Skinsuit Church

"Skinsuit Church" - a church with all the outward forms of dress and structure of the Church, but an inward rotting core from the pits of hell. 

That's not an official definition, that is just my definition. But there is no doubt that increasing numbers of churches and denominations are being led by the Devil's servants. They outwardly have the form of traditional Churches, but are filled with wickedness. 

There have been issues in the Anglican (Episcopalian) Church for sometime, but they have again been rammed home:

"The Church of England has admitted it doesn’t haven’t an official definition for a woman.

Rt Rev Robert Innes, a senior Bishop at the Church of England, said the term woman was previously “self-evident”, but now “additional care” was needed.

During questions to the General Synod, lay member Adam Kendry asked: “What is the Church of England’s definition of a woman?”

To which Mr Innes replied: “There is no official definition, which reflects the fact that until fairly recently definitions of this kind were thought to be self-evident, as reflected in the marriage liturgy."

This is not a church, it's a mere shell of a Church. A Church which cannot define a man and a woman is a useless organization. There are many great Anglicans who would stand against this nonsense as well, but much their leadership has been overcome by Satanic nonsense, as is evident in other areas as well, such as LGBT issues, and women's ordination.

But it's not just Anglicans, I wonder what would happen in many churches and denominational gatherings if the leaders were asked this question? 

The spirit of the day, egalitarianism, is anti-woman. The whole focus of egalitarianism is to reform women into the image of man. This is what is being done. This wasn't obvious to everyone at first, but it was the stated goal of the early feminists from the beginning, such Percy Bysshe Shelley, the son-in-law of Mary Wollstonecraft:

Shelley’s intentions are clear. In The Revolt of Isalm Shelley was attempting to create a feminist counter-narrative myth to demonstrate ideological opposition to the dominant Christian view of gender roles.” Shelley’s goal, as an advocate of feminism, like his parents-in-law, is to frame God and the patriarchy ordained by God, as the force of oppression, and encourage women to ‘realize’ that they can smash all gender boundaries.

“Shelley’s revolutionary Satanism is combined with what can, without much hesitation, be described as a feminist ideal. This is further reflected, for example, in how Cythna takes on a role coded as masculine, when she comes charging on a black steed, sword in hand, to rescue her brother. Shelley held a utopian vision that gender differences, ‘detestable distinctions’, as he called them in a letter, would ‘surely be abolished in a future state of being’.”

The goal was always to smash "detestable gender distinctions". This is what smash the patriarchy always meant. This was the driving force behind early feminism. And subscribers to its cororally ideology egalitarianism are becoming increasingly confused about what a woman is because of this. 

A woman is man's adult female helpmate, created by God to join with man in holy matrimony, bear his children and follow his leadership. SHE was designed for this powerful role. The Bible defines woman clearly, but egalitarians hate what the Bible says about the woman and her role and want to instead forge her into a pseudo-man, a woman who does all the things man was ordered to do like lead men and women, provide, teach in the Church, etc. The only logical end to this is people not knowing what a woman is. And the Anglicans just got there. 

This may not have been your intentions in holding to egalitarian views, but know if you do hold to them, you've bought into a evil lie with a logical conclusion that is now being fulfilled in our day.