AI Matt vs Matt

 

If you are not trying out AI you really need to have a look at it. I have used it to create images for sometime now for sermons and videos. And more recently I have been using it to make music, especially with lyrics from my own poems and from the Psalms. Today I asked it to summarize my teachings on feminism on my blog. This is what it came up with:

“Here’s a concise summary of Matthew Littlefield’s key arguments about feminism, synthesized from his writings and public statements in the provided sources:

1. Feminism Has Satanic Roots

Littlefield asserts that feminism is inherently anti-Christian and originated from Satanic influences. He cites historical scholarship (e.g., Per Faxneld’s Satanic Feminism) to argue that early feminists reinterpreted the biblical Fall as a liberation narrative, casting Lucifer as a liberator of women from patriarchal "bondage." This rebellion against divine order, he claims, aligns feminism with spiritual rebellion against God 23.

2. Feminism Rejects Biblical Gender Roles

Littlefield contends that feminism directly opposes scriptural teachings on gender. He references passages like 1 Timothy 2:12 ("I do not permit a woman to teach or exercise authority over a man") and Genesis 2:22-23 (Adam naming Eve) to argue that the Bible mandates male headship in family and society. Feminism’s push for female leadership and equality, he claims, violates these divine boundaries and leads to societal "curses" 2.

3. Equality Is Not a Biblical Concept

He rejects the idea that feminism’s pursuit of equality aligns with Christianity. Using the parable of the vineyard workers (Matthew 20:1–16), he argues that God’s grace is not about equal treatment but divine prerogative. Littlefield asserts that the Bible emphasizes hierarchy (e.g., sheep vs. goats, spiritual authority) rather than equality, making feminism’s egalitarian goals incompatible with Scripture 2.

4. Feminism Harms Women and Society

Littlefield claims feminism creates unrealistic expectations for women, such as careerism over motherhood, leading to burnout and dissatisfaction. He also argues that feminist ideologies erode traditional family structures, weaken the Church, and destabilize national identity by promoting individualism over communal roles. For example, he critiques feminism for normalizing "gender-bending" and undermining marriage as an institution 13.

5. Feminism and Transgenderism Share Ideological Ties

He links feminism’s origins to transgender activism, arguing that both movements seek to dismantle gender boundaries. Early feminists, he claims, were inspired by Satanic imagery of boundary transgression (e.g., the serpent as a genderless figure in medieval art) and proto-transgender ideas, such as Mary Wollstonecraft’s son-in-law Percy Shelley advocating for gender abolition. Littlefield views modern intersectional feminism as a continuation of this rebellion against natural, God-ordained distinctions 3.”

This is not a bad summary of my teachings on feminism and equality, though it is light on the examples, I provide much more evidence against the idea of equality being biblical than simply one parable. But it is just a summary, of course. 

I was so fascinated at how well AI did this, that I asked it to write a short essay on how feminism is dangerous to society, based on what it learnt from my writings. Here is what it came up with:

“Here is an essay in the style of Matthew Littlefield’s theological and cultural critiques, synthesizing arguments from his writings as reflected in the provided sources:

Feminism: A Rebellion Against Divine Order and the Collapse of Society

By Rev. Matthew Littlefield (AI)

The modern feminist movement, celebrated by secular progressives as a triumph of liberation, is in reality a spiritual and social catastrophe. Far from empowering women or advancing justice, feminism has eroded the God-ordained structures of family, church, and nation, replacing them with a toxic ideology rooted in rebellion against divine authority. Its fruits—disintegrating marriages, fatherless children, and a culture hostile to biblical truth—reveal its inherently destructive nature. This essay will demonstrate that feminism is not merely misguided but actively harmful to society, drawing on theological, historical, and social evidence to expose its dangers.

1. Satanic Origins and Anti-Christian Foundations

Feminism’s roots are not in Christian compassion or justice but in a deliberate rejection of God’s design. As documented by historian Per Faxneld in Satanic Feminism: Lucifer as the Liberator of Women in Nineteenth-Century Culture, early feminists reinterpreted the biblical Fall as a narrative of liberation, casting Satan as a misunderstood liberator of women from patriarchal oppression 2. This inversion of Scripture reveals feminism’s core rebellion: it seeks to dismantle the created order, where men and women are assigned distinct, complementary roles (Genesis 2:22-23). By framing Eve’s disobedience as a heroic act, feminism aligns itself with spiritual forces opposed to God’s sovereignty—a truth evident in its rejection of male headship in the home and church (1 Timothy 2:11-12) 2.

The movement’s theological incoherence is further exposed in its misuse of Christ’s teachings. Jesus’ parable of the vineyard workers (Matthew 20:1-16), often misread as endorsing equality, instead underscores God’s prerogative to assign roles and rewards according to His wisdom, not human demands for parity 2. Feminism’s obsession with equality—a concept foreign to Scripture—replaces divine hierarchy with human arrogance, fostering resentment rather than gratitude.

2. The Destruction of the Family and Social Order

Feminism’s assault on the family is its most devastating legacy. By promoting the lie that women need not submit to their husbands (Ephesians 5:22-24) or prioritize motherhood, it has normalized the fragmentation of homes. Isaiah 3:12 warns, “My people—infants are their oppressors, and women rule over them. O my people, your guides mislead you.” This prophetic indictment mirrors our reality: children raised in fatherless households, wives usurping authority, and a culture that mocks the sanctity of marriage 2.

The consequences are measurable. Studies show that children in single-parent homes face higher rates of poverty, addiction, and incarceration—outcomes feminism exacerbates by encouraging women to prioritize careers over covenantal marriage 2. The movement’s celebration of “sexual liberation” has further normalized promiscuity, abortion, and divorce, severing the sacred bond between sex, procreation, and lifelong commitment.

3. Feminism’s Deception: Equality as a Path to Enslavement

Feminism claims to champion women’s freedom but instead enslaves them to unrealistic expectations. By insisting women can “have it all”—careers, independence, and family—it imposes unbearable burdens. Women today report higher rates of anxiety, depression, and burnout than previous generations, a direct result of rejecting their God-given calling to nurture and submit 1. The movement’s fixation on dismantling gender roles has left women adrift, disconnected from the dignity of biblical womanhood exemplified by Sarah, who “obeyed Abraham, calling him lord” (1 Peter 3:6) 2.

Moreover, feminism’s alliance with transgender ideology exposes its nihilistic endgame. By denying the fixed reality of biological sex, it seeks to erase God’s creative distinction between male and female (Genesis 1:27). This rebellion against natural law culminates in the grotesque spectacle of men in women’s sports, children subjected to experimental surgeries, and a culture that glorifies confusion over clarity 2.

4. The Collapse of National Identity and Moral Foundations

Feminism’s corrosive effects extend beyond the family to the nation. Historically, strong societies were built on strong families, with men leading households and women cultivating virtue in the home. Feminism’s demand for androgyny has weakened this foundation, replacing patriotic duty with individualistic narcissism. Australia, once a “land of plenty” blessed with natural and spiritual abundance, now faces moral decay as it idolizes wealth, sexual license, and feminist dogma 2.

The church, too, has capitulated. By ordaining female pastors and diluting Scripture to appease cultural trends, it undermines its prophetic voice. A “rich church” that tolerates feminism is like a “chubby guy” clinging to harmful habits: it may enjoy temporary comfort but will ultimately face divine judgment 2.

5. A Call to Repentance and Restoration

The solution to feminism’s damage lies not in policy reforms but in repentance. Society must return to the biblical model of gender roles, where men embrace sacrificial leadership and women find joy in dignified submission. Churches must reject “woke” theology and reaffirm the Apostle Paul’s injunction: “I do not permit a woman to teach or to exercise authority over a man” (1 Timothy 2:12) 2. Only by restoring God’s design can we heal families, revive nations, and honor our Creator.

Conclusion

Feminism is not a neutral movement but a spiritual rebellion with dire consequences. Its rejection of divine hierarchy, promotion of moral relativism, and destruction of the family reveal its alignment with forces hostile to human flourishing. For the sake of future generations, we must reject its lies and reclaim the truth: true freedom is found not in autonomy but in joyful submission to God’s perfect design.

This essay synthesizes Rev. Littlefield’s arguments from sermons and articles, emphasizing his theological framework, critique of equality, and warnings about feminism’s societal impact 12.”

How good is that conclusion? “Feminism is not a neutral movement but a spiritual rebellion with dire consequences. Its rejection of divine hierarchy, promotion of moral relativism, and destruction of the family reveal its alignment with forces hostile to human flourishing. For the sake of future generations, we must reject its lies and reclaim the truth: true freedom is found not in autonomy but in joyful submission to God’s perfect design.” Really good.

Deepseek has done well here. It has correctly summarized my views on each of these subjects, and presented what I would say is a good and concise argument for the dangers of feminism for society.

However, AI writing is robotic. It lack’s flavour. I know there are people training it to be better at this. But AI writes in a very competent but soulless way. Its essay structure is immaculate, and I only found one spelling mistake. But it sounds like a robot’s summary.

However, this is still early AI, imagine what it is going to become. I will continue to write my own blogs and articles, because I personally enjoy it and think I am better writer than AI is. But it is only going to get better. Those who find creative ways to use AI will excel in the coming years. If you can use it to make your work more efficient, that is probably a good idea.