Every empire comes to an end. But not necessarily for the exact same reasons. There are similarities of course, because all empires overreach. All empires end up with entrenched bureaucracies which bleed initiative and effectiveness from the imperial efforts. All empires face competition from either peer enemies, or a collection of enemies that match or exceed their abilities. But the specific reasons why empires get in these situations of decline can vary. Britain lost its empire because Churchill, and the British leadership of his generation, squandered it on ensuring that Germany did not become a true continental power that could rival them and France. The Soviet Union lost its empire because its founding ideology, communism, undermined its ability to outproduce competing societies, like the United States. But the overarching similarity is that empires always collapse because they go too far in their goals and actions. They overreach.
The same will happen with the United States,
“…when objectives are
greater than measures, then defeat is certain. Not all of today's statesmen and
strategists are clear on this point. The 1996 U.S. Department of Defense Report
contains this premise from President Clinton: "As the world's most powerful
nation, we have a leadership obligation, and when our interests and sense of values
are subject to great danger we will take action." When he spoke those
words, obviously even Clinton was unaware that national interests and sense of
values are strategic objectives of two completely different scales. If we say
that the former is an objective which American power can protect through
action, the latter is neither an objective that its power can achieve nor is an
objective which the United States should pursue outside its own territory.
"World's number one," an ideology corresponding to
"isolationism," always makes the Americans tend to pursue unlimited
objectives as they expand their national power. But this is a tendency which in
the end will lead to tragedy. A company which has limited resources but which
is nevertheless keen to take on unlimited responsibilities is headed for only
one possible outcome, and that is bankruptcy.”[1]
In other words, the United States believes that it is their
role, or calling, to ensure that other nations are conformed to their values and beliefs of
nationhood. They want to use their limited resources to achieve this unlimited
goal, and this will inevitably fail. To put it another way the United States
wants to conform the rest of the world to its image, and it simply does not
have the power to do this, but it is ideologically driven to keep trying to do
this. So this can only end up in disaster.
Empires often want to conform the world into their own
image. Rome sought to do this through the Pax Romana. Alexander the Great
sought to do this with Hellenization. But empires always fail to achieve this
goal because even mighty empires have limited power. And also, the more
powerful they get, the more the people of all nations are drawn into the centre
of the empire and this changes the empire from within and causes it to
eventually collapse in on itself.
By the end of the Roman Empire it was neither Roman in
nationality, nor language, or even culture. It was a small state on the Bosphorus (Byzantium)
that spoke Greek and traced its population’s lineage to many different peoples.
The American Empire is no longer led by the sons of the revolution, but by a
collection of foreign peoples from all over the world, some European and many
not, and very few of those leaders are of the Anglo-Saxon heritage of the dominant founding peoples
of the United States. They have been overcome by the world, they sought to overcome.
The United States will fail because it is seeking to achieve something which it just does not have the ability to achieve: the conforming of the whole world to its image. The United States may have gotten into this situation for different reasons than Rome, Greece, or other empires, but the result will be the same, total and utter collapse. The irony is that the more an empire seeks to conform the world to its image, the more the world ends up conforming that empire to the various images of the people that overcome that empire. As this process of demographic change increases, the more the empire is corrupted from the inside and the less capable it becomes of achieving its overarching goals.
You would think nations would have learnt this lesson by
now. Some may have, but the United States is learning this lesson the hard way
again in our time, and as a result the world is in for some years of serious
tumults.
List of References
[1] Col.
Qiao Liang and Col. Wang Xiangsui, 1999, Unrestricted Warfare, p.180.
The fall of the United States is a strategic plan from the globalist powers that be. They aim to accomplish a centralized system, step by step. BRICS+ is not an organic uprising, it's technocrat created and controlled. Buying into the carefully crafted narrative is in fact playing right into the hand of those that conduct the social engineering operation. Marxists theory is what's driving the ship and shaping public opinion. The Haves and the Have Nots tactic of warfare divides and conquers. And in this case, with technology as a weapon via media... it's a global propaganda campaign. What's happening to America is happening because the powers that be are setting up a new geographic HQ. God bless.
ReplyDeleteNailed it. Marxist theory is at the bottom of most ills in the world. When the Berlin Wall came down that was the point when communism spread like a lanced boil around the world. We all thought communism was dead until we saw the hammer and sickle still flying proudly over the Kremlin, Beijing and PyongYang. Empires come and go but Marxism keeps leaning until it gets exactly what it wants.
DeleteChris D