft, William Blake, Schiller, Goethe, Robert Burns, and William Godwin, among others.[12] Godwin even wrote, “Poetical readers have commonly remarked Milton’s devil to be of considerable virtue.”[13] He then goes on to argue,

[Why] did he rebel against his maker? It was, as he himself informs us, because he saw no sufficient reason, for that extreme inequality of rank and power which the creator assumed. It was because his prescription and precedent form no adequate ground for implicit faith.[14]

In other words, Satan presumed to be as great as the one who was better than him. Godwin, here, has identified Lucifer as his ideal hero, who stands against what he considers illegitimate and inherited authority.[15] The ultimate symbol of revolution! In the circles which Godwin ran in, his views on Lucifer were considered acceptable.[16] Indeed, Godwin’s feminists bona fides are top notch, as he is notable for later marrying the “first” feminist, Mary Wollstonecraft, herself.

So, whatever Milton intended, is besides the point. The entire corpus of

Romantic Satanism was based on an interpretation of the Miltonic Lucifer as a hero, and there are instances where feminist scholars themselves return to Milton and apply their own combination of Romantic Satanism and late-modern ideologies of women’s liberation.[17]

In other words, by arguing from the Devil’s perspective, unknowingly or not, Milton inspired an entire following of literature gurus to take up that argument and carry it on to its logical conclusions. What did they say that Satan argued for specifically?  

In Gilbert and Gubar’s reading of Milton, Satan and Eve share a preoccupation with equality, and both stand to gain from a rebellion against the hierarchical structure epitomized by God the Father and Adam the Husband. This interpretation of Paradise Lost, they further claim, was widespread among nineteenth-century woman authors…their basic assertion is indeed accurate.[18]

So where did this grand movement of feminist equality in the West stem from, according to Paxneld? The Bible, as many modern Christians like to assert? No, at least not in the sense that they intend. Rather, it was inspired by Lucifer’s offer to the women in the Garden, as expounded by Milton, and interpreted through the Romantic poets. Lucifer’s offer to the woman of equality with God, and usurpation of her husband’s role was the impetus for feminist revolution; the literal beginning of the modern chant: “Down with the patriarchy!” This always meant, down with God and man, and it was literally inspired by the Devil. The prophecy of Scripture was surely fulfilled: “Your desire shall be contrary to your husband, but he will rule over you.”[19]

Milton’s story, inspired many, literally Satanically minded people, to take up a cause, that is nowhere spoken of in a positive light in the Bible; that of equality, and specifically feminist equality. Milton did not originate the idea of equality, nor even the modern conception of it, but he did inspire radically minded people to take up the torch of enlightening the world with this Promethean idea.[20]

There are great examples of this, but the poet that I want to focus in on, and one who stands above many in influence, is Percy Bysshe Shelley (1792-1822). Shelley, who married Mary Shelley, the famous author of Frankenstein, and who was Godwin’s and Wollstonecraft’s son-in-law, was not ambiguous about his love for Satan at all:

Nothing can exceed the grandeur and the energy of the character of the Devil as expressed in Paradise Lost…Milton’s Devil as a moral being is far superior to his God, as one who perseveres in some purpose which he has conceived to be excellent, in spite of adversity and torture, is to one who in the cold security of undoubted triumph inflicts the most horrible revenge upon his enemy, - not from any mistaken notion of bringing him to repent of a perseverance in enmity, but with the open and alleged design of exasperating him to deserve new torments.”[21]

Shelley is smitten with the devil. This is not to say that Shelley, or even many other Satanic feminists, genuinely believed in the being called Lucifer, many did not. But that is beside the point, the issue is that they were inspired by him and all that he stood for. They wanted to push society in a direction which was consistent with Satanic values, rejection of a biblical worldview being one of those values. For some, their lack of belief only made some of them less restrained in their approach to push against the structures of society, and they particularly pushed their views through the mediums of story and poetry.

Shelley’s most notable example of this is his poem The Revolt of Islam, dedicated to his equally famous wife, and capturing her father’s sympathy for the devil, and her mother’s feminist ideas.[22] Though Shelley does not use any of the traditional names of Satan in the poem, it is evident who he is writing about, and that he presents Lucifer as the hero:

A serpent battles with an eagle in the sky, but is defeated and falls from the heaven. These two animals are the shapes taken by the spirits of good and evil respectively: ‘Two powers o’er mortal things dominion hold/Ruling the world with a decided lot, Immortal, all-pervading, manifold.’ The serpent is identified as the Morning Star, making it obvious just who the figure is.[23]

Consistent with the writer’s loyalties, it is the Serpent who is identified as the good guy by the peoples of the world, in Shelley’s poem.[24] God is blamed as the originator of death, earthquakes and blight, and “his enemy the serpent in the benefactor of mankind and the enemy of all oppressors.”[25] It is abundantly clear who Shelley views as the liberator. Can you now see the inversion at work?

Shelley did this cleverly, as blasphemy is still punishable in this period. He “made God the author of evil and Satan the bringer of good, while simultaneously removing himself to some extent from Christian mythology by not using their actual names.”[26] It is thinly veiled blasphemy, designed to subvert in a Christian world.  

This serpent, that is cast to the earth, takes on a sexual relationship with a woman. This is significant that the freedom loving Satan’s primary ally in the story is a woman, because Shelley is harking back to Milton, and the Serpent in the Garden with Eve. In the poem, “Woman and Satan are both part of nature, while God and males are connected to a hierarchical, unjust civilisation.”[27] In other words: down with the patriarchy, but less obnoxiously presented than a modern feminist.

The main part of the poem presents two siblings, Cyntha and her brother Laon, who struggle against a tyrannical sultan, for liberation. The story presents Cyntha as a breaker of gender stereotypes, hell bent of the liberation of women, and as the leader of the insurrection that takes the fight to the oppressive Sultan. The revolt fails, however, and Cyntha and her brother are burned at the stake, as revolutionaries often were in the past.[28]

In this story, Shelley was actively seeking to push against the positions of the Church on women’s issues and gender roles, and presenting Cyntha in the heroes role as the rider on the glorious steed who rides to her brothers rescue highlights this.[29] As Shelley tells us he writes “in the view of kindling within the bosoms of my readers a virtuous enthusiasm for…doctrines of liberty and justice.”[30] Read: social justice, but before the term was coined.

Shelley believed that one day all gender distinctions would be abolished, and so he presented this “utopia” in some of his works.[31] While it did not sell well by itself, Revolt went on to influence many later nineteenth century feminists, and was even described by some as the greatest feminist poem written in English.[32] It was also disseminated widely in collections of Shelley’s writing, and was not his only work so explicitly lauding feminist ideals.[33]

Of course, more examples can be given, and Faxneld does provides many. But we can start to see how society was slowly influenced towards change; through story.

Stories are rarely, if ever, neutral. Most of us think that propaganda has only been pushed more blatantly in modern Hollywood films as the left gains more ascendancy. But it has always been an undercurrent of pop culture and indeed film making, and hard left agendas are anything but new. To paraphrase the comedian Owen Benjamin’s analysis on Mary Poppins, for example: this beloved children’s classic is about a witch who flies into town, to help administer behaviour modifying drugs to children, who are always behaving badly, because their mother is more focused on getting voting rights, than raising her kids. And, rather than admonish the mother, the film admonishes the father for taking his job seriously. This is blatant feminist propaganda, woven into a beloved Children’s fantasy tale.

These ideas have been subtly and often not so subtly, pushed into people’s homes, from at least the times of the Romantics. As many historians have noted, the success of Christianity in the West did not eliminate Satanic religion or ideas, it simply pushed it underground. How do underground movements gain power? Through subversive means, and frankly many of us in the West, and in the Church have been slow to wake up to this.

Satanic Feminists used story to help subvert and invert the West. People imbibed them whether in prose, verse, or novel form, or any other media. And this has accelerated with film. Indeed, the conservatives who eschew story telling should learn from this, our entire society was undone by story tellers with wicked intent. Was it one of the Greek philosophers who said control the poets, control society? At the very least, we need to recognize how this process was done, so that we can think how to undo it.

Story is powerful, and it can be used by either side. We need to recognize when it is being used against us, and it is a tool we have to take up, if we wish to see evil’s work undone.

List of References and Notes:



[1] Lewis, C.S. 2002, Mere Christianity, Harper Collins Publishers: p96

[2] Ah, the good old days of all the Baptists standing side by side against the man!

[3] Trevelyan, G.M. 1997, Life Under the Stuarts, St Edmundsbury Press: p338. 

[4] Weaver, C.D. 2008, In Search of the New Testament Church: The Baptist Story, Mercer University Press: pp11-12.

[5] Ibid, p12.

[6] Faxneld, P.2017, Satanic Feminism: Lucifer as Liberator of Woman in Nineteenth-Century Culture, Oxford University Press: p5.

[7] Ibid, p75.

[8] Ibid, p74.

[9] Ibid, p74.

[10] Ibid, p75.

[11] Ibid, p76.

[12] Ibid, pp75-76.

[13] Ibid, p76.

[14] Ibid, p77.

[15] Ibid, p77.

[16] Ibid, p77.

[17] Ibid, p19.

[18] Ibid, p19.

[19] Genesis 3:16.

[20] It is important for the reader to note, that I am aware that there were currents arguing for different versions of society wide equality predating, and also concurrent with Milton. I have written about that in other works and am continuing to write about that in other works. At this stage, I have traced the idea of “Equality” in the sense that we think of it: “All men being created equal” to Nicholar of Susa, it is transmitted through Hobbes, and is exposited by Locke, who had great influence on the American founders who nearly exactly quote Locke in the Declaration of Independence. So, I am in no way arguing that Milton invented the idea of equality, I am showing that he put it, in its right context: as a Luciferian ideal, not an actual righteous ideal. For further discussions about the idea of equality, refer to my article (here, or here), read Martin Van Creveld’s, Equality the Impossible Quest, or you can continue with this series, and another I am writing on where equality comes from. It is fundamental for this piece to recognize this: the great socialist and feminist movement, which has wrought great change in our society were not inspired by Christianity, but were deliberate attacks on Christianity, which is patriarchal and hierarchical, not egalitarian.

[21] Faxneld, P.2017, Satanic Feminism: Lucifer as Liberator of Woman in Nineteenth-Century Culture, Oxford University Press: P79.

[22] Ibid, pp80-81.

[23] Ibid, p81.

[24] Ibid, p81.

[25] Ibid p81.

[26] Ibid, p82.

[27] Ibid 82.

[28] Ibid, pp82-83.

[29] Ibid, p83

[30] Ibid, p83.

[31] Ibid, p84.

[32] Ibid, p84

[33] Ibid, p84.

 

All scripture references are from the ESV translation.