Book Sale

Tuesday, 30 September 2025

We Cannot Solve All The World’s Problems

 


President Trump has proposed a 20 point peace plan that includes him governing Gaza with an international board, and pouring military and civilian resources into the strip. The plan does not appear to have been accepted by the Palestinians yet, “A reporter asked if any Palestinians had been consulted on the plan, but was ignored.”[1] This plan appears to be just another unilateral movement by the US and Israel which will end up being used to justify ongoing hostilities when it is rejected by a side not even consulted. Consider what happened the last time Hamas leaders got together to discuss a US peace proposal.

The outline of this plan is absolutely absurd anyway. I have posted it below if you want to read it.

I have a better idea.

Cut all funding to Israel. Cut all funding to Palestine. Cut all funding to the Middle Eastern countries around them, and let them sort out their own region. Stop trying to solve other people messes. Britain tried to solve this Middle East issue 100 years ago, and they were driven out (many people forget this, but it is the history of what happened). In reality, they were a key part in creating this crisis, so it is kind of funny that Tony Blair is being put forward to help manage Gaza in this new plan.  

Wipe the dust off your feet, leave the region to its own devices. There is no biblical law which calls for sovereign nations to solve the problems of sovereign nations far away. None. The idea that we are required to do this is a pretence of imperialism and globalism. Thinking you should solve the problems of another nations is a product also of pride and foolishness. The Bible says this, “Whoever meddles in a quarrel not his own is like one who takes a passing dog by the ears” (Prov. 26:17). The West keeps being bitten, but won’t learn wisdom.

We in the West have spent too much blood and treasure on foreign countries. This needs to stop. Part of the reason places like China and India are rising is they have the advantage of feeling no need to solve the Middle East quagmire. They are smart. We should be smart like them. They clearly did the math and came to the right, moral and wise decision. That no country, no matter how powerful, can solve all the worlds issues, nor should they try.

Both sides, all sides, in the Middle East have become skilled at dragging other nations into their B.S. (Bad Socialisation). The sooner we are done with it, the better.

Offer material aid to help rebuild to anyone from those countries who wants to return, but make sure they know it is a permanent return. They are going home, they can make it their home.  

Send missionaries, as this is God's command, and really our best hope for the region. But otherwise, end the relationship.

The reason I have the image above for this article is because Israel is to the US what Cleopatra was to Marcus Antony. A self-destructive personal passion. I read volume two of Plutarch’s lives recently, and I am currently reading Herod’s Life by Josephus, and both these ancient first century works show that Antony’s irrational passion for the former lover of his friend, Julius Caesar, was largely what brought him undone. Herod’s assessment of Cleopatra as the woman that would bring his friend Antony down was spot on. Herod the Great may not have been a good man, but he was not stupid. Cleopatra even tried to drag him into conflict with her to turn Antony against Herod, but Herod avoided this with skill.

It's time to let the Middle East solve their own problems. In fact, this is what sovereignty means; self rule. Countries that rely on handouts for their existence are not sovereign, they are pseudo-colonies. Time to stop the welfare Queen dependency once and for all. This goes for many nations in the region that profit from western handouts.  

As for Australia, the best we can do is what Marcus Antony's friends did for him, not let Cleopatra drag them into her games. He was set on his passion, it appears the US is set on its passion to. But this does not mean we need to take part.

Trump's 20-point peace proposal

  1. Gaza will be a deradicalised terror-free zone that does not pose a threat to its neighbours.
  2. Gaza will be redeveloped for the benefit of the people of Gaza, who have suffered more than enough.
  3. If both sides agree to this proposal, the war will immediately end. Israeli forces will withdraw to the agreed-upon line to prepare for a hostage release. During this time, all military operations, including aerial and artillery bombardment, will be suspended, and battle lines will remain frozen until conditions are met for the complete staged withdrawal.
  4. Within 72 hours of Israel publicly accepting this agreement, all hostages, alive and deceased, will be returned.
  5. Once all hostages are released, Israel will release 250 life sentence prisoners plus 1,700 Gazans who were detained after October 7th 2023, including all women and children detained in that context. For every Israeli hostage whose remains are released, Israel will release the remains of 15 deceased Gazans.
  6. Once all hostages are returned, Hamas members who commit to peaceful co-existence and to decommission their weapons will be given amnesty. Members of Hamas who wish to leave Gaza will be provided safe passage to receiving countries.
  7. Upon acceptance of this agreement, full aid will be immediately sent into the Gaza Strip. At a minimum, aid quantities will be consistent with what was included in the January 19, 2025, agreement regarding humanitarian aid, including rehabilitation of infrastructure (water, electricity, sewage), rehabilitation of hospitals and bakeries, and entry of necessary equipment to remove rubble and open roads.
  8. Entry of distribution and aid in the Gaza Strip will proceed without interference from the two parties through the United Nations and its agencies, and the Red Crescent, in addition to other international institutions not associated in any manner with either party. Opening the Rafah crossing in both directions will be subject to the same mechanism implemented under the January 19, 2025, agreement.
  9. Gaza will be governed under the temporary transitional governance of a technocratic, apolitical Palestinian committee, responsible for delivering the day-to-day running of public services and municipalities for the people in Gaza. This committee will be made up of qualified Palestinians and international experts, with oversight and supervision by a new international transitional body, the "Board of Peace," which will be headed and chaired by President Donald J. Trump, with other members and heads of State to be announced, including Former Prime Minister Tony Blair. This body will set the framework and handle the funding for the redevelopment of Gaza until such time as the Palestinian Authority has completed its reform program, as outlined in various proposals, including President Trump's peace plan in 2020 and the Saudi-French proposal, and can securely and effectively take back control of Gaza. This body will call on best international standards to create modern and efficient governance that serves the people of Gaza and is conducive to attracting investment.
  10. A Trump economic development plan to rebuild and energise Gaza will be created by convening a panel of experts who have helped birth some of the thriving modern miracle cities in the Middle East. Many thoughtful investment proposals and exciting development ideas have been crafted by well-meaning international groups, and will be considered to synthesise the security and governance frameworks to attract and facilitate these investments that will create jobs, opportunity, and hope for future Gaza.
  11. A special economic zone will be established with preferred tariff and access rates to be negotiated with participating countries.
  12. No one will be forced to leave Gaza, and those who wish to leave will be free to do so and free to return. We will encourage people to stay and offer them the opportunity to build a better Gaza.
  13. Hamas and other factions agree to not have any role in the governance of Gaza, directly, indirectly, or in any form. All military, terror, and offensive infrastructure, including tunnels and weapon production facilities, will be destroyed and not rebuilt. There will be a process of demilitarisation of Gaza under the supervision of independent monitors, which will include placing weapons permanently beyond use through an agreed process of decommissioning, and supported by an internationally funded buy back and reintegration program all verified by the independent monitors. New Gaza will be fully committed to building a prosperous economy and to peaceful coexistence with their neighbours.
  14. A guarantee will be provided by regional partners to ensure that Hamas, and the factions, comply with their obligations and that New Gaza poses no threat to its neighbours or its people.
  15. The United States will work with Arab and international partners to develop a temporary International Stabilization Force (ISF) to immediately deploy in Gaza. The ISF will train and provide support to vetted Palestinian police forces in Gaza, and will consult with Jordan and Egypt who have extensive experience in this field. This force will be the long-term internal security solution. The ISF will work with Israel and Egypt to help secure border areas, along with newly trained Palestinian police forces. It is critical to prevent munitions from entering Gaza and to facilitate the rapid and secure flow of goods to rebuild and revitalise Gaza. A deconfliction mechanism will be agreed upon by the parties.
  16. Israel will not occupy or annex Gaza. As the ISF establishes control and stability, the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) will withdraw based on standards, milestones, and timeframes linked to demilitarisation that will be agreed upon between the IDF, ISF, the guarantors, and the United States, with the objective of a secure Gaza that no longer poses a threat to Israel, Egypt, or its citizens. Practically, the IDF will progressively hand over the Gaza territory it occupies to the ISF according to an agreement they will make with the transitional authority until they are withdrawn completely from Gaza, save for a security perimeter presence that will remain until Gaza is properly secure from any resurgent terror threat.
  17. In the event Hamas delays or rejects this proposal, the above, including the scaled-up aid operation, will proceed in the terror-free areas handed over from the IDF to the ISF.
  18. An interfaith dialogue process will be established based on the values of tolerance and peaceful co-existence to try and change mindsets and narratives of Palestinians and Israelis by emphasising the benefits that can be derived from peace.
  19. While Gaza re-development advances and when the PA reform program is faithfully carried out, the conditions may finally be in place for a credible pathway to Palestinian self-determination and statehood, which we recognise as the aspiration of the Palestinian people.
  20. The United States will establish a dialogue between Israel and the Palestinians to agree on a political horizon for peaceful and prosperous co-existence.

List of References

Monday, 29 September 2025

Episode 23 - What Does God Replace? Let’s Address Replacement Theology

 




You can watch the live stream of this study tonight between 8pm to 9pm AEST here.

Replacement theology. You will hear this word bandied about. I have addressed this topic on my blog briefly a few times, and noted that what the Bible teaches can better be called ‘Replenishment Theology’. However, I had the opportunity to address this explicitly in a recent sermon and I wanted to share that with you on my livestream Bible study tonight.

This is not directly part of the Revelation Study, but it is relevant. Many people, including myself see in Revelation that God is judging his apostate people and he is seeking to encourage his faithful people and seeking to spur them on to endurance. And for some of these people this will raise the concept of does God replace Israel? And this idea of what does God actually replace is essential to understanding this larger issue of who God's people are. Revelation 14 even uses some of the same sort of imagery of the vine that I will address in this topic. So, I thought it would be used to make this sermon part of our Revelation study. 

You can read the notes here. But I encourage you to watch the livestream as well, or instead, because I expand on what I share here and also use a very visible prop demonstration that helps reinforce this consistent theme in the Bible. May you be blessed by this study.  

Introduction

Last week we saw how Jesus claimed to be the Godman. That is what he meant when he called himself the Son of Man. Yes, the phrase could mean human one is some contexts. But not the way Jesus uses it. He is the divine Son of Man from Daniel 7, and when he calls himself the Son of Man riding on the clouds of heaven in front of the high priests they accuse him of blasphemy, because they understood what he meant: he was claiming not just to be a god, but to be the Lord of Lords; Yehovah, Yahveh, Adonai, El Shaddai, and he was standing right in front of them.

That is what he was claiming. And they knew it.

I think many Christians have this idea of the Bible that the God of the Old Testament is the Father, and now the Son is here, and he reveals the Father to us more but he wasn’t really around that much before. However, Jesus is all over the Old Testament. Jesus is the God of the Old Testament. God the Son, God the Holy Spirit and God the Father are there, all throughout. They are just explained in more detail in the New Testament. 

For instance, John says this, “Isaiah said these things because he saw his glory and spoke of him” (John 12:41). Who did Isaiah see? He saw Jesus’s glory. This is what John is saying. What passage does this refer to? Isaiah 6, where we read, “1 In the year that King Uzziah died I saw the Lord sitting upon a throne, high and lifted up; and the train of his robe filled the temple… 5 And I said: “Woe is me! For I am lost; for I am a man of unclean lips, and I dwell in the midst of a people of unclean lips; for my eyes have seen the King, the Lord of hosts!” Isaiah saw the glory of Yehovah, he saw Jesus. The Son has always revealed the Father.

In other words, in the person of Jesus the God of the universe, the God of creation, the God who made the stars, the God who made the mountains and who called Abraham out of Babylon was walking among mankind. This is what we mean by the Son of God, God the Son. And we will see in this passage that he is not happy with the state of his people.

Today we are going to start to look at Matthew 21 where Jesus is going to survey his vineyard. He is going to escalate his confrontation with the leaders of Israel from here on in, until it leads to them killing him. But the message he wants them to understand is that if they were truly God’s people they would be bearing fruit. This is the same message Jeremiah preached, that Isaiah preached and so many other prophets. I want you to hold an image of a tree in your head. A tree with fruit bearing branches and barren branches, because we will come back to that. Let’s see how Jesus warns those who do not bear fruit?

It Will Be Taken Away (vv. 45-46) – Let’s begin at the end of this chapter, Jesus is here to tell them that the kingdom is no longer theirs,

“43 Therefore I tell you, the kingdom of God will be taken away from you and given to a people producing its fruits. 44 And the one who falls on this stone will be broken to pieces; and when it falls on anyone, it will crush him. 45 When the chief priests and the Pharisees heard his parables, they perceived that he was speaking about them. 46 And although they were seeking to arrest him, they feared the crowds, because they held him to be a prophet.”

So, what does Jesus say here? He says that the kingdom of God, or the vineyard of the Lord of hosts, Israel, is going to be taken from them, and given to someone else. If you take this away and give it to someone else. What have you done? You have replaced them. You have taken it from one group of people and given it to someone else.

What is being taken away in this context? Their stewardship of God’s nation and citizenship in his kingdom. They are being cast out of God’s people in other words.

So, this naturally raises the question has God replaced Israel? Now, just asking this question freaks some people out. Already I can see in some people’s faces where is Matt going with this? Well, I want us to go where Jesus goes. But before we do that we have to do a Biblical history lesson. So, we are to start by going back in time to Abraham and the Patriarchs.

I believe we have to do this to fully understand what is happening in Matthew 21. You see, in the Bible the name Israel is synonymous with the people of God. How could God replace that? Well, as he says, “43 Therefore I tell you, the kingdom of God will be taken away from you and given to a people producing its fruits.” These are Jesus’ words, not mine. But to fully understand what is happening here, we have to understand God’s relationship to his people has never changed. Remember keep an image of a tree in your head. God has always replaced dead branches in his people with living branches.

He doesn’t replace the tree, he has always replaced branches. We’ll come back to what that means later on.

Faith Never Flesh (The Patriarchs) – We are not going to recount the patriarchs’ entire story, as that would take us too long. But I want us to focus on a key thread from Genesis that Paul explores in the New Testament. God promised Abram that he would have a son, in fact many sons, uncountable descendants, “5 And he brought him outside and said, “Look toward heaven, and number the stars, if you are able to number them.” Then he said to him, “So shall your offspring be.” 6 And he believed the Lord, and he counted it to him as righteousness” (Gen. 15:5-6). Then after this God promises Abram that he will possess the land of Canaan and he makes a covenant with him.

This is the passage Paul uses to show how justification works, it is by faith in God, not through works of the flesh. This is key, foundational. But it is not just foundational to understanding individual salvation, it is foundational to understanding how God’s kingdom works. It is all by faith. All of it.

Not long after this Abram and Sarai hatch a plan to have a son through Hagar, the slave girl (Gen. 16). We all know that son as Ishmael. Why do they do this? Because they are seeking to fulfil the promise of God in their flesh, Genesis 16:2, “2 And Sarai said to Abram, “Behold now, the Lord has prevented me from bearing children. Go in to my servant; it may be that I shall obtain children by her.” We human beings have this sinful flaw where we want to achieve the things of God through the flesh. And part of this flaw is that we often believe teachings that encourage this.

But God makes it plain to Abram that this is not the child through which the promise will come, God will give Abraham a son through Sarai, Genesis 17:15-21,

“15 And God said to Abraham, “As for Sarai your wife, you shall not call her name Sarai, but Sarah shall be her name. 16 I will bless her, and moreover, I will give you a son by her. I will bless her, and she shall become nations; kings of peoples shall come from her.” 17 Then Abraham fell on his face and laughed and said to himself, “Shall a child be born to a man who is a hundred years old? Shall Sarah, who is ninety years old, bear a child?” 18 And Abraham said to God, “Oh that Ishmael might live before you!”…21 But I will establish my covenant with Isaac, whom Sarah shall bear to you at this time next year.”

If you read the passage you will see that God is going to bless Ishmael and make him a great nation (17:20). But it is through Isaac that the promise will be fulfilled and what is the promise? We read it in the same passage,

“1 When Abram was ninety-nine years old the Lord appeared to Abram and said to him, “I am God Almighty; walk before me, and be blameless, 2 that I may make my covenant between me and you, and may multiply you greatly.” 3 Then Abram fell on his face. And God said to him, 4 “Behold, my covenant is with you, and you shall be the father of a multitude of nations. 5 No longer shall your name be called Abram, but your name shall be Abraham, for I have made you the father of a multitude of nations. 6 I will make you exceedingly fruitful, and I will make you into nations, and kings shall come from you. 7 And I will establish my covenant between me and you and your offspring after you throughout their generations for an everlasting covenant, to be God to you and to your offspring after you. 8 And I will give to you and to your offspring after you the land of your sojournings, all the land of Canaan, for an everlasting possession, and I will be their God” (Gen. 17:1-5).

God is adamant that the promise of Abraham will not be fulfilled through Hagar and Ishmael but through Sarah and Isaac. He is adamant.

But Ishmael is Abraham’s son. He is his flesh and blood. God is going to bless Ishmael and make him a great nation as well. But the promise to bless the world will not be fulfilled through him.

Why? Why could it not come through Ishmael? Why? This seems unfair, doesn’t it. Ishmael did no wrong. Hagar did no wrong. Abraham clearly loved him. So why could it not be Ishmael? In fact, here is a better question: why did God choose an old man and a woman far past childbearing age to be the couple through which he was going to make many descendants? Why did God do this?

Simple: because he was showing Abraham, Sarah and all who would ever hear their story that the promise is not received by the children of the flesh, but only those who have faith, Hebrews 11:8-12,

“8 By faith Abraham obeyed when he was called to go out to a place that he was to receive as an inheritance. And he went out, not knowing where he was going. 9 By faith he went to live in the land of promise, as in a foreign land, living in tents with Isaac and Jacob, heirs with him of the same promise. 10 For he was looking forward to the city that has foundations, whose designer and builder is God. 11 By faith Sarah herself received power to conceive, even when she was past the age, since she considered him faithful who had promised. 12 Therefore from one man, and him as good as dead, were born descendants as many as the stars of heaven and as many as the innumerable grains of sand by the seashore.”

Holding the land, the promises, the inheritance, was always about faith, not the flesh.

Listen carefully, because if you go wrong here you go wrong on most of the scriptures. God is teaching us that the promises of God were only ever for the children of faith, not the children of the flesh.

John the Baptist got it:

“7 But when he saw many of the Pharisees and Sadducees coming to his baptism, he said to them, “You brood of vipers! Who warned you to flee from the wrath to come? 8 Bear fruit in keeping with repentance. 9 And do not presume to say to yourselves, ‘We have Abraham as our father,’ for I tell you, God is able from these stones to raise up children for Abraham. 10 Even now the axe is laid to the root of the trees. Every tree therefore that does not bear good fruit is cut down and thrown into the fire” (Matt. 3:7-10).

Do you see that same theme? Branches that do not bear fruit are cut out. They always have been and always will be. It is how God’s kingdom works. The children of the flesh have never inherited God’s kingdom and never will, unless they also have faith.

Abraham had many sons, Ishamel, and then more, “25 Abraham took another wife, whose name was Keturah. 2 She bore him Zimran, Jokshan, Medan, Midian, Ishbak, and Shuah.“ (Gen. 25:1-2). But only one got the inheritance, “5 Abraham gave all he had to Isaac” (Gen. 25:5). Why? Because he was the child of promise.

Isaac was the child of promise and was he told that the promise would continue through the flesh? No. We read that God said this to Rebekah, Genesis 25:22-23, “So she went to inquire of the Lord. 23 And the Lord said to her, “Two nations are in your womb,  and two peoples from within you shall be divided; the one shall be stronger than the other, the older shall serve the younger.”

The older is Esau (red) and the younger is Jacob (deceiver). The laws and customs of the culture in that era, and most of history, said that the inheritance should go to the first-born son. It was his birthright. This is what the flesh required.

It is no small thing to change this.

But God is teaching his people that it is never by flesh, but by the promise that his descendants are accounted. Paul makes a big deal of this in his writings,

“6 But it is not as though the word of God has failed. For not all who are descended from Israel belong to Israel, 7 and not all are children of Abraham because they are his offspring, but “Through Isaac shall your offspring be named.” 8 This means that it is not the children of the flesh who are the children of God, but the children of the promise are counted as offspring. 9 For this is what the promise said: “About this time next year I will return, and Sarah shall have a son.” 10 And not only so, but also when Rebekah had conceived children by one man, our forefather Isaac, 11 though they were not yet born and had done nothing either good or bad—in order that God's purpose of election might continue, not because of works but because of him who calls— 12 she was told, “The older will serve the younger.” 13 As it is written, “Jacob I loved, but Esau I hated” (Romans 9:6-12).

Do you see how everything I was showing you is foundational to Paul’s theology? This thread of understanding that it is not by flesh but by faith that we receive the promises is key to understanding God’s kingdom.

This message is reiterated again and again and again. Who was Jacob’s first son? It was Reuben. But it is said about Judah that his brothers will bow before him,

“8 Judah, your brothers shall praise you; your hand shall be on the neck of your enemies; your father's sons shall bow down before you. 9 Judah is a lion's cub; from the prey, my son, you have gone up. He stooped down; he crouched as a lion and as a lioness; who dares rouse him? 10 The scepter shall not depart from Judah, nor the ruler's staff from between his feet, until tribute comes to him; and to him shall be the obedience of the peoples” (Gen. 49:10).

Reuben lost his inheritance with his father because of his behaviour. But it was Judah who confessed before Joseph the sins they had committed against him, and it was Judah who promised to take his brothers place, “33 Now therefore, please let your servant remain instead of the boy as a servant to my lord, and let the boy go back with his brothers. 34 For how can I go back to my father if the boy is not with me? I fear to see the evil that would find my father” (Gen. 44:33-34).

By the flesh Reuben was owed the place of prominence, but the kingdom of God does not work according to the flesh. It works according to faith and faithfulness. This is how God set it up. But the Pharisees and the Jewish people had largely forgotten this. They thought they were owed the kingdom because of who they were. But this was never the case.

The Exodus – We see this principle throughout the whole Bible. Take the Exodus for example. The entire nation who came out of Egypt who were over the age of twenty were forbidden from entering the promise land,

“28 Say to them, ‘As I live, declares the Lord, what you have said in my hearing I will do to you: 29 your dead bodies shall fall in this wilderness, and of all your number, listed in the census from twenty years old and upward, who have grumbled against me, 30 not one shall come into the land where I swore that I would make you dwell, except Caleb the son of Jephunneh and Joshua the son of Nun. 31 But your little ones, who you said would become a prey, I will bring in, and they shall know the land that you have rejected” (Num. 14:28-31).

Was it unjust for God to exclude the entire nation over twenty, except two men, from entering the land promised to them? They were Hebrews. They were descendants of Abraham. They were even saved from Egypt and the power of Pharoah, which is a picture of our salvation from the oppression of sin and the devil.

How could these descendants of Abraham, these Israelites, who were there at the 10 plagues, the parting of the sea, the splitting of the rock, at Mt Sinai and the giving of the law, not be able to inherit the promise?

Simple: because it is only those who receive it by faith who can inherit it. They saw the Nephilim and the mighty inhabitants of the land, and they lost their faith. They looked with eyes of flesh, not eyes of faith.

As Hebrews says,

“12 Take care, brothers, lest there be in any of you an evil, unbelieving heart, leading you to fall away from the living God…16 For who were those who heard and yet rebelled? Was it not all those who left Egypt led by Moses? 17 And with whom was he provoked for forty years? Was it not with those who sinned, whose bodies fell in the wilderness? 18 And to whom did he swear that they would not enter his rest, but to those who were disobedient? 19 So we see that they were unable to enter because of unbelief” (Heb. 4:12, 16-19)

They were unable to enter because of faith. It really appears that there is a consistent theme in the bible when it comes to God’s kingdom, doesn’t it. 

And to drive the point home even more, a Canaanite got to inherit the promise that the descendants of the flesh did not. Her name is Rahab, “8 Before the men lay down, she came up to them on the roof 9 and said to the men, “I know that the Lord has given you the land, and that the fear of you has fallen upon us, and that all the inhabitants of the land melt away before you” (Josh. 2:8-9).

Compare Rahab to the cowardly Hebrews. They feared the people in Canaan, but the people of Canann were afraid of them and their God. But notice also that Rahab had believed the promise, “I know that the Lord has given you the land…” That’s faith.

Rahab was not descended from Abraham. She was a Canaanite. She ran a brothel of all things. But she believed the promise. And because she believed it she inherited it. In fact, she was Boaz’ mother, Matthew 1:5, “and Salmon the father of Boaz by Rahab, and Boaz the father of Obed by Ruth, and Obed the father of Jesse,…”

So, you can see there is a consistent theme: the promises of God are secure and sure. But they are not and never were intended for the flesh, but only for those who trust in God and his promises. God went out of his way to drive this message home to the Israelites,

“13 And if you will indeed obey my commandments that I command you today, to love the Lord your God, and to serve him with all your heart and with all your soul, 14 he will give the rain for your land in its season, the early rain and the later rain, that you may gather in your grain and your wine and your oil. 15 And he will give grass in your fields for your livestock, and you shall eat and be full. 16 Take care lest your heart be deceived, and you turn aside and serve other gods and worship them; 17 then the anger of the Lord will be kindled against you, and he will shut up the heavens, so that there will be no rain, and the land will yield no fruit, and you will perish quickly off the good land that the Lord is giving you” (Deut. 11:13-17).

All of the promises in the Bible of what we can receive come with an implied condition: if you continue in faith. If you believe. Even when this condition is not stated in that verse, just keep reading you will find it.

Part of the problem is people don’t read the Bible in context. They read a verse for the day, then they listen to a sermon which gives a verse for the day, and then they get a skewed view of the promises of God.

God never intended his promises to be inherited by flesh. Whether the land in Canaan or the new promise land in heaven. Access to the kingdom of God has always been by faith. Only branches connected by faith bear fruit. 

The vineyard of the Lord of hosts is Israel, and like any good gardener he prunes out the bad branches so that they can be replaced with branches that bear good fruit. So, let’s now turn to that theme.

Pruning the Branches – Remember, I am setting the scene for you this morning for what Jesus is doing in Matthew 21. Remember, he is the King of Israel. They will welcome him as a king and then not long after they kill him. But remember Jesus does this in Matthew 21, “18 In the morning, as he was returning to the city, he became hungry. 19 And seeing a fig tree by the wayside, he went to it and found nothing on it but only leaves. And he said to it, “May no fruit ever come from you again!” And the fig tree withered at once.” This is no random event. Jesus has just cleansed the temple. He went into the temple and found no good fruit. Then he comes before this fig tree and finding no good fruit he curses it. Like I said this is no accident. The fig tree here is a symbol of the nation of Israel and it has been corrupted.

A good example of this imagery being used comes from Jeremiah 8:13, “13 When I would gather them, declares the Lord, there are no grapes on the vine, nor figs on the fig tree; even the leaves are withered, and what I gave them has passed away from them.” Jeremiah is saying the exact same thing as Jesus. He is looking at the house of Judah, the temple, the priests, the people and he is saying, “You are not bearing fruit.” And what does God do with branches that won’t bear fruit? He prunes them so that fruit bearing branches are prioritized.  

The illustration – This is where I want to put all this in picture form for you today. Because what Jesus says in Matthew 21, which we will explore next time in more detail, is that he is going to prune the dead branches and allow good branches to grow, “43 Therefore I tell you, the kingdom of God will be taken away from you and given to a people producing its fruits.”

Some people might read this and say, “Ah ha! There it is right there. God is going to take the kingdom of God away from Israel and give it to the Church!” There it is in black and white. But I am here to show that is a misunderstanding.

Some people read this and say, “But that’s replacement theology. God would not replace his people!” But they are also presenting a misunderstanding. Both those groups are wrong. In fact, the term “replacement theology” was invented in the 1980’s as a slur to denigrate historical Christianity which has always taught there is one people of God and it is those who trust in Jesus, the Messiah.

But something is being replaced in this passage, what is it? The answer is that the branches that do not bear fruit are being replaced. The Pharisees, the chief priests and their followers amongst the people of Israel who reject Jesus are going to be cut out of the tree, and Peter, James and John and all who followed Jesus will inherit the kingdom. Jesus is here to prune the tree, not replace it. Call it Israel, call it the Church, the flock, the bride, whatever you will, it is the same tree.

This image of the tree or vine is used all throughout the whole Bible. I have already shared some in this sermon. Here are a few more,  

Isaiah 5:5-7,

“5 And now I will tell you what I will do to my vineyard. I will remove its hedge, and it shall be devoured; I will break down its wall, and it shall be trampled down. 6 I will make it a waste; it shall not be pruned or hoed, and briers and thorns shall grow up; I will also command the clouds that they rain no rain upon it. 7 For the vineyard of the Lord of hosts is the house of Israel, and the men of Judah are his pleasant planting; and he looked for justice, but behold, bloodshed; for righteousness, but behold, an outcry!”

God is pruning the vineyard because it has not born fruit. The vineyard of the Lord of hosts is Israel. So, when Jesus says he is the true vine, what is he saying?

John 15:1-6,

“15 I am the true vine, and my Father is the vinedresser. 2 Every branch in me that does not bear fruit he takes away, and every branch that does bear fruit he prunes, that it may bear more fruit. 3 Already you are clean because of the word that I have spoken to you. 4 Abide in me, and I in you. As the branch cannot bear fruit by itself, unless it abides in the vine, neither can you, unless you abide in me. 5 I am the vine; you are the branches. Whoever abides in me and I in him, he it is that bears much fruit, for apart from me you can do nothing. 6 If anyone does not abide in me, he is thrown away like a branch and withers; and the branches are gathered, thrown into the fire, and burned.”

Jesus is the true vine, the true Israel, and only those who truly believe in him will bear fruit. The rest are cut off and thrown into the fire.

Our flesh accounts for nothing, only faith in God that produces good fruit counts.

And of course, the most famous example is Romans 11, which will round off our examples today,

“21 For if God did not spare the natural branches, neither will he spare you. 22 Note then the kindness and the severity of God: severity toward those who have fallen, but God's kindness to you, provided you continue in his kindness. Otherwise you too will be cut off. 23 And even they, if they do not continue in their unbelief, will be grafted in, for God has the power to graft them in again. 24 For if you were cut from what is by nature a wild olive tree, and grafted, contrary to nature, into a cultivated olive tree, how much more will these, the natural branches, be grafted back into their own olive tree” (Rom. 11:21-24).

Here Paul finishes his argument about who the true Israel is, and he says it is all who believe. Those who reject Christ, even if they are Jewish, are cut out of the tree. Those who trust in Jesus, even if they are Gentiles, are grafted into the tree.

But don’t be arrogant, you must continue in faith, “20 That is true. They were broken off because of their unbelief, but you stand fast through faith. So do not become proud, but fear” (Rom. 11:20). What is being proud in this context? It is relying on the flesh and not on faith.

This is the mistake that most of Israel made when Jesus came, and which Jesus is going to challenge in Matthew 21, 22 and 23. This is the mistake that Paul is determined to make sure that we do not copy. And it goes all the way back to Abraham, we saw it there. The child of promise inherited the promises, not the child of the flesh.

Application – This is where I drive it home and personalize this message for you: are you are fruit bearing branch? If Israelites, who were descended from Abraham, who did not bear fruit could be cut out of the tree, how much more could you an Australian, or South African, or Indian, or Brit, or European, or whoever you are be cut out if we do not bear fruit?

Do you know what God did when he destroyed the temple in AD 70? He removed the lampstand from the physical nation of Israel. But he also prophesied to the 7 churches that he would do the same to them if they did not bear fruit in keeping with repentance.

If you want to determine who the people of God are, you can’t look to a modern nation that claims the name Israel. I know some people really struggle with this. This happens because God’s people have always struggled not to see with eyes of flesh. But Jesus gives us to key to know where his people are: You have to look at who is bearing fruit. Only fruit bearing branches are truly of God.

Every generation has had to hear this same warning: only fruit bearing branches will inherit the kingdom. Because bearing fruit comes through faith, not the flesh. “43 Therefore I tell you, the kingdom of God will be taken away from you and given to a people producing its fruits.”

So, are you bearing fruit? Are you a truly believing fruit bearing branch? Because God will never replace his people. But he will replace branches that do not bear fruit with those that do.

Conclusion – Now you know where I am coming from on this. And why I will stick to this message. Flesh counts for nothing in God’s economy. He wants us to be people of faith. Let’s pray that he increases our faith and the fruit in our lives. Let’s pray.

Friday, 26 September 2025

Missed Another Rapture?

 


A person in a blue shirt

AI-generated content may be incorrect.

So, you might be aware that you missed another rapture this last week. I think that makes something like twenty that I am aware that I have missed so far. How many is that for you?

There had been some claims going around that the rapture would happen on either the 23rd of 24th of September. Of course, this prediction was wrong, as they always are. You would think that these people would have learnt by now to never make these predictions, but it seems people are slow learners, especially collectively, and especially on an issue like this. These kinds of false claims bring disrepute on those who promote them as true and on the Church in general. But why do these predictions keep happening, especially for this time of year?

I thought I would write a short piece revealing why some false prophets keep making these claims. It all comes down to the fact that their theological system is flawed, both systematically and basically. What I mean by that is they have been taught to read the Bible through a particular lens, but also they have failed to learn the basic principles of wisdom that the Bible teaches on top of that. So, let’s evaluate where they are coming from and seek to perhaps snap some people out of this kind of thinking.

Why are so many Christians convinced that the rapture will happen in September?

Firstly, this belief that the Rapture is likely to happen in September is not an official doctrine but a widespread inference based on a combination of connecting biblical symbolism, historical patterns, and astronomical events into a system to predict the coming of Jesus Christ. The primary reason centres on the belief that the Feast of Trumpets (Rosh Hashanah) is the most likely prophetic fulfillment of the Rapture.

Paul says in 1 Thessalonians 4:16, “For the Lord himself will descend from heaven with a cry of command, with the voice of an archangel, and with the sound of the trumpet of God. And the dead in Christ will rise first.” Identifying this verse with the Feast of Trumpets is a good example of pushing the biblical imagery too far. Also, how can the rapture both be secret and declared at the sound of a trumpet? Trumpets are used to make loud, distinctive noises, not quiet events.

Here’s a breakdown of the reasoning behind these false claims.

The Key Symbolism: The Feast of Trumpets (Rosh Hashanah)

In the Hebrew calendar, the seventh month (Tishrei, which usually falls in September) is incredibly significant. It contains the three great autumn feasts: Rosh Hashanah (Feast of Trumpets): 1st of Tishri, marking the beginning of the Jewish New Year, Yom Kippur (Day of Atonement): 10th of Tishri, Sukkot (Feast of Tabernacles): 15th-22nd of Tishrei. Because of the difference between the Jewish Calendar and the Julian Calender these dates fluctuate each year, but The Feast of Trumpets usually lands in September. Hence, there is massive noise made by certain rapture watchers each year in this month. I have been receiving notifications from these types of Christians most of my life. Without requesting them, mind you.

Dispensationalists believe the Spring Feasts (Passover, Unleavened Bread, Firstfruits, and Pentecost) were fulfilled precisely by the First Coming of Christ (His death, burial, resurrection, and the sending of the Holy Spirit). They reason that the Autumn Feasts will likewise be fulfilled by the events of the Second Coming. However, already this thinking is flawed, because the day of atonement clearly points to the atonement that Jesus achieved for us on the cross. For instance Paul says Jesus atoned or propitiated our sins on the cross,

“21 But now the righteousness of God has been manifested apart from the law, although the Law and the Prophets bear witness to it— 22 the righteousness of God through faith in Jesus Christ for all who believe. For there is no distinction: 23 for all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God, 24 and are justified by his grace as a gift, through the redemption that is in Christ Jesus, 25 whom God put forward as a propitiation by his blood, to be received by faith. This was to show God's righteousness, because in his divine forbearance he had passed over former sins” (Rom. 3:21-25).

John also points to this having been fulfilled, “1 My dear children, I write this to you so that you will not sin. But if anybody does sin, we have an advocate with the Father—Jesus Christ, the Righteous One. 2 He is the atoning sacrifice for our sins, and not only for ours but also for the sins of the whole world” (1 John 2:1-2, NIV).

Hence, pointing to another fulfilment of the atonement is unjustified. It is the result of being too hyper-literal with the feasts of Scriptures, feasts which have been fulfilled in Christ.

Also Rosh Hashanah is specifically called "Yom Teruah," the "Day of the Blowing of the Trumpet" (Leviticus 23:24). For some dispensationalists, and I stress some, this creates a powerful symbolic link to the Rapture,

  • 1 Corinthians 15:52: "...in a moment, in the twinkling of an eye, at the last trumpet. For the trumpet will sound, and the dead will be raised imperishable, and we shall be changed" (NIV).
  • 1 Thessalonians 4:16: "For the Lord Himself will descend from heaven with a shout, with the voice of an archangel, and with the trumpet of God. And the dead in Christ will rise first" (NIV).

The argument is straightforward from their perspective: The Rapture is associated with a trumpet blast. The next feast on God's prophetic calendar that involves a trumpet blast is the Feast of Trumpets. Therefore, they argue that it is a compelling candidate for the timing of the Rapture.

The problem is, though, that neither the New Testament, nor the Old Testament for that matter, puts forward any indication that the coming of Christ will come in the Feast of Trumpets. The Trumpet to be sounded is the heavenly trumpet, not an earthly one. God does not bind it to any human event or festival. He actually discourages guessing at the time of his coming, “36 But concerning that day and hour no one knows, not even the angels of heaven, nor the Son, but the Father only” (Matt. 24:36). Dispensationalists will argue that the previous verses show we can guess the general time frame, but this is more an indication that when his return is really close people will see clear signs, it is not an indication that we can guess the time of year. Plus, the fact that every prediction has turned out to be wrong so far shows their framework for understanding this stuff is wrong.

The "Unknown Day and Hour" and the New Moon

The way that these rapture watchers subvert this verse is more indication that their framework is wrong. It is known to many of them that the common objection to date-setting is Matthew 24:36, as I have argued. However, even though Jesus is clear in what he says, proponents of the September/Rosh Hashanah view argue that this verse supports their timing.

Rosh Hashanah is unique among the feasts because it is the only one that begins on the first sliver of the new moon. In ancient times, the new moon was confirmed by eyewitnesses. If clouds obscured the moon, the exact start of the feast was delayed until the moon was sighted. Therefore, it is claimed that this feast was also called "a day and hour no one knows." Some claim that this phrase is a well-known idiom for Rosh Hashanah. They argue that Jesus was using a phrase that pointed directly to this feast when speaking of His return.

However, there is no indication in the Bible itself, or even in history of Jesus’ day that I am aware of, that this phrase is associated with this holiday. And it is clear that if you know what date the new moon is going to fall on you would know the actual “day” and “hour” of the New Moon. Hence, this argument simply subverts what Jesus is saying. It is a product of seeking to see a code in what Jesus says that is not there. He is simply warning us to be ready for the judgement to come, and the context referring to the events in Noah’s day makes this the plain reading of the text,

“37 For as were the days of Noah, so will be the coming of the Son of Man. 38 For as in those days before the flood they were eating and drinking, marrying and giving in marriage, until the day when Noah entered the ark, 39 and they were unaware until the flood came and swept them all away, so will be the coming of the Son of Man” (Matt. 24:37-39).

Be wary of any readings of Bible texts that turn the plain meaning of the words on their heads.

Historical and Astronomical "Signs"

These rapture watchers also look for certain historical and astronomical signs. This is where the speculation becomes more intense and less biblically grounded (though saying it was biblically grounded previously is being overly generous). Proponents often point to patterns:

The Shemitah and Jubilee Cycles: Some teachers highlight seven-year (Shemitah) and 50-year (Jubilee) cycles in the Bible. They note that significant financial and historical events for Israel and the world seem to cluster around these cycles, often in the autumn. This creates a sense that God is working on a calendar that culminates in the fall.

But note, Jesus said nothing about his return coinciding with any of these cycles. There are large periods of time where no significant events happen in line with these cycles. This is simply a case of selectively choosing history. 

Blood Moons: The recent "blood moon tetrads" (four consecutive total lunar eclipses falling on Jewish feasts) that occurred in 2014-2015 and 1949-1950 (coinciding with the founding of the modern state of Israel and the Six-Day War)[1] fueled speculation that these were "signs in the sun and moon" (Acts 2:20, Luke 21:25) pointing to an imminent autumn event.

The Rebirth of Israel: Since Israel is seen as the "fig tree" of Matthew 24:32-34, its rebirth in 1948 is considered the starting gun for the final generation. Calculations based on a generation being 70-80 years (Psalm 90:10) often point to a window of time culminating in the 2020s, with September being the focal point each year.

There are many issues with the blood moons and the rebirth of Israel being a sign for his return. But specifically the idea that Jesus would return within one generation of Israel being established is never mentioned once, not once, in the entire Bible. Firstly, biblical generations were not 70-80 years, they were 20 to 40 years. No one over the age of twenty was allowed to enter into the promise land, remember (Numb. 14). Why? So, that the new generation could receive the inheritance. The new generation being those under twenty. By the age of twenty most ancient Israelites would have one or more children, hence generations were not 70-80 years, but much shorter. Life spans may have been 70-80 years, which is what Psalm 90:10 mentions, but not generations.

Also, the fig tree in Matthew 24 is a farming illustration,

“32 From the fig tree learn its lesson: as soon as its branch becomes tender and puts out its leaves, you know that summer is near. 33 So also, when you see all these things, you know that he is near, at the very gates. 34 Truly, I say to you, this generation will not pass away until all these things take place. 35 Heaven and earth will pass away, but my words will not pass away” (Matt. 24:32-35).

The fig tree can be symbolic of Israel, it is for instance in Matthew 21. But the context drives the meaning. In this passage Jesus is using it as a symbol for knowing what season it is. When the tree begins to leave you know that summer is near. Jesus explains how he is using this symbol here. To add another meaning and connect it to 1948 is arbitrary at best, deception at worst. 

So, there is no statement in the Bible that Jesus would return because of the creation of secular nation called Israel that is in very few ways connected to the nation of the Bible anyway.

It is crucial to understand that this is a popular inference, not a core doctrine of dispensationalism. Many leading dispensational theologians caution against this kind of date-setting. Partly, because they have seen how many false predictors have been burnt by these kind of statements. Also it creates a skewed emphasis. The consistent biblical command is to be watchful at all times (Matthew 24:42), not just in September. Focusing on a specific month can lead to spiritual lethargy for the other eleven months of the year. It also creates a lot of hype about nothing.

In short, many dispensationalist pre-millennial thinkers believe the Rapture is likely to happen in September because in their system the strong symbolic connection between the trumpet blast of the Feast of Trumpets (Rosh Hashanah) and the trumpet blast described in the passages they claim to teach the rapture. This belief is amplified by interpretations of historical patterns, astronomical signs, and the "day no one knows" idiom. However, it remains a speculative trend, and even most mainstream dispensationalist leaders would strongly advise against setting any dates, emphasizing instead the constant hope and readiness that should characterize the Church.

For those of us who know that the New Testament does not teach a secret rapture, but rather the hope of the second coming we can know that Jesus is returning for us, one day, without delving into foolish speculations. Hebrews tells us, “27 And just as it is appointed for man to die once, and after that comes judgment, 28 so Christ, having been offered once to bear the sins of many, will appear a second time, not to deal with sin but to save those who are eagerly waiting for him.” Just as there was one sacrifice that Jesus made on our behalf there will be one return of Christ where Jesus returns to take us home. We know we cannot guess the hour so we reject all attempts to do so. I would also say that we should also reject all systems which encourage people to make claims that we should not make.

List of References



[1] https://www.christiantruthcenter.com/significance-of-four-blood-moons-coinciding-with-jewish-feasts-passover-and-sukkot/

Thursday, 25 September 2025

This Is Not Defending Civilisation

 

Herod the Great[1]

Many Christian Zionists like to argue that supporting Israel is defending Western Civilisation. Even when Israel does things which the West has historically seen as criminal, like strike at ambassadors,

“Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu defended his country's controversial strike on Hamas leaders in Qatar as "legitimate" during talks with US Secretary of State Marco Rubio Monday, rejecting international condemnation while announcing continued plans for the Gaza City offensive.

In a joint press conference following their meeting, Rubio stressed that Washington stands firmly behind Israel and reiterated US President Donald Trump’s views to achieve a lasting peace: release of all hostages living and deceased and the end of Hamas leadership.

Netanyahu said that the Israel-Hamas war, which is nearing its second-year mark, cannot end without achieving all of Israel’s military objectives, namely the destruction of the Gaza-based group.”[2]

What a lot of people fail to mention is that those Hamas leaders were gathered there for peace talks,

“Ian Parmeter, a Middle East expert at the ANU Centre of Arab and Islamic Studies, told SBS News the strikes on Qatar are "odd".

"It's an attack which really is puzzling, particularly since they don't appear to have got [US President] Donald Trump on side with it in advance," he said.

"It's odd, if you are serious about negotiations, you don't try to kill the other side's negotiators.

"It does raise questions all around the world as to the extent to which Israel is serious about negotiating a ceasefire with Hamas."

In a post on his Truth Social network, US President Donald Trump insisted he played no role in the attack in Doha.

"This was a decision made by Prime Minister [Benjamin] Netanyahu; it was not a decision made by me," he said.

Parmeter said the strike "upsets" efforts for peace, which have so far been unsuccessfully mediated by Qatar and the US.”[3]

I know many Christian Zionists and they have very little regard for the UN and international criminal courts and such entities. I personally am sympathetic with some of their stances on these issues. We saw how bowing to international bodies can lead to chaos throughout the world during the Covid scare a few years ago. Many of these international bodies have illegitimate claims to power. The sooner we break all ties with European Emission standards for our cars here in Australia, the better off we will all be, for instance. Many other examples of international law and agreement nonsense could be given.

But the wickedness of striking against ambassadors is no modern standard. It is not the product of our soft and decadent age. It is an ancient standard, derived from long standing traditions of civilisation and also from divine law. What’s more is that even figures in history that we would not consider to be good men understood this. Herod the Great is one example. In a speech to his men prior to a battle against the Nabatean kingdom he says this,

“They have perpetrated what Greeks and barbarians alike agree to be the worst possible offence against the law, by cutting the throats of our ambassadors. The Greeks have declared heralds to be sacred and inviolate, while we have learned the noblest of our doctrines and the holiest part of our law from messengers sent by God. The name of herald can reveal God to mankind and reconcile enemy with enemy. What greater sacrilege could there be, therefore, than to kill ambassadors whose mission was to negotiate a just peace? And after committing such crimes, how could they expect to enjoy a prosperous life, or success in warfare? In my judgement, this is impossible.”[4]

Back into ancient times attacking ambassadors was seen as a terrible crime. To say that Israel is defending Western Civilisation by fighting this way is to subvert the concept. Even before the rise of Christian chivalry codes, the sacred honour given to ambassadors and peace envoys was part of our heritage. The US should know better. Christians should know better. This is not how our civilisation has worked at its best. We are not watching Western Civilisation be defended with such actions, we are watching it be subverted and turned into something else. And Christians are twisting Bible verses to say this is all according to God’s will. Christians should know better than this. 

 List of References

Tuesday, 23 September 2025

Feminism is An Ancient Evil

 




Feminism is not a new ideology, or a recent development. Many people think it is, and seek to claim that it is a sign of the progress of humanity. But in reality it is the result of the resurgence of an ancient evil. I have demonstrated on my blog that it is not an accident that feminist cultures are also the most bloody and violent cultures. This is because human sacrifice is inherent to various forms of feminist ideology, in our modern society it is called abortion or reproductive rights, but it is simply a new skin on an old evil.

Here is something from which I am writing where I demonstrate how ancient this evil is. Note especially how feminist the religion of Asherah is, and how remarkably familiar it also is:

“Here is a powerful account of Asherah, which highlights several things; the power of a female deity, the nature of how women can overrule their husbands, and the fact that even ancient patriarchal cultures recognized the reality of matriarchal power. This account is about Baal and his consort Anat desiring authority from El for Baal to have his own palace, and their approach to Asherah to help him get it,

“After a while Asherah asks the couple for the reason of their visit accompanied with such costly presents. Anat is the one who replies. Her husband Baal has no palace of his own, he has to make do with quarters in the palace of his father-in-law El, a situation that has to be changed, because every real god is supposed to have his own palace. Already earlier Anat had begged El directly for a palace for Baal but apparently without lasting success. Now she is requesting her mother to intercede for Baal with her father El. It is surely remarkable that in Ilimalik's representation of the divine world male deities were the formal rulers, but goddesses determined the real course of events!...

…With a formal phrase attested more than once she praises his intellectual, not his physical prowess. At the same time Asherah affirms that she has ruled out her husband as king of the gods. Apparently she regards her son-in-law Baal as the candidate to replace him. El does not protest. Asherah succeeds in convincing El to give his permission for the building of a palace for Baal. Apparently she has a decisive influence on major decisions of her husband, the king of the gods. Later on in the myth of Baal Asherah determines El's choice of a successor for Baal, in the same way as the biblical Bathsheba does for her son Solomon (1 Kgs 1)…

…It is likely that this too reflects the situation on earth where queens, especially queen-mothers, often influenced the political choices of their royal husbands and in many cases decided who would be the next on the throne…

…The word of queen-mother Asherah is followed blindly. The author of the myth, Ilimalik, apparently wants to describe her as the real power behind the ageing king of the universe.”[1]

This account of the power and direction of Asherah is every bit as subversive as anything written by one of Faxneld’s 19th Century satanic feminists. This could also be an inspiration for an episode of Everybody Loves Raymond, where the main character Ray is constantly torn between following the lead of his wife or the whim of his mother. But more importantly it shows that the archetypal husband-dominating woman, Jezebel, was not an anomaly in the ancient world, she was a common reoccurrence. In fact note this comment by Jezebel to her husband Ahab in the Scriptures;

“5 But Jezebel his wife came to him and said to him, “Why is your spirit so vexed that you eat no food?” 6 And he said to her, “Because I spoke to Naboth the Jezreelite and said to him, ‘Give me your vineyard for money, or else, if it please you, I will give you another vineyard for it.’ And he answered, ‘I will not give you my vineyard.’” 7 And Jezebel his wife said to him, “Do you now govern Israel? Arise and eat bread and let your heart be cheerful; I will give you the vineyard of Naboth the Jezreelite” (1 Kings 21:5-7).

Here Jezebel shows us who the true power was in Israel, her, not her husband. It is surely not a coincidence that Jezebel was an advocate of a god like Asherah, because in the Canaanite mythology, Asherah had come to dominate the creator God, El, just as Jezebel had dominated Ahab, and also just as she had introduced Aherah and Baal to replace and dominate Yahweh, or El Shaddai. This is a clear example of Satanic Feminist subversion, by Faxneld’s definition is his book.    

There is a reason Jezebel is seen as an archetype of feminist religious power. She represented a reality in some parts of the Ancient Near East that is picked up by modern feminists. In condemning Asherah worship and Jezebel and women like her, the Bible is explicitly condemning what we would later call feminism, or women leading men. To unleash Asherah (or Ishtar, or Aphrodite, or Astarte etc., etc.) worship on a society was to unleash feminism on a society and the chaos that causes.

So, we can see that the Bible, and surrounding cultures, acknowledge the reality of women being powerful in both religion and statecraft, and the Bible challenges it directly. But there is another example of this in the New Testament, and it is a woman also called Jezebel.” 

List of References

[1] Korpel, Mario C.A. 2001, “Asherah Outside Israel” Only one God? : monotheism in ancient Israel and the veneration of the goddess Asherah, Bob Becking editor. London ; New York : Sheffield Academic Press ; 2001; pp135-136