A couple of
days ago I wrote a piece for my blog titled: What Ended Western Civilisation? I
hypothesized about what some future historians would surmise were the chief
causes of the decline of the West. But this time I want people to consider something
else, what created western civilisation.
It was a
combination of things:
- The legacy of Greek Philosophy and Roman Law,
- With the nations of Europe,
- Combined with Christianity.
These three pillars
are what made the West. None of these three alone were sufficient, all three of
them together were necessary.
But I’d also
like to note something else. Christianity is not just responsible for helping
create Western civilisation, it is also responsible for creating the nations of
Europe and giving them their sense of national, rather than simply tribal,
identity.
Here is a good
example of how this came about shared on the Kings and General’s channel:
How the Norse Became Christian.
This video gives a brief summary of how Christianity made the Scandinavian
nations. Note how much the commentator emphasizes how Christianity helped make
entire nations understand their national identity.
There is a
wicked trend in the church today for many Christian intellectuals to say that nationalism
is in opposition to Christianity. But the remarkable thing about this comment
is that it shows how ignorant many Christian thinkers are of how Christianity
helped the nations of Europe understand their national identities.
This
happened in similar ways across the West. Missionaries would move into a pagan
area, share the gospel with leaders of nations, kings and nobles, and once
converted these kings and nobles would lend their power to the conversion of
their peoples, as much as was possible. Within a few generations these nations
were then centering their understanding of their identity around the Lord Jesus
Christ. In this process entire peoples would come to understand their shared
heritage and identity, and entire nations, such as Denmark and Norway, among
many others, were formed.
A good
example of how this would happen is that once a Church network had established
itself in a nation, the church would begin the task of translating the Bible
into the dominant local language of the people. This happened across the West.
Modern
Protestant missionaries and Bible translators tend to practice a rather inefficient
policy of seeking to translate the Bible into the heart language of every
tribal group they can come into contact with. You may have heard such advocates
talk about how there are so-many thousands of unreached people groups with no bible
in their language. What they are referring to here is the existence of tiny
tribal groups with variations of languages often related to other localized
tribal languages. These Protestants will then seek to devote time and resources
to getting a Bible to every single one of these small tribal groups. This takes
a lot of time and energy, and has to be repeated for every one of these tribal
groups.
The medieval
church took a far wiser approach. They would tend to translate the Bible into
the dominant language of an entire collection of tribes, say in Norway, or Bulgaria,
or Russia. Then they would teach the leading men of these peoples to read and write
this language, along with Latin or Greek, and this would have the effect of
within a whole generation or two an entire nation was forged with a shared
identity around Christ, the Church, and their shared national language. This
was a far more successful way of bringing nations to Christ. It reached more
people at a faster rate, and had the side effect of helping forge national identities
across Europe.
Of course, nations
and national identities existed before Christianity, but Christianity helped many
nations to formalize their national identities and expressions. Which is really
fitting because it is God who created the nations, and therefore, it makes
sense that his Church would help formerly pagan nations assert their
identities.
Many
Protestants will have some issues with some of the strategies of the early
Church around converting nations. But it must be said that the medieval church
had a far better record of converting nations, than the modern Protestant
Church. This is just a fact, and therefore we should learn from these aspects of
their strategy which are consistent with God’s word.
Nationalism
is not only not in opposition to Christianity. Christianity made itself a
servant of the nationalist spirit again and again in the past in order to
direct peoples, as nations, to place themselves in submission to Christ. This
is the end goal of Christian Nationalism; that nations would lift up the glory
of Christ, the Kings of Kings, as supreme. This is also a key pillar of
authentic western civilisation.
No comments:
Post a Comment